본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

문학연구방법론에 대한 단상—저자, 텍스트, 사회

A Thought on Literary Study: Author, Text, and Society

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Russian Formalism and Marxism look, at first glance, like opposites of each other: the former is about “form,” concerned with the aesthetic value of artistic work, while the latter is about “content,” concentrating on the ideology of literature. The former tends to find the values of a work within the work itself, and the latter emphasizes a moralistic and utilitarian view of art. The difference can be summarized as intrinsic versus extrinsic. Despite these seemingly opposite standpoints in their basic attitudes, Russian Formalism and Marxism, as dueling theories under the same historical circumstance, influenced each other greatly. Throughout the history of literary criticism, members of Russian Formalism and Marxism have attempted to reconcile the former's emphasis on the artistic device with the latter’s dialectics. In this regard, Mikhail Bakhtin’s achievements in “translinguistics” or “historical poetics” were crucial to this reconciling movement.

Abstract

Russian Formalism and Marxism look, at first glance, like opposites of each other: the former is about “form,” concerned with the aesthetic value of artistic work, while the latter is about “content,” concentrating on the ideology of literature. The former tends to find the values of a work within the work itself, and the latter emphasizes a moralistic and utilitarian view of art. The difference can be summarized as intrinsic versus extrinsic. Despite these seemingly opposite standpoints in their basic attitudes, Russian Formalism and Marxism, as dueling theories under the same historical circumstance, influenced each other greatly. Throughout the history of literary criticism, members of Russian Formalism and Marxism have attempted to reconcile the former's emphasis on the artistic device with the latter’s dialectics. In this regard, Mikhail Bakhtin’s achievements in “translinguistics” or “historical poetics” were crucial to this reconciling movement.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. Abrams, M. H, "he Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition" (1979), Oxford UP
  2. Abrams, M. H, "A Glossary of Literary Terms" (2012), Wadsworth
  3. Aristotle, "U of Michigan P" (1970)
  4. Bakhtin, Mikhail, "Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics" (1984), U of Minnesota P
  5. Bate, W. J, "Criticism: The Major Texts" (1970), Harcourt
  6. Bennett, Tony, "Formalism and Marxism" (1979), Methuen
  7. Erlich, Victor, "Russian Formalism: History-Doctrine" (1981), Yale UP
  8. Horace, "Art of Poetry", pp.49~58, Bate
  9. Selden, Roman, "A Reader's Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory" (1985), Harvester
  10. Sidney, Sir Philip, "An Apology for Poetry", pp.82~106, Bate
  11. Todorov, Tzvetan, "Mikhail Bakhtin: The Dialogical Principle" (1984), U of Minnesota P
  12. Volosinov, V. N, "Marxism and the Philosophy of Language" (1973), Harvard UP

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)