Categorization of Korean Double Accusative Constructions
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The current study has reviewed Korean double accusative constructions (DACs), which refer to constructions where two NPs marked with -(l)ul appear at the same time in a sentence. It gives a rise to questions which one is a grammatical object and what the other NP is in a sentence. In order to solve these questions, we have classified DACs into four types according to syntactic and semantic/pragmatic perspectives. There are four types of DACs: NP2 as a grammatical object, NP1 as focus or topic ; NP2 as a grammatical object, NP1 as topic; NP1 as a grammatical object, NP2 as a modifier; NP1 as a grammatical object, NP2 as a part of predicate. That is, in the first two types, NP2 is a grammatical object, while in the other two types, NP1 is a grammatical object. Additionally, the NP which is not a grammatical object in the first three types can be left out from a sentence, whereas it is obligatory in the last type.
Abstract
The current study has reviewed Korean double accusative constructions (DACs), which refer to constructions where two NPs marked with -(l)ul appear at the same time in a sentence. It gives a rise to questions which one is a grammatical object and what the other NP is in a sentence. In order to solve these questions, we have classified DACs into four types according to syntactic and semantic/pragmatic perspectives. There are four types of DACs: NP2 as a grammatical object, NP1 as focus or topic ; NP2 as a grammatical object, NP1 as topic; NP1 as a grammatical object, NP2 as a modifier; NP1 as a grammatical object, NP2 as a part of predicate. That is, in the first two types, NP2 is a grammatical object, while in the other two types, NP1 is a grammatical object. Additionally, the NP which is not a grammatical object in the first three types can be left out from a sentence, whereas it is obligatory in the last type.
참고문헌 (20)
- "표준국어대사전" (2019), 국립국어연구원[URL]
- 신서인, "대격 중출 구문에서의 ‘을", 를’의 기능 연구 - 타동성을 중심으로 -, 2016, pp.68, 1~35[DOI]
- 이희자, "사전식 텍스트 분석적 국어 어미의 연구" (1998), 한국문화사
- Ahn, H. -D, "On Light Verb Constructions in Korean and Japanese", Japanese Korean Linguistics, 1, pp.221~237 (1990)
- 최영식, "Verbal Noun in Korean Light Verb Construction Redux", 언어연구, 32(1), pp.115~140 (2016), 한국현대언어학회[DOI]
- 정유진, "A Construction Grammar Approach to Korean Double Accusative Construction", 언어정보, (21), pp.41~66 (2015), 언어정보연구소
- Goldberg, A. E., "Constructions: A construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure" (1995), University of Chicago Press
- Grimshaw, J., "Light Verbs and ɵ-marking", Linguistic Inquiry, 19, pp.205~232 (1988)
- Han, C.-H., "Verb-raising and Grammar Competition in Korean: Evidence from Negation and Quantifier Scope", Linguistic Inquiry, 38(1), pp.1~47 (2007)
- Hopper, P. J., "Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse", Language, 56(2), pp.251~299 (1980)
- Kim, J.-B., "The Syntactic Structures of Korean" (2016), Cambridge University Press
- 권종일, "Middle Field Scrambling as Topicalization", 현대영미어문학, 30(3), pp.151~171 (2012), 현대영미어문학회
- Lee, H., "A Study of Korean Particle Based on the Analysis of Dictionary Text" (1998), Han’guk Munhwasa
- Kyoungmi Lee, "Focus and floating numeral quantifiers in Korean", 석사, Dept. of English Language & Literature, Major in English Linguistics, pp.2013
- 이경미, "Categorization of Double Nominative Constructions in Korean: Based on the Properties of -i", -ka, 2019, pp.32(1), 249~266[DOI]
- Lee, M. -J, "The Light Verb hata Construction and English Loans", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 9, pp.552~562 (2001)
- 박소영, "관형격조사 ‘의’의 두 유형: 속격 표지와 수식 표지로서의 ‘의’", 현대문법연구, (81), pp.1~27 (2014), 현대문법학회[DOI]
- Son, G., "Overt Focus Movement to the Edge of vP", Ms, pp.2012
- 이홍식, "조사 ‘을’의 의미에 대하여", 한국어 의미학, 15, pp.303~327 (2004), 한국어의미학회
- Yoon, James H. S., "The Handbook of Korean Linguistics", pp.79~97 (2015)