교수자 가이드에 기반한 자기수정 사례연구
A Case Study on Guided Self-Correction as a Post-translation Activity
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Learning how to translate a text involves not only the acquisition of linguistic or transfer competence. It also requires students to understand translation strategies and to select the strategy appropriate to the situational and textual contexts. Therefore, a translation class needs to provide an environment in which a student can take action, receive a reaction, and draw learning in a consistent manner. With this understanding, the present study aimed to explore the benefits of guided self-correction as one of the activities during the reaction phase. Whereas students generally translate a text (the action), and others, either a teacher or peers, react to the translation, this study assumed that self-correction can also serve as an effective reaction activity, which may not only help students improve their translation, but more importantly nurture their meta-cognition. Reviewing what students corrected and why, this study found that, even with only the simplest guidance, students were able to identify problems and areas for further improvement in their own translations, and to endeavor to make them better. Certainly, issues indicating potential difficulties that are less marked are not as easily identified as those that are more marked, such as conjunctions and inanimate subjects. Moreover, students were found to achieve different levels of correction, despite identifying the same problem. However, such findings do not indicate limitations to guided self-correction. Rather, the findings suggest the possibility of understanding various types of translation problems that may be commonly experienced, and of identifying individual students who are not gaining optimal advantage of guidance given in class, and who may therefore require a more personalized approach from the teacher.
Abstract
Learning how to translate a text involves not only the acquisition of linguistic or transfer competence. It also requires students to understand translation strategies and to select the strategy appropriate to the situational and textual contexts. Therefore, a translation class needs to provide an environment in which a student can take action, receive a reaction, and draw learning in a consistent manner. With this understanding, the present study aimed to explore the benefits of guided self-correction as one of the activities during the reaction phase. Whereas students generally translate a text (the action), and others, either a teacher or peers, react to the translation, this study assumed that self-correction can also serve as an effective reaction activity, which may not only help students improve their translation, but more importantly nurture their meta-cognition. Reviewing what students corrected and why, this study found that, even with only the simplest guidance, students were able to identify problems and areas for further improvement in their own translations, and to endeavor to make them better. Certainly, issues indicating potential difficulties that are less marked are not as easily identified as those that are more marked, such as conjunctions and inanimate subjects. Moreover, students were found to achieve different levels of correction, despite identifying the same problem. However, such findings do not indicate limitations to guided self-correction. Rather, the findings suggest the possibility of understanding various types of translation problems that may be commonly experienced, and of identifying individual students who are not gaining optimal advantage of guidance given in class, and who may therefore require a more personalized approach from the teacher.
참고문헌 (37)
- 최철용, "교육심리학" (2007), 서울:서현사
- 김양희, "The effectiveness of diverse types of written feedback: Comparative study of teacher and student feedback.", 영어어문교육, 16(4), pp.133~152 (2010), 한국영어어문교육학회
- 김판수, "구성주의와 교과 교육" (2000), 학지사
- 김한식, "통번역대학원 학생들의 학습자심리", 통번역학연구, 16(4), pp.129~144 (2012), 통번역연구소
- 박소연, "교사 피드백과 동료 피드백의 비교 연구", 석사, 영어교육, pp.2007
- 백순근, "수행평가 : 이론적 측면" (2002), 교육과학사
- 백영균, "교육방법 및 교육 공학" (2010), 학지사
- 손태호, "한국 고등학생 영어 쓰기 수업에서 동료 피드백과 교사 피드백의 효과 비교 연구", 석사, 영어교육, pp.2007
- 이계연, "실제적인 번역교수법, 무엇을 선택할 것인가? 자가감수와 피드백을 중심으로", 통역번역연구소 논문집, 6, pp.103~124 (2003)
- 이계훈, "피드백 제공 빈도의 차이가 수행과 정서 반응에 미치는 효과 비교", 박사, 심리학과 산업및조직심리학전공, pp.2014
- 이미경, "학부과정 번역수업에서의 피드백 방법에 따른 효과 및 학습자의 피드백 인식 비교", 번역학연구, 12(3), pp.141~168 (2011), 한국번역학회
- 이재기, "교수 첨삭 담화의 유형과 양상 분석", 한민족어문학(구 영남어문학), (57), pp.557~597 (2010), 한민족어문학회
- 이향, "번역물 감수의 심층분석을 통한 번역교육 응용방안 연구", 박사, 통역번역학, pp.2006
- 전은영, "동료 피드백 활동이 고등학생의 영어 쓰기 능력 향상에 미치는 영향", 석사, 영어교육전공, pp.2013
- 정양수, "영어쓰기 과정에서 제공되는 피드백의 유형과 제공방법에 대한 학습자의 요구분석 연구", 현대영미어문학, 30(1), pp.31~56 (2012), 현대영미어문학회
- 정영철, "통합적 접근: 영어 글쓰기 수업에서의 피드백주기 방식에 대한 대학생들의 인식", 현대영미어문학, 32(1), pp.79~101 (2014), 현대영미어문학회
- 조영남, "한국인 초급 일본어 작문에서 교사와 학습자간의 오류 피드백의 프로세스", 일본문화연구, (49), pp.327~344 (2014), 동아시아일본학회[DOI]
- 진제희, "한국어 수업에 나타난 교사의 수정적 피드백과 학습자 반응 연구", 이중언어학, (28), pp.371~390 (2005), 이중언어학회
- Bachman, L. F., "The construct validation of self-rating of communicative language ability", Language Testing, 6(1), pp.14~25 (1989)
- Cohen, A. D., "Learner Strategies in Language Learning", pp.57~69 (1987), Prentice Hall
- Galán-Mañas, A., "Blended learning in translator training : methodology and results of an empirical validation", The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 4(2), pp.197~231 (2010)
- Ellis, R., "Second Language Acquisition" (1997), Oxford University Press
- Hartshorn, K. J., "The effects of manageable corrective feedback on ESL writing accuracy" (2008), Bringham Young
- "University. Doctorial dissertation"[URL]
- Kiraly, B., "A Social Constructivist Approach to Translator Education; Empowerment from Theory to Practice" (2000), St Jerome Publishing
- Lee, Y. H., "Self assessment in interpreter training: student-teacher interface model of assessment", 박사, pp.2009
- Leki, I., "Potential problems with peer responding in ESL writing classes", CATESOL Journal, 3, pp.5~19 (1990)
- Li, Defening, "Project-based learning in teaching translation : student's perceptions", The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 9(1), pp.1~19 (2015)
- Lightbown, P. M,, "How Languages Are Learned" (2006), Oxford University Press
- Little, D., "Learning as dialogue : the dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy", Systems, 23(2), pp.175~181 (1996)
- Liu, J., "The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, pp.193~227 (2003)
- Mohammadi, M., "Recast and metalinguistic feedback in teaching and learning L2 writing : a comparative study", The Journal of Asia TEFL, 6(3), pp.227~244 (2009)
- Russo, M., "Self-evaluation: the awareness of one's own difficulties as a training tool for simultaneous interpretation", Interpreter's Newsletter, 6, pp.75~84 (1995)
- Tao, Y., "Toward a constructive model in training professional translators", Babel, 58(3), pp.289~308 (2012)
- Vienne, J., "Towards a pedagogy of 'translation in situation'", Perspectives, 2(1), pp.51~59 (1994)
- Wills, W., "Knowledge and Skills in Translator Behavior" (1996), John Benjamins
- Yang, P., "Enhancing intercultural communication and understanding : team translation project as a student engagement learning approach", International Education Studies, 8(8), pp.67~80 (2015)