발해 영광탑과 한강이남 전탑의 건축형식 비교연구

Abstract

There are a few many brick pagoda in Korean peninsula. Most of brick pagoda is stone made one in stead of real mud. The academic circles of Korean has recognized that brick pagoda is remained south of Han River. But there are remained brick pagoda relics in the northeastern provinces of China. They were the dominion of Goguryo and Balhae's. Young-Gwang pagoda is remained perfectly. He is estimated Balhae's relics. The purpose of this study is to make clear that Balhae's the originality of architectural culture wasn't come under the one side influence of China. First, the range of space is the northeastern China. Until now, it could be seen pagoda relics except there. The south of Han river area is included Dae-gu, An-dong and Yeo-ju and the central districts of Korean peninsula. We would like to concentrate real pagoda such as Song-lim-sa brick pagoda that is compared Balhae's one. Second, the range of contents is conditions of location and the beauty of shape in field of architectural characteristics. They are material, unit plan, standing plan and construction method. Third, we would like to examine the architectural meaning of Balhae's in field the history of architecture throughout compare to the south of Han river brick pagoda. Fourth, the method of this study is as following. At first, we investigate the result of existing study and architectural form. we prepare to comparative method of theoretical basis throughout each area pagoda. Finally, we examine the architectural characteristics of Balhae's brick pagoda throughout compare each area brick pagoda. The Chinese research fruits about Balhae brick pagoda relics has focused on the Tang dynasty culture in exceed. After proceeding study, Balhae has general cultural characteristics in northeast area as well as special cultural ones as seen in many it's cultural relics. The right way of studying Balhae culture is understanding culture and characteristics of relics objectively from Balhae point of view. The East Asian states each interpret history from a self-centered perspective. In the final analysis, we have to consider history as shared heritage rather than a property of individual states.