원자력 입지갈등 해소를 위한 조건적 원자력 수용성의 확장 및 영향요인 분석

키워드

참고문헌 (86)

1. 김경신, "중･저준위 방사성 폐기물 처분장 입지선정과정에 나타난 위험･이익인식과 입지수용성 분석 - 부안과 경주의 설치･유치지역을 중심으로 -", 한국정책학회보, 23(1), pp.313~342 (2014), 한국정책학회
2. 김근식, "원전지역 주민들의 다차원적 원자력수용성 결정요인에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2016
3. 김근식, "원자력 발전소 연장운행의 정치경제학: 원전주변지역주민들의 경제적, 정치적 차별지각을 중심으로", 지방행정연구, 29(4), pp.295~336 (2015), (재) 한국지방행정연구원[DOI]
4. 김대중, "인지 및 감정 요인이원자력발전의 개인적ㆍ사회적 수용성에 미치는영향력 차이에 관한 비교 연구 : 원전 홍보방안 수립에 주는 시사점 탐색을 중심으로", 한국언론학보, 57(5), pp.214~238 (2013), 한국언론학회
5. 김도희, "지방정부와 주민간 입지갈등의 갈등유발요인에 관한 연구: 울산원자력발전소를 중심으로", 한국정책학회보, 10(1), pp.165~188 (2001)
6. 김서용, "위험과 편익을 넘어서: 원자력발전소 수용성에 대한 경험적 감정의 휴리스틱 효과", 한국행정학보, 41(3), pp.373~398 (2007), 한국행정학회
7. 김서용, "후쿠시마 원전사고 이후 세계인의 원자력 수용성 태도변화 분석", 한국정책학회보, 23(3), pp.57~90 (2014), 한국정책학회
8. 김서용, "위험사회와 에너지 체제 전환: 에너지 선호구조 분석 및 정책적 함의", 행정논총, 54(2), pp.287~318 (2016), 한국행정연구소
9. 김창수, "후쿠시마 원전 사고 후 방사선 및 원전에 대한 인식 분석", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 13(9), pp.281~287 (2013), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
10. 송해룡, "원전주변 지역주민의 위험지각이 위험태도와 위험수용에 미치는 영향", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 12(6), pp.238~248 (2012), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
11. 심준섭, "원자력 발전소에 대한 신뢰, 인식된 위험과 혜택, 그리고 수용성", 한국정책학회보, 18(4), pp.93~132 (2009), 한국정책학회
12. 왕재선, "후쿠시마 원전사고 이후 원자력 수용성 및 인식구조 변화에 대한 탐색적 분석", 한국행정학보, 47(2), pp.395~424 (2013), 한국행정학회
13. 김서용, "후쿠시마 원전사고에 대한 한국민의 위험판단 과정에 대한 분석: 휴리스틱-체계적 모형(HSM)에서 정보수신자의 관여와 능력의 역할을 중심으로", 정부학연구, 20(3), pp.315~343 (2014), 정부학연구소[DOI]
14. 유해운, "비선호시설 입지접근방식의 분석", 한국지방자치학회보, 8(2), pp.199~224 (1996)
15. 이나경, "방폐장 입지에 관한 의사결정에 영향을 미치는 변수", 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 17(4), pp.461~475 (2005), 한국인지및생물심리학회
16. 이민재, "원자력 발전의 위험인식, 효용인식, 투명성이 사회적 수용성에 미치는 영향", 기업경영연구, 21(4), pp.253~279 (2014), 한국기업경영학회
17. 이상팔, "지역주민의 위험정책 수용과 절차적･분배적 형평성의 역할 – 방사성폐기물처분장 부지선정과정을 중심으로", 원자력산업, 15(12), pp.35~49 (1995)
18. 정주용, "정책수용성 급반전현상에 관한 연구 : 방사성폐기물처리장 입지정책을 중심으로", 박사, 행정학, pp.2008
19. 조성경, "원자력시설 및 정책의 수용성에 영향을 미치는 인식인자 도출에 관한 이론적 고찰", 에너지공학, 11(4), pp.1~12 (2002), 한국에너지학회
20. 채경석, "혐오시설의 입지갈등과 정책수용성: 방사성 폐기물 처분장 사례를 중심으로", 서석사회과학논총, 2(2), pp.231~263 (2009)
21. 최연홍, "정책 수용성의 시간적 변화: 위도 방사성폐기물 처분방 입지 갈등 사례", 한국정책학회보, 13(1), pp.297~319 (2004), 한국정책학회
22. Adamantiades, A., "Nuclear power for sustainable development:current status and future prospects", Energy Policy, 37, pp.5149~5166 (2009)
23. Alhakami, A. S., "A Psychological Study of the Inverse Relationship Between Perceived Risk and Perceived Benefits", Risk Analysis, 14(6), pp.1085~1096 (1994)
24. Bacot, H., "Managing the solid waste crisis", Policy Studies Journal, 22(2), pp.229~244 (1994)
25. Bickerstaff, K., "Reframing nuclear power in the UK energy debate: nuclear power, climate change mitigation and radioactive waste", Public understanding of science, 17(2), pp.145~169 (2008)
26. Bird, D. K., "Nuclear Power in Australia: A Comparative Analysis of Public Opinion Regarding Climate Change and the Fukushima Disaster", Energy Policy, 64, pp.644~653 (2013)
27. Brody, C. J., "Differences by Sex in Support for Nuclear Power", Social Forces, 63(1), pp.209~228 (1984)
28. Bronfman, N. C., "An empirical study for the direct and indirect links between trust in regulatory institutions and acceptability of hazards", Safety Science, 47(5), pp.686~692 (2009)
29. Chalvatzis, K. J., "Energy security vs. climate change: Theorial framework development and experience in selected EU electricity markets", Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, pp.2703~2709 (2009)
30. Chung, J. B., "Competition, Economic Benefits, Trust, and Risk Perception in Siting a Potentially Hazardous Facility", Landscape and Urban Planning, 91(1), pp.8~16 (2009)
31. Chung, J. B., "Analysis of local acceptance of a radioactive waste disposal facility", Risk Analysis, 28(4), pp.1021~1032 (2008)
32. Corner, A., "Nuclear power, climate change and energy security: Exploring British public attitudes", Energy Policy, 39, pp.4823~4833 (2011)
