본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

FDI와 투자정책으로 살펴본 미·중 관계의 변화

A Change of the Sino-US Relations in Terms of Their FDIs and Investment Policies

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류지역학

초록

이 논문은 미국과 중국 간의 FDI와 이에 관련된 투자정책의 변화를 살펴봄으로써 양국 간의 정치적 관계가 변화한 양상을 설명했다. 미국과 중국의 관계 변화 양상을 FDI로 설명하려면 우선 중국 기업들의 대미 FDI 증가가 양국 간의 자본흐름과 경제 및 기술적 비대칭성을 감소시키고 있다는 점으로부터출발한다. 미국은 가장 강력한 경쟁자로 부상한 중국과의 현재 격차를 유지하기 위해 중국 FDI의 유입을 규제하게 되었다. 중국은 그러한 미국의 태도 변화에 반발하고 있다. 이로 인해 현재 양국의 정치적 갈등 가능성이 과거에 비해 훨씬 높아진 상태이다. 2000년대 이전까지 양국 사이에서 진행되었던 FDI는 전반적으로 미국에서 중국으로향하는 일방적인 흐름을 보였다. 이러한 자본 흐름의 비대칭성은 중국의 저렴한 노동력과 지대를 활용하여 비용절감을 꾀한 미국 기업들의 이윤추구 동기와 경제발전에 필요한자본을 충당코자 했던 중국 정부의 발전전략이 맞물린 결과였다. 그러나 2000년대 이후급격하게 증가한 중국 기업의 대미 FDI는 과거 양국 간 자본 흐름의 비대칭성을 빠르게감소시키고 있다. 또한 중국의 대미 FDI 진출은 단순히 경제적 이익을 추구하는 것 이외에 핵심기술과 주요 천연자원을 확보하려는 중국 정부의 전략적 목표를 내포하고 있다.

Abstract

This essay intends to explain the contemporary change of Sino-US political relationships through observing their FDI relations and investment policies related to FDI. The explanation on the US-PRC relational change by their FDIs starts from the fact that increasing Chinese FDI toward the US is altering their traditional FDI flows and reducing their economic and technological gap. The US began to restrict the inflow of Chinese FDI in order to maintain her superiority over China which came to be one of the most powerful contenders for mastery of the world stage. The PRC is resisting the change in the US attitude. Therefore, the possibility of their political strife has become much higher than before. The US-China FDI flow was one-sided before the 2000s, mainly from the US toward the PRC. T he a symmetric c apital f low was possible b ecause the p rofit-maximizing motive o f American companies to use Chinese low-cost labor and land, and the developmental strategy of China to utilize American investment capital for economic growth were interlocked. However, dramatically increased FDI of Chinese companies toward the US since the 2000s reduced the traditional asymmetry in their capital flow. Chinese FDI toward the US has strategic goals. It pursues not only economic gains but also cutting-edge technologies and natural resources.

참고문헌 (66)

