1930年代“讀經之爭”中的第三種文化抉擇 —以1935年《教育雜誌》關於“讀經”問題的討論為視點
The Third Cultural Choice in the Debate on Reading Classics in 1930s—Taking the Discussion of "Reading Classics" Of Education Magazine in 1935 as the Viewpoint
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
1930年代“讀經之爭”的一個重要變化是，絕對贊成派和絕對反對派都日漸走向邊緣，而兩者之間的折中派，亦即第三種文化抉擇逐漸佔據了歷史舞臺的中心。第三種文化抉擇並非愛抗流俗和高標己見，而是在這場懸而未決的世紀之爭中對於讀經問題採取了更為客觀和理性的態度。其思想表達的客觀性、價值邊界的自恰圓融，在混亂的世風及語境下創制出進退平衡的思想模型。“讀經之爭”中第三種文化抉擇的悄然轉身，對於近世的教育和社會似乎更具現實意義，它表徵著近代思想認識由決絕的尖銳對峙走向了理性與平和，這不僅是一個邏輯過程，同時也是一個歷史過程，或者乾脆說是一個歷史邏輯過程。
Abstract
An important change of the struggle for reading classics in the 1930s was that both the group of absolute consent and the absolute opposition were increasingly marginalized , and the compromise between them, the third cultural choice, gradually occupied the center of the historical stage . The third cultural choice is not to resist vulgar and high standards . The third kind of cultural choice is not to love resisting vulgarity and flaunt lofty opinions , but to adopt a more objective and rational attitude towards the issue of reading the classics in this pending century debate . Its objectivity of thought expression and the self-perfection of value boundary create a balanced ideological model in the chaotic world and context . The quiet turn of cultural choice in the debate on reading classics seems to be of more practical significance to modern education and society . The quiet turn of the third cultural choice in the debate on reading classics seems to be of more practical significance to modern education and society . It indicates that modern ideological cognition has changed from a sharp confrontation to rationality and peace . It is not only a logical process , but also a historical process , or simply a historical logical process .
참고문헌 (28)
- 蔡元培, "蔡元培先生的意見", 教育雜誌, 25(5), pp.47~ (1935)
- 陳朝爵, "陳朝爵先生的意見", 教育雜誌, 25(5), pp.6~7 (1935)
- 陳獨秀, "陳獨秀散文" (2013), 上海科學技術文獻出版社
- 沈善洪, "蔡元培選集上" (1993), 浙江教育出版社
- 餌月巖, "馬克思主義中國化問題研究" (2014), 首都師範大學出版社
- 方天遊, "方天遊先生的意見", 教育雜誌, 25(5), pp.70~ (1935)
- 傅斯年, "中國人的德行 : 論學校讀經" (2011), 中國工人出版社
- 龔鵬程, "讀經有什麼用現代七十二位大家自由談" (2008), 上海人民出版社
- 何炳松, "全國專家對讀經問題的意見", 教育雜誌, 25(5), pp.1~ (1935)
- "教育雜誌"社編輯部, "民國萬象第1輯全國專家對於讀經問題的意見" (2016), 福建教育出版社
- 孟子, "孟子" (2014), 北京時代華文書局
- 李文海, "民國時期社會調查叢編文教事業卷二編" (2014), 福建教育出版社
- 李權時, "李權時先生的意見", 教育雜誌, 25(5), pp.52~ (1935)
- 李蒸, "李蒸先生的意見", 教育雜誌, 25(5), pp.32~ (1935)
- 湯誌鈞, "康有為政論集下" (1998), 中華書局
- 王栻, "嚴複集（第1冊）" (1996), 中華書局
- 王中江, "近代中國思維方式演變的趨勢" (2008), 四川人民出版社
- 熊十力, "讀經示要" (2009), 上海書店出版社
- 楊婷, "䵏年『教育雜誌』讀經專號述評, ｢中國地方教育史誌研究會、《教育史研究》編輯部. 紀念《教育史研究》創刊二十周年論文集（3）——中國教育制度史研究｣" (2009), 中國地方教育史誌研究會
- 趙廷為, "趙廷為先生的意見", 教育雜誌, 25(5), pp.65~90 (1935)
- 朱秉國, "朱秉國先生的意見", 教育雜誌, 25(5), pp.72~ (1935)
- 中華民國教育部, "中華民國教育部普通教育暫行辦法通令", 中華教育界, 1(1), pp.2~ (1912)
- 中華民國教育部, "第壹次中國教育年鑒甲編教育總述" (1934), 開明書店
- Hong Ming, "Centurial Retrospective of the Controversy on Reading Classics", Journal of Educational Studies, 8(1), pp.3~12 (2012)
- Luo YuMing, "The Research of Respecting Confucius and Reading Classics on HuNan Province in 1930s", pp.2003
- Liu XiaoYun, "Reading Classics in Chinese Department of Sun Yat-sen University in 1930s", Journal of Sun Yat-Sen University(Social Science Edition), 48(4), pp.69~80 (2008)
- Yuan YongHong, "On the Advocacy and Debate over Reading Classics in the 1930s", Journal of Historical Science, 7(7), pp.70~75 (2008)
- Zhang SongZhi, "The whole story of Confucianism", Literature, History, and Philosophy, 7(1), pp.70~ (2008)