여격 주어 구문의 갈래와 형성
The classification of the dative subject construction and the condition for forming this construction in Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The aim of this paper is to explain what allows the first NP in the dative subject construction to be marked with the nominative particle or the dative particle, respectively. At first, this paper classifies the dative subject construction in Korean into two sub-constructions such as "the psych adjective construction" and "the possessive predicate construction" based on the theta-roles of the arguments and the lexical-semantic properties of the predicates in these two constructions. In the possessive predicate construction, the first NP can be marked with the dative particle because the theta-role of the first NP is "location" and the dative particle as another locative particle for the animate noun can occurs with the first NP. Furthermore, the first NP can be marked with the nominative particle because it is the subject in a clause. Unlike the possessive predicate construction, in the psych adjective construction, the first NP as the syntactic adjunct can occur with the dative particle which is the oblique particle. In addition, the first NP can be marked with the nominative particle because (i) the theta-role of this NP as "experiencer" is higher than the theta-role of the second NP as "stimulus" in the theta-role hierarchy in Korean, and so (ii) the first NP is easy to be interpreted as the subject. As a result, the case marking of the first NP in the dative subject construction is fully dependent on the theta-roles and the grammatical relations in Korean.
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to explain what allows the first NP in the dative subject construction to be marked with the nominative particle or the dative particle, respectively. At first, this paper classifies the dative subject construction in Korean into two sub-constructions such as "the psych adjective construction" and "the possessive predicate construction" based on the theta-roles of the arguments and the lexical-semantic properties of the predicates in these two constructions. In the possessive predicate construction, the first NP can be marked with the dative particle because the theta-role of the first NP is "location" and the dative particle as another locative particle for the animate noun can occurs with the first NP. Furthermore, the first NP can be marked with the nominative particle because it is the subject in a clause. Unlike the possessive predicate construction, in the psych adjective construction, the first NP as the syntactic adjunct can occur with the dative particle which is the oblique particle. In addition, the first NP can be marked with the nominative particle because (i) the theta-role of this NP as "experiencer" is higher than the theta-role of the second NP as "stimulus" in the theta-role hierarchy in Korean, and so (ii) the first NP is easy to be interpreted as the subject. As a result, the case marking of the first NP in the dative subject construction is fully dependent on the theta-roles and the grammatical relations in Korean.
참고문헌 (17)
- 김건희, "형용사의 주격 중출 구문과 여격 주어 구문에 대하여", 한말연구, (13), pp.1~37 (2003), 한말연구학회
- 남승호, "한국어 술어의 사건 구조와 논항 구조" (2007), 서울대학교 규장각한국학연구원
- 목정수, "-시-에 대한 상념", 통사론 연구회 발표문 (2012)
- 박석준, "여격어를 존대하는 것처럼 보이는 '-시-'문장의 통사구조", 배달말, (31), pp.59~77 (2002), 배달말학회
- 박양규, "소유와 소재", 국어학, (3), pp.93~117 (1975), 국어학회
- 서정수, "국어 문법" (1996), 한양대학교 출판원
- 신선경, "「있다」의 어휘 의미와 통사 구조 연구", 박사, pp.1998
- 이익섭, "피동성 형용사문의 통사 구조", 국어학, (6), pp.65~84 (1978), 국어학회
- 연재훈, "국어 여격주어 구문에 대한 범언어적 관점의 연구", 국어학, (28), pp.241~275 (1996), 국어학회
- 유현경, "국어 형용사 연구" (1998), 연세대학교 언어정보 개발 연구원, 한국문화사
- 전지은, "한국어 형용사 유형 분류와 격틀집합: 세종전자사전을 활용하여", 한국어 의미학, 25, pp.223~251 (2008), 한국어의미학회
- Dowty, David, "Thematic proto-roles and argument selection", Language, 67, pp.547~619 (1991)
- Gerdts, Donna, "Korean psych constructions: Advance -ment or Retreat?", The 24th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 24, pp.155~175 (1992)
- Landau, Idan, "The locative syntax of experiencer", 석사, pp.2002
- Moore, John, "What does it take to be a dative subject?", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 18, pp.373~416 (2000)
- Tantos, Alexandros, "Rhetorical relations in verbal eventual representations? Evidence from psych verbs", Proceedings of the 2004 Texas Linguistic Society Conference, pp.123~156 (2006)
- Talmy, Leonard., "Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. Language typology and syntactic description", Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 3, pp.57~149 (1985)