창작물에 의한 번역 표절과 저작권 보호: 신경숙 作 ‘전설’의 미시마 유키오 譯 ‘우국’ 표절 논란을 중심으로
Plagiarism of Translations by Creative Writing, and Protection of Translators’ Copyrights: On the Controversy over Shin Kyung-sook's Legend and Yukio Mishima’s Short Story
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Park, Ji-Young. (2018). Plagiarism of Translations by Creative Writing, and Protection of Translators’ Copyrights: On Controversy over Shin Kyung-sook's Legend and Yukio Mishima’s Short Story. Interpreting and Translation Studies 22(2), 77-100 This study analyzes the controversy that Shin Kyong-sook plagiarized Yukio Mishima’s Short Story when writing her novel, Legend, from a perspective of translators’ copyright protection. Opinions are divided over whether Shin’s Legend is a plagiarized work, with no clear solutions proposed to plagiarism as of yet. Furthermore, little attention has been paid in the controversy to the fact that the subject of plagiarism was a “translation”. Therefore, this paper attempts to propose a solution to such controversies. To this end, this study took note that the court rules on plagiarism disputes based on “comprehensive non-literal similarity” and “fragmented literal similarity”. After observing how the two criteria were imposed in a court ruling on the purported plagiarism of a translation by a creative writing, the paper applied the criteria in the same way that the court followed, leading to the conclusion that the Shin’s Legend is likely to be ruled not having plagiarized Yukio Mishima’s Short Story. Therefore, the paper proposes the introduction of tiered-licenses for translation reproduction as a solution, which would address such plagiarism controversies, promote the re-use of translations and further strengthen translators’ copyrights.
Abstract
Park, Ji-Young. (2018). Plagiarism of Translations by Creative Writing, and Protection of Translators’ Copyrights: On Controversy over Shin Kyung-sook's Legend and Yukio Mishima’s Short Story. Interpreting and Translation Studies 22(2), 77-100 This study analyzes the controversy that Shin Kyong-sook plagiarized Yukio Mishima’s Short Story when writing her novel, Legend, from a perspective of translators’ copyright protection. Opinions are divided over whether Shin’s Legend is a plagiarized work, with no clear solutions proposed to plagiarism as of yet. Furthermore, little attention has been paid in the controversy to the fact that the subject of plagiarism was a “translation”. Therefore, this paper attempts to propose a solution to such controversies. To this end, this study took note that the court rules on plagiarism disputes based on “comprehensive non-literal similarity” and “fragmented literal similarity”. After observing how the two criteria were imposed in a court ruling on the purported plagiarism of a translation by a creative writing, the paper applied the criteria in the same way that the court followed, leading to the conclusion that the Shin’s Legend is likely to be ruled not having plagiarized Yukio Mishima’s Short Story. Therefore, the paper proposes the introduction of tiered-licenses for translation reproduction as a solution, which would address such plagiarism controversies, promote the re-use of translations and further strengthen translators’ copyrights.
참고문헌 (40)
- 김기태, "출판 저작권" (2013), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 김정우, "조선 시대 번역의 사회문화적 기능", 번역학연구, 10(1), pp.33~63 (2009), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 김종보, "지적재산권 강화경향과 정보공유와의 관계에 대한 고찰", 법학연구, 46(1), pp.89~121 (2005)
- 김균, "미국의 대외 문화정책을 통해 본 미군정 문화정책", 한국언론학보, 44(3), pp.40~75 (2000)
- 김혜정, "대중음악 2차적 저작물에 관한 저작권법상 쟁점과 고찰", 문화산업연구, 16(1), pp.109~115 (2016), 한국문화산업학회
- 박지영, "저작권법의 관점에서 본 번역의 창작성", 통번역학연구, 21(4), pp.1~28 (2017), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 박찬효, "표절", pp.273~300 (2007), 집문당
- 방민호, "좌담 한국문학 어디에 서 있나?", 서정시학, (겨울), pp.17~18 (2015)
- 백영서, "표절과 문학권력 논란을 겪으며", 창작과비평, 43(3), pp.2~7 (2015)
- 신경숙, "오래전 집을 떠날 때", pp.105~170 (1996), 창작과 비평사
- 영미문학연구회 번역평가사업단, "좋은 번역을 찾아서" (2005), 창비
- 유희석, "‘신경숙 표절사태’와 비평", 비평과이론, 21(2), pp.23~57 (2016), 한국비평이론학회
- 윤선경, "창작과 번역의 모호한 경계", 외국문학연구, (61), pp.237~256 (2016), 외국문학연구소
- 윤지관, "문학의 법정과 비판의 윤리", 창작과비평, 169(가을), pp.348~380 (2015)
- 윤지관, "문학에서 표절에 관한 몇 가지 이론적 쟁점: 신경숙, 박민규의 경우", 비평과이론, 21(2), pp.5~22 (2016), 한국비평이론학회
- 이성혁, "‘신경숙 표절 논란’과 재점화된 문학권력 비판에 부쳐", 진보평론, 65, pp.126~144 (2015)
- 정문순, "통념의 내면화, 자기 위안의 글쓰기", 문예 중앙, (가을) (2000), 중앙 M&B
- 정상조, "저작권법" (2015), 방송통신대학교 출판부
- 정혜용, "번역, 공동의 글쓰기- 표절 현상 속의 번역 규범", 비교한국학 Comparative Korean Studies, 22(1), pp.55~74 (2014), 국제비교한국학회
- 최두진, "편집저작물에 관한 법적 고찰", 법학연구, 12(2), pp.239~278 (2009), 법학연구소
- 프랑스 명작소설 번역평가 결과보고서, "프랑스 명작소설 번역평가 사업단", ~ (2011)
- 미시마 유키오, "우국(憂國): 金閣寺, 憂國, 연회는 끝나고" (1983), 주우
- Basalamah, S., "Copyright law and translation:Crossing epistemologies", The Translator, 20(3), pp.396~410 (2014)
- Bassnett, S., "The Translator as Writer", pp.173~183 (2006), Continuum
- Benjamin, W., "Theories of Translation: An Anthology of Essays from Dryden to Derrida" (1992), Univeristy of Chicago Publishing
- Posner, R. A., (2009), 산지니
- Venuti, L., "Translation, Authorship, Copyright", The Translator, 1(1), pp.1~24 (1995)
- "한식세계화 이끌 '한식재단' 출범" (2010)[URL]
- "국민소득 3만 달러 근접... 성장률 3%대 회복" (2018)[URL]
- "소설가 이응준 "신경숙, 미시마 유키오의 '우국' 표절"주장" (2015)[URL]
- "2005다44138 판결" (2007)[URL]
- "'선덕여왕' 표절 사건. 한국저작권위원회" (2013)[URL]
- "표절 논의, 공격 수단 사용... 비전문가들 나서 문제"[URL]
- "인정사정 볼 것 없다: 표절이나 아니냐 그것이 문제가아니로다" (2000)[URL]
- "우상의 어둠, 문학의 타락: 신경숙의 미시마 유키오 표절" (2015)[URL]
- "한강 '흰', 맨부커 최종후보 지명... 또 수상할까" (2018)[URL]
- "표절을 보호해야 한다" (2015)[URL]
- "'표절논란' 소설가 신경숙 '출판사 업무방해' 무혐의" (2016)[URL]
- "취재파일:신경숙 작가 표절 논란 정리(1)... 뚜렷한 의혹과 모호한 해명" (2015)[URL]
- "이슈: 신경숙 '표절 의혹' 확산, "문학이란 땅에서 넘어졌으니까 그 땅을 짚고 일어나겠다"" (2015)[URL]