Semiotic Analysis of Zhu Xi’s Moral Psychology
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to clarify the theoretic scheme of Zhu Xi's moral psychology from a semiological point of view. According to the author's analysis, Zhu Xi's moral psychology is composed of two different semiotic frames: the horizontal arrangement of li and qi, and the vertical arrangement of li and qi. In Zhu Xi's theoretic scheme, the horizontal frame is applied to describe the ambivalent relationship between li (i.e. moral dispositions) and qi (i.e. non-moral dispositions), while the vertical frame is applied to explain the ontological relationship in which li (i.e. metaphysical principle) supervenes on qi (i.e. constitutive matter). While Toegye, by adopting the horizontal frame, tried to depict the ambivalent relationship between li (i.e. moral dispositions) and qi (i.e. non-moral dispositions); Kobong and Yulgok, by adopting the vertical frame, tried to explain the ontological relationship in which li (i.e. metaphysical principle) supervenes on qi (i.e. constitutive matter). The seeming discord of two semiotic frames made Chosŏn Neo-Confucian scholars split into two antagonistic groups. In this paper, the author, by explicating the two frames that Zhu Xi adopted, tries to lay a cornerstone to understand the reason why Toegye School and Yulgok School couldn't help but fall into never-ending controversy.
Abstract
This paper aims to clarify the theoretic scheme of Zhu Xi's moral psychology from a semiological point of view. According to the author's analysis, Zhu Xi's moral psychology is composed of two different semiotic frames: the horizontal arrangement of li and qi, and the vertical arrangement of li and qi. In Zhu Xi's theoretic scheme, the horizontal frame is applied to describe the ambivalent relationship between li (i.e. moral dispositions) and qi (i.e. non-moral dispositions), while the vertical frame is applied to explain the ontological relationship in which li (i.e. metaphysical principle) supervenes on qi (i.e. constitutive matter). While Toegye, by adopting the horizontal frame, tried to depict the ambivalent relationship between li (i.e. moral dispositions) and qi (i.e. non-moral dispositions); Kobong and Yulgok, by adopting the vertical frame, tried to explain the ontological relationship in which li (i.e. metaphysical principle) supervenes on qi (i.e. constitutive matter). The seeming discord of two semiotic frames made Chosŏn Neo-Confucian scholars split into two antagonistic groups. In this paper, the author, by explicating the two frames that Zhu Xi adopted, tries to lay a cornerstone to understand the reason why Toegye School and Yulgok School couldn't help but fall into never-ending controversy.
참고문헌 (6)
- Anon, "Shangsh 尙書 (Classics of History)"
- Lee Seung-hwan, "Namdang’s Theory of Supervenience and His Vertical Frame", Studies of Asian Philosophy, 45 (2012)
- Si, Ma-quan, "Shi Ji 史記 (Record of History)", ~
- Zhu, Xi, "Zhuzi daquan 朱子大全 (Great Compendium of the Works of Master Zhu), In Sibu beiyao (Essentials of the Four Libraries)" (1970), Zhonghua Shuju
- Zhu, Xi, ". 8 vols" (1986), Zhonghua Shuju
- Zhu, Xi, (1996), Sichuan Jiaoyu Chubanshe