33. De Groot, J. I., "Relationships between value orientations, selfdetermined motivational types and pro-environmental behavioural intentions", Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), pp.368~378 (2010)
34. Demski, C., "Exploring public perceptions of energy security risk in the UK", Energy Policy, 66, pp.369~378 (2014)
35. Eurobarometer, "Energy Technologies: Knowledge, Perception, Measures EUR 22396", European Commission, ~ (2006)
36. Attitudes on issues related to EU Energy Policy —Analytic report Flash Eurobarometer 206a, "Eurobarometer", European Commission, ~ (2007)
37. Finucane, M. L., "The Affect Heuristic in Judgement of Risks and Benefits", Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(1), pp.1~17 (2000)
38. Finucane, M. L., "Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research", pp.327~364 (2003), Cambridge University Press
39. Fischhoff, B., "How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits", Policy Sciences, 9(2), pp.127~152 (1978)
40. Flynn, J., "Trust as a Determinant of Opposition to High-level Radioactive Waste Repository: Analysis of a Structural Model", Risk Analysis, 12, pp.417~429 (1992)
41. Flynn, J., "Gender, Race, and Perception of Environmental Health Risks", Risk Analysis, 14(6), pp.1101~1108 (1994)
42. Frey, B. S., "The Old Lady Visits Your Backyard: A Tale of Morals and Markets", The Journal of Political Economy, 104(6), pp.1297~1313 (1996)
43. Gardner, G. T., "Risk and Benefit Perceptions, Acceptability Judgments, and Self-reported Actions toward Nuclear Power", The Journal of Social Psychology, 116(2), pp.179~197 (1982)
44. Gregory, R., "Incentives policies to site hazardous waste facilities", Risk Analysis, 11(4), pp.667~675 (1991)
45. Evaluating nuclear power: voter choice on the California nuclear energy initiative, "Hensler, D. R.", RAND Corp., ~, pp.Final report No. PB-80-171358 (1979)
46. Jenkins‐Smith, H., "Mitigation and benefits measures as policy tools for siting potentially hazardous facilities: Determinants of effectiveness and appropriateness", Risk Analysis, 21(2), pp.371~382 (2001)
47. UNM Mitigation, "Compensation Survey", Jenkins-Smith, Hank, 1993
48. Kato, T., "A case study of economic incentives and local citizens' attitudes toward hosting a nuclear power plant in Japan: Impacts of the Fukushima accident", Energy Policy, 59, pp.808~818 (2013)
49. Keller, C., "Affective imagery and acceptance of replacing nuclear power plants", Risk Analysis, 32(3), pp.464~477 (2012)
50. Kunreuther, H., "Public attitudes toward siting a high‐level nuclear waste repository in Nevada", Risk Analysis, 10(4), pp.469~484 (1990)
51. Kunreuther, Howard, "The role of compensation in siting hazardous facilities", Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 15(4), pp.601~622 (1996)
52. Climate change in the American Mind: Americans’ global warming beliefs and attitudes in June 2010., Yale University and George Mason University, "Leiserowitz, A.", Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, ~ (2010)
53. Lesbirel, S. H., "Managing conflict in facility siting: An international comparison" (2005), Edward Elgar Publishing
54. Levi, D. J., "Nuclear power: The dynamics of acceptability", Environment and Behavior, 18(3), pp.385~395 (1986)
55. Loewenstein, G. F., "Risk as feelings", Psychological bulletin, 127(2), pp.267~ (2001)
56. Lorenzoni, I., "Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives", Climatic Change, 77, pp.73~95 (2006)
57. Matthews, M. L., "Age differences in male drivers' perception of accident risk: The role of perceived driving ability", Accident Analysis & Prevention, 18(4), pp.299~313 (1986)
58. McDaniels, T. L., "Risk perception and the value of safety", Risk Analysis, 12(4), pp.495~503 (1992)
59. O'Hare, M., "Facility Siting and Public Opposition" (1983), Van Nostrand Reinhold
60. Peters, E., "The springs of action: Affective and analytical information processing in choice", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(12), pp.1465~1475 (2000)
61. Pidgeon, N. F., "Climate change or nuclear power – No thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain", Global Environmental Change, 18, pp.69~85 (2008)
