문학번역의 딜레마와 이분법의 이데올로기
The Dilemmas of Literary Translation and Ideological Dichotomies
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The method of translation does not guarantee a plurality of possibilities. Both in East and West, the ways of translating are being discussed within the framework of dichotomy. The dichotomy between those who argue that you should translate the letter just as it is, and those who claim you should make the author’s message easy to read, has haunted every major moment of translation’s history, and it kept giving rise to controversies. Literary text is what makes most obvious the inability of these two aspects held as representative translation methods because a translation can only succeed through the process of translating the literary elements of a literary text, in other words, what turns a text into “literature.” Special configuration of sentences, a style that reflects the artist’s personality, and the use of specialized vocabulary, all these factors we often refer to as “literarity” (Jakobson) are the core upon which translators need to stay focused in their work of translating. What needs to be translated is the unique path the text draws, which corresponds to “the maximum value of subjectivity”(Meschonnic) in the text. The task of the translator is precisely the process of transforming this unique organization of the text into other languages, and to capture what occurs throughout this process. The uniqueness of literary translation is to make the reader feel he is reading a translated text through the translation of the author’s unique style. Literary translation is bound to cooperate with the process of criticism that assesses the particularities of the text. Literary criticism and literary translation work together inextricably.
Abstract
The method of translation does not guarantee a plurality of possibilities. Both in East and West, the ways of translating are being discussed within the framework of dichotomy. The dichotomy between those who argue that you should translate the letter just as it is, and those who claim you should make the author’s message easy to read, has haunted every major moment of translation’s history, and it kept giving rise to controversies. Literary text is what makes most obvious the inability of these two aspects held as representative translation methods because a translation can only succeed through the process of translating the literary elements of a literary text, in other words, what turns a text into “literature.” Special configuration of sentences, a style that reflects the artist’s personality, and the use of specialized vocabulary, all these factors we often refer to as “literarity” (Jakobson) are the core upon which translators need to stay focused in their work of translating. What needs to be translated is the unique path the text draws, which corresponds to “the maximum value of subjectivity”(Meschonnic) in the text. The task of the translator is precisely the process of transforming this unique organization of the text into other languages, and to capture what occurs throughout this process. The uniqueness of literary translation is to make the reader feel he is reading a translated text through the translation of the author’s unique style. Literary translation is bound to cooperate with the process of criticism that assesses the particularities of the text. Literary criticism and literary translation work together inextricably.
참고문헌 (31)
- Badiou, Alain, "On Beckett" (2013), Minumsa
- Beckett, Samuel, "En attendant Godot" (1952), Minuit
- Beckett, Samuel., "Waiting for Godot" (1956), Faber
- Beckett, Samuel, "Waiting for Godot" (1969), Dongseo Munhwawon
- Beckett, Samuel, "Waiting for Godot" (1972), Daehan
- Beckett, Samuel, "Print" (1991), Yeni
- Beckett, Samuel, "Waiting for Godot" (1999), Chongmok
- Beckett, Samuel, "Waiting for Godot" (2000), Minumsa
- Beckett, Samuel, "Waiting for Godot" (2006), Haseo
- Benjamin, Walter, "Translator’s Task", Translation Criticism, 1(1), pp.186~198 (2007)
- Berman, Antoine, "Pour une critique des traductions: John Donne" (1995), Gallimard
- Berman, Antoine, "La traduction et la lettre ou l’auberge du lointain" (1999), Seuil
- Brocher, Jean-Jacques, "Dictionnaire universel des littératures" (1994), PUF
- Cambon, Pierre, "Préface. La surproductivité" (1992), Actes Sud
- 조재룡, "‘번역문학’의 정치성에 관한 고찰 - 직역과 의역의 이분법을 넘어서", 비교한국학 Comparative Korean Studies, 17(1), pp.109~143 (2009), 국제비교한국학회
- Cho, Jae-Ryong, "The Rhythm of Translated Poems", pp.27~65 (2012), Somyong
- Cho, Jae-Ryong, "The Spectre of Translation", pp.171~207 (2011), Munji
- Cho, Se-Hui, "The Dwarf" (2006), U of Hawaii P
- Cho, Sehui, "Le Nain" (1995), Actes Sud
- Cho, Se-Hui, "A Small Ball A Dwarf Shot Up" (1997), Moonji
- Deleuze, Giles, "Epuisé" (1992), Les Editions du Minuit
- Freud, Sigmund, "Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious" (1997), Openbooks
- 황현산, "번역과 시 - 외국시의 모국어 체험", 불어불문학연구, (82), pp.285~314 (2010), 한국불어불문학회
- Kim, Byeong-Ik, "A Small Ball A Dwarf Shot Up" (1997), Moonji
- Kim, Seung-ok, "Prolificacy" (2004), Munhakdongne
- Kim, Sung’ok, "La surproductivité" (1992), Actes Sud
- Ladmiral, Jean-René, "Sourciers et ciblistes", Revue d’Esthétique, 12, pp.95~104 (1986)
- Meschonnic, Henri, "Poétique du traduire" (1999), Verdier
- Meschonnic, Henri, "Pour la poétique II, Epistémologie de l’écriture, Poétique de la traduction" (1973), Gallimard
- Ranciere, Jacques, "The Ignorant Schoolmaster" (2008), Kungree
- Steiner, George, "Après Babel, Une poétique du dire et de la traduction" (1978), Albin Michel