  1. 김석우, "한국의 대중국 해외직접투자의 정치경제", 국제지역연구, 15(4), pp.125~144 (2012), 국제지역연구센터
  2. 이준호, "2007년 미국 외국인투자와 국가안보에 관한 법률", 한국법제연구원 내부자료, ~ (2008)
  3. 중국의 대외직접투자 현황과 전망, "KIEP 북경사무소.", ~, pp.중국경제 현안 브리핑 제07-21호 (2007)
  4. Abdelal, Rawi, "Has Globalization Passed Its Peak?", Foreign Affairs, 86(1) (2007)
  5. Altman, Roger C., "The Great Crash, 2008: A Geopolitical Setback for the West", Foreign Affairs, 88(1) (2009)
  6. US Interests in Central Asia and the Challenges to Them, "Blank, Stephen J.", Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College, ~ (2007)
  7. Bremmer, Ian, "The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations" (2010), Portfolio
  8. Brzezinski, Zbigniew, "The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geos-trategic Imperatives" (1997), Basic Books
  9. Burrows, Mathew J., "Revisiting the Future: Geopolitical Effects of the Financial Crisis", The Washington Quarterly, 32(2) (2009)
  10. Caraley, Demetrios James, "American Hegemony: Preventive War, Iraq and Imposing Democracy" (2004), The Academy of Political Science
  11. Center for Strategic & International Studies, "Issue in Focus: China’s ‘Going-out’ Investment Policy", Freeman Briefing, ~ (2008)
  12. Technological Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment - A Survey, "Fan, Emma Xiaoqin", Asian Development Bank, ~, pp.ERD Working Paper No. 33 (2002)
  13. Ferdinand, Peter, "Russia and China: Converging responses to globalization", Inter-national Affairs, 83(4) (2007)
  14. Ferguson, Niall, "Chimerica and the Global Asset Market Boom", International Finance, 10(3) (2007)
  15. Gilpin, Robert, "US Power and the Multinational Corporations: the Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment" (1975), Basic Books
  16. Graham, Edward M., "US National Security and Foreign Direct Investment" (2006), Peterson Institute for International Economics
  17. Guzzini, Stefano, "Structural Power: the Limits of Neorealist Power Analysis", In-ternational Organization, 47(3) (1993)
  18. Structural Power in International Monetary Relations, "Helleiner, Eric", EUI, 5~, pp.EUI Working Papers. RSCAS No. 2005 (2005), 10
  19. Holbrooke, Richard, "The Next President: Mastering a Daunting Agenda", Foreign Affairs, 87(5) (2008)
  20. Chinese Resources and Energy Policy in Sub-Saharan Africa, "Holslag, Jonathan", Development Committee of the European Parliament, ~ (2007)
  21. Johnson, Loch K., "Seven Sins of American Foreign Policy" (2007), Pearson Education Inc
  22. Kagan, Robert., "The September 12 Paradigm: America, the World, and George W. Bush", Foreign Affairs, 87(5) (2008)
  23. Kronstadt, K. Alan, "India - US Relations", CRS Issue Brief for Congress (2006)
  24. Lieber, Keir A., "The Rise of US Nuclear Primacy", Foreign Affairs, 85(2) (2006)
  25. Luo, Yadon, "Entrepreneurial Pioneer of International Venturing: the Case of Huawei", Organizational Dynamics, 40 (2011)
  26. Medeiros, Evan S., "A New Direction for China’s Defense Industry" (2005), RAND Corporation
  27. Moran, Theodore H., "The Globalization of America’s Defense Industries: Managing the Threat of Foreign Dependence", International Security, 15(1) (1990)
  28. National Intelligence Council, "Global Trends 2025: A Transformed World" (2008), National Intelligence Council
  29. Nye, Joseph S. Jr, "The Paradox of American Power: Why the World Only Superpower can’t Go It Alone" (2002), Oxford University Press
  30. An American Open Door?: Maximizing the Benefits of Chinese Foreign Direct Investment, "Rosen, Daniel", Asia Society, ~ (2011)
  31. Strange, Susan, "Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges: Approaches to World Politics for the 1990’s" (1989), Lexington Books
  32. Strange, Susan, "States and Markets" (1994), Printer Publishers Limited
  33. The National Security Implications of Investments and Products from the People’s Republic of China in the Telecommunications Sector, "US Chamber of Commerce", US-China Economic and Security Review, ~ (2011)
  34. National Security Assessment of the Domestic and Foreign Subcontractor Base: A Study of Three US navy Weapon Systems, "US Department of Commerce", Department of Commerce, ~ (1992)
  35. Energy in a Changing World, "Van der Linde, Coby", ~, pp.Clingendael Energy Papers No. 11 (2005)
  36. Walt, Stephen M., "Theory of International Politics" (1979), McGraw Hill
  37. Wan, Kam-Ming, "Economic Impact of Political Barriers to Cross0border Acquisitions: An Empirical Study of Connc’s Unsuccessful Takeover of Unocal", Journal of Corporate Finance, 15 (2009)
  38. Wohlforth, William C., "The Stability of Unipolar World", International Security, 24(Summer) (1999)
  39. Woodward, Bob, "Plan of Attack" (2004), Simon & Schuster
  40. Zha, Daojiong, "China's Energy Security: Domestic and International Issues", Survival, 48(1) (2006)
  41. "CNOOC to Pay $1.08 Billion for Stake in Texas Shale Gas Project" (2010)[URL]
  42. "The Group of Two that Could Change the World" (2009)[URL]
  43. "Toxic Mood over China’s Investment in the US" (2009)[URL]
  44. "Upstart Chinese Telecom Company Rattles Industry as it Rises to No.2" (2009)[URL]
  45. "China Launches Two-Way Investment Strategy for Better Access to" (2001)[URL]
  46. "Memorandum" (2009)[URL]
  47. "Chinese Withdraw Offer for Nevada Gold Concern" (2009)[URL]
  48. "Spy Chiefs Fear Chinese Cyber Attack" (2009)[URL]
  49. "Britain Could Be Shut Down by Hackers from China, Intelligence Experts Warn" (2009)[URL]
  50. "The Trillion Dollar Question: China or America?" (2009)[URL]
  51. "China Gains Key Assets in Spate of Purchases" (2009)[URL]
  52. 劉小玄, "中國企業發展報告" (2001), 社會科學文獻出版社
  53. 馬建堂, "中國國有企業改革的回顧與展望" (2000), 首都經濟貿易大學出版社
  54. 金碚, "何去何从-当代中国的国有企业冋题" (1997), 今日中国出版社
  55. 谢勇鹏, "从西色国际收购尤金公司被阻看美国的外资并购国家安全审查制度", 资源与产业, 13(2) (2011)
  56. "국가 경제사회 발전을 위한 제12차 5개년 계획(我国国 民经济和社会发展十二五规划纲要)" (2011)[URL]
  57. "중국법률. 外国投资者并购境内企业安全审查制度", ~ (2011)
  58. "미국법률. Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 2007", ~ (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)