한국과 스웨덴의 기본소득제 도입 가상(假想)상황 비교
Comparing the Application situations of Basic Income Program to Korea and Sweden
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Recently it is being insisted that the basic income program be introduced in Korea. We can imagine two kinds of the feasible basic income programs. One is the simple basic income programs, replacing the existing social benefits. The other one is the supplementary one, supplementing the existing social benefits. If the simple basic income program were put into practice, people would enjoy income security without exception, the level of income security would be higher and the efficiency for mobilization and distribution of resources would increase. But the social benefit for the industrial accident workers would be decreased too much. If the supplementary basic income program were put into operation, the merits of the simple basic income program would be sustained and the demerits would disappear. But, compared with even for current income security system of Sweden, it would have many problems. The replacement rate of the existing income by the social benefits would be too low. The minimum living standard of all people would not be guaranteed because of the high private share of cost for medical service and so forth.
Abstract
Recently it is being insisted that the basic income program be introduced in Korea. We can imagine two kinds of the feasible basic income programs. One is the simple basic income programs, replacing the existing social benefits. The other one is the supplementary one, supplementing the existing social benefits. If the simple basic income program were put into practice, people would enjoy income security without exception, the level of income security would be higher and the efficiency for mobilization and distribution of resources would increase. But the social benefit for the industrial accident workers would be decreased too much. If the supplementary basic income program were put into operation, the merits of the simple basic income program would be sustained and the demerits would disappear. But, compared with even for current income security system of Sweden, it would have many problems. The replacement rate of the existing income by the social benefits would be too low. The minimum living standard of all people would not be guaranteed because of the high private share of cost for medical service and so forth.
참고문헌 (11)
- 박홍규, "기본소득(Basic Income) 연구", 민주법학, (36), pp.123~146 (2008), 민주주의법학연구회
- 이명현, "유럽에서의 기본소득(Basic Income) 구상의 전개 동향과", 사회보장연구, 23(3), pp.147~169 (2007), 한국사회보장학회
- 곽노완, "기본소득과 사회연대소득의 경제철학", 시대와 철학, 18(2), pp.183~218 (2007), 한국철학사상연구회
- 한국의 기본소득제도 도입전략, "강남훈", 민노총정책연구원, ~ (2008)
- 김교성, "기본소득 도입을 위한 탐색적 연구", 사회복지정책, 36(2), pp.33~57 (2009), 한국사회복지정책학회
- 채구묵, "스웨덴 사회복지의 실제" (2007), 양서원
- Philippe Van Parijs, "Basic Income: A Simple and Powerful Idea for Twenty-first Century", Politics & Society, 32(1), pp.7~39 (2004)
- "2010년 기초노령연금사업안내, 2010년 국민기초생활급여 수급자 현황 - 제목" (2010)[URL]
- "2009년 국민기초생활급여 총액"[URL]
