본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

안서의 번역론: 서양시 번역 분석을 중심으로

Ansu’s Translation Discourse: Focusing on the Comparative Analysis of the Translations of Western Poems

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper will examine where the translation discourse of Kim Uk, Ansu, exists in the trend of hermeneutic translation discourse, then examine how he reflects his translation philosophy in his translated products of western poems through analysis of his translations. Ansu translated and introduced western literary works in Joseun in 1920s and 1930s. He translated directly from the source text’s language. He was different from other translators such as Choi Namsun who used the Japanese translation as the source text and tried to enlighten the target language readers through translated works. Due to Ansu’s translated works, Joseun readers could experience western literary texts and enhance their understanding of western culture. Ansu presented his translation perception based on his translation practice. Ansu’s translated works and his translation discourse are regarded as a crucial information for studying the introduction of western literary texts in 1920s and 1930s. Ansu’s role in the Joseun’s translation history can be compared with that of Tytler who was the translator to present ‘the Priciple of Translation’, and of Benjamin who concretely commented on the role of the translator. They are regarded as a milestone of translation history in western translation theory. According to the result of analysis on Ansu’s poem translation, he tried to incorporate his literary skill in his translation rather than keeping faithfulness to the source texts. He adopted the domestication strategy of translation. In his introduction of foreign literary work, he put priority in making target language readers understand the contents of the source texts. This strategy might not be appropriate in literary translation. However, we can not judge his products strictly based on the criteria of the literary translation since literary products in particular can not be free from the periodical background. His role as a pioneer of the period was to translate the western literature from the source text’s language and introduce to the public in the enlightening period to modern times of Joseun.

Abstract

This paper will examine where the translation discourse of Kim Uk, Ansu, exists in the trend of hermeneutic translation discourse, then examine how he reflects his translation philosophy in his translated products of western poems through analysis of his translations. Ansu translated and introduced western literary works in Joseun in 1920s and 1930s. He translated directly from the source text’s language. He was different from other translators such as Choi Namsun who used the Japanese translation as the source text and tried to enlighten the target language readers through translated works. Due to Ansu’s translated works, Joseun readers could experience western literary texts and enhance their understanding of western culture. Ansu presented his translation perception based on his translation practice. Ansu’s translated works and his translation discourse are regarded as a crucial information for studying the introduction of western literary texts in 1920s and 1930s. Ansu’s role in the Joseun’s translation history can be compared with that of Tytler who was the translator to present ‘the Priciple of Translation’, and of Benjamin who concretely commented on the role of the translator. They are regarded as a milestone of translation history in western translation theory. According to the result of analysis on Ansu’s poem translation, he tried to incorporate his literary skill in his translation rather than keeping faithfulness to the source texts. He adopted the domestication strategy of translation. In his introduction of foreign literary work, he put priority in making target language readers understand the contents of the source texts. This strategy might not be appropriate in literary translation. However, we can not judge his products strictly based on the criteria of the literary translation since literary products in particular can not be free from the periodical background. His role as a pioneer of the period was to translate the western literature from the source text’s language and introduce to the public in the enlightening period to modern times of Joseun.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. "『금성』, 창간호, 1923, 11.10", ~
  2. 김병철, "한국근대번역문학사연구" (1975), 을유문화사
  3. 김 억, "시단 산책-금성, 폐허 이후를 읽고", 개벽, (46), pp.33~34 (1924)
  4. 김 억, "안서김억전집 2-1: 서구시역집" (1987), 한국문화사
  5. 김 억, "안서김억전집 5: 문예비평전집" (1987), 한국문화사
  6. 박옥수, "개화기 한국 번역 작품의 기술적, 기능적 분석", 겨레어문학, 41(41), pp.483~513 (2008), 겨레어문학회
  7. 이창식, "오뇌의 무도의 번역양상", 한국문학연구, (10) (1987)
  8. "태서문예신보 합본" (1981), 태학사
  9. Baker, Mona, "In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation" (1992), Routledge
  10. Benjamin, Walter, "The Task of the Translator” In: Illuminations: Walter Benjamin Essays and Reflections", pp.69~82 (1968), Schocken
  11. Jakobson, Roman, "“On linguistic aspects of translation” Lawrence Venuti , Translation Studies Reader", pp.113~118 (2000), Routledge
  12. Kingscott, Geoffrey, "Bicentenary of Tytler’s Principles of Translation", pp.13~16 (1991), Language International
  13. Reiss, Katharina, "Text Types, Translation Types and Translation Assessment", pp.105~115, Finn Lectura
  14. Schleiermacher, Friedrich, "On the different methods of translating", pp.36~54 (1992), University of Chicago Press
  15. Sisson, Charles H, "“On translating Dante,” In: The Divine Comedy", pp.35~43 (1993), Oxford University Press
  16. St. Jerome, "“On the best kind of translator,” Western Translation Theory from Herodotus to Nietzsche" (1997), St. Jerome Publications

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)