62. Poortinga, W., "Public perceptions of climate change and energy futures before and after the Fukushima accident: A comparison between Britain and Japan", Energy Policy, 62, pp.1204~1211 (2013)
63. Public Perceptions of Nuclear Power, Climate Change and Energy Options in Britain: Summary Findings of a Survey Conducted during October and November 2005, "Poortinga, W.", Centre for Environmental Risk, ~, pp.Technical Report Understanding Risk Working Paper 06-02 (2005)
64. Siegrist, M., "Acceptance of Nuclear Power: The Fukushima Effect", Energy Policy, 59, pp.112~119 (2013)
65. Siegrist, M., "Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge", Risk analysis, 20(5), pp.713~720 (2000)
66. Sjöberg, L., "Explaining individual risk perception: the case of nuclear waste", Risk Management, 6(1), pp.51~64 (2004)
67. Slimak, M. W., "Personal values, beliefs, and ecological risk perception", Risk analysis, 26(6), pp.1689~1705 (2006)
68. Slovic, P., "Perceived Risk, Trust, and Democracy", Risk Analysis, 13(6), pp.675~682 (1993)
69. Slovic, P., "Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the riskassessment battlefield", Risk analysis, 19(4), pp.689~701 (1999)
70. Slovic, P., "Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality", Risk analysis, 24(2), pp.311~322 (2004)
71. Slovic, P., "Accident probabilities and seat belt usage: A psychological perspective", Accident Analysis & Prevention, 10(4), pp.281~285 (1978)
72. Slovic, P., "Perceived Risk, Stigma, and Potential Economic Impacts of a High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository in Nevada", Risk Analysis, 11, pp.683~696 (1991)
73. Spence, A., "Public perceptions of energy choices: The influence of beliefs about climate change and the environment", Environment and Energy, 21(5), pp.384~407 (2010)
74. Starr, C., "Social benefit versus technological risk", Science, 165, pp.1232~1238 (1969)
75. Steger, M. A. E., "Gender differences in environmental orientations:a comparison of publics and activists in Canada and the US", Western Political Quarterly, 42(4), pp.627~649 (1989)
76. Tanaka, Y., "Major factors of deciding public acceptance of a variety of technology", Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(1), pp.111~117 (1995)
77. Tanaka, Y., "Major psychological factors determining public acceptance of the siting of nuclear facilities", Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(6), pp.1147~1165 (2004)
78. Teräväinen, T., "Climate change, energy security, and risk—debating nuclear new build in Finland, France and the UK", Energy Policy, 39(6), pp.3434~3442 (2011)
79. Terwel, B. W., "Public responses to community compensation: the importance of prior consultations with local residents", Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 24(6), pp.479~490 (2014)
80. Upham, P., "A Research Synthesis for the Living with Environmental Change Programme" (2009), Research Councils UK
81. Venables, D., "Living with Nuclear Power: AQ‐Method Study of Local Community Perceptions", Risk Analysis, 29(8), pp.1089~1104 (2009)
82. Visschers, V. H. M., "Acceptance of nuclear power: The Fukushima effect", Energy Policy, 59, pp.112~119 (2013)
83. Visschers, V. H. M., "Climate change benefits and energy supply benefits as determinants of acceptance of nuclear power stations: Investigating an explanatory model", Energy Policy, 39, pp.3621~3629 (2011)
84. Whitfield, S. C., "The future of nuclear power:Value orientations and risk perception", Risk Analysis, 29(3), pp.425~437 (2009)
85. Williams, B. L., "Determinants Of Trust Perceptions Among Residents Surrounding The Savannah River Nuclear Weapons Site", Environment and Behavior, 31(3), pp.354~371 (1999)
86. Yamamura, E., "Experience of Technological and Natural Disaster and their Impact on the Perceived Risk of Nuclear Accidents After the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster in Japan 2011: A Cross-country Analysis", The Journal of Socio-Economics, 41, pp.360~363 (2012)

관련 논문AI추천