기호학 비평과 마르크스주의 비평의 종합과 그 너머
Beyond the Synthesis of Semiotics and Marxist Criticism
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Two roads to genuine criticism in the study of art and literature runs parallel. Kantian aesthetician says that art, transcendent from all interests, is beautiful as art itself. Hegellian aesthetician regards art as way to telos. Semiotic criticism analysed the internal structure and forming principles of text. Marxist criticism synthesized literary works as super-structure and socioeconomic base. Marxist criticism subordinated literature to socioeconomic content and deprived literary text of literariness while evading the problem of poetic construction. Formalism was not able to admit that an external social factor could become an intrinsic factor of literature. Bakhtin's sociological poetics went far beyond the non-social poetics of pure Formalism as well as the non-literary sociology of crude Marxism contributing both a genetic structuralist approach. Bakhtin defined the task of sociological poetics as grasping the concrete and material unity of poetic construction both in relation to its semantic meaning and ideological significance. However, we realize limitation to apply this theory to poetic text and draw meanings and aesthetic value. Social semiotics synthesize text and ideology, structure and history. It criticize the ideology in discourse. However, it is very difficult to find literariness in literary text while applying to this theory. Because, I look at the two ways beyond sociological poetics and Social semiotics. The one is the synthesis of semiotics and cultural studies. The other is Hwajaeng Semiology. Hwajaeng semiology is my original theory which synthesize ss and cultural studiesociology. This theory synthesize text and context, text and ideology, code and message, author as a ssnder and reader as a recedies through Wonhyo(元曉: 617-686)'s Hwajaeng philosophy. It i686ossible to colligate formalism poetics and l studiesociologyeso that we may poeticpoey and sciencioicpoey analyze the structure s th text while at the same time interpret and evaluates the value of the text in its sociocultural context.
Abstract
Two roads to genuine criticism in the study of art and literature runs parallel. Kantian aesthetician says that art, transcendent from all interests, is beautiful as art itself. Hegellian aesthetician regards art as way to telos. Semiotic criticism analysed the internal structure and forming principles of text. Marxist criticism synthesized literary works as super-structure and socioeconomic base. Marxist criticism subordinated literature to socioeconomic content and deprived literary text of literariness while evading the problem of poetic construction. Formalism was not able to admit that an external social factor could become an intrinsic factor of literature. Bakhtin's sociological poetics went far beyond the non-social poetics of pure Formalism as well as the non-literary sociology of crude Marxism contributing both a genetic structuralist approach. Bakhtin defined the task of sociological poetics as grasping the concrete and material unity of poetic construction both in relation to its semantic meaning and ideological significance. However, we realize limitation to apply this theory to poetic text and draw meanings and aesthetic value. Social semiotics synthesize text and ideology, structure and history. It criticize the ideology in discourse. However, it is very difficult to find literariness in literary text while applying to this theory. Because, I look at the two ways beyond sociological poetics and Social semiotics. The one is the synthesis of semiotics and cultural studies. The other is Hwajaeng Semiology. Hwajaeng semiology is my original theory which synthesize ss and cultural studiesociology. This theory synthesize text and context, text and ideology, code and message, author as a ssnder and reader as a recedies through Wonhyo(元曉: 617-686)'s Hwajaeng philosophy. It i686ossible to colligate formalism poetics and l studiesociologyeso that we may poeticpoey and sciencioicpoey analyze the structure s th text while at the same time interpret and evaluates the value of the text in its sociocultural context.
참고문헌 (32)
- 김지원, "한국춤의 코드와 해석" (2006), 한양대학교출판부
- 이도흠, "元曉의 和諍의 틀에서 본 문학텍스트에서 現實의 反映과 屈折의 문제", 韓國學論集, 31, pp.69~98 (1997), 한양대 한국학연구소
- 이도흠, "18-19세기의 朝鮮朝 詩歌의 變貌樣相과 近代性 問題", 한국학논집, (43), pp.83~125 (2008), 한국학연구소
- 이도흠, "18∼19세기 가사에서 상품화폐경제에 대한 태도 유형 분석", 고전문학연구, (34), pp.61~106 (2008), 한국고전문학회
- 이도흠, "18∼19세기의 시조에 나타난 사랑의 태도 유형 분석", 한국문학이론과 비평, 12(4), pp.7~40 (2008), 한국문학이론과비평학회
- 이도흠, "화쟁기호학,이론과 실제" (1999), 한양대출판부
- 이찬주, "범부춤의 심층구조와 의미에 대한 화쟁기호학적 연구", 박사, pp.2005
- 조지형, "포스트모던 시대의 기호학적 역사학-화쟁기호학을 중심으로", 歷史學報, 165, pp.143~175 (2000)
- 게오르그 루카치, "소설의 이론" (1985), 심설당
- 스테판 코올, "리얼리즘의 歷史와 理論" (1982), 한밭
- 움베르토 에코, "기호와 현대예술" (1998), 열린책들
- 움베르토 에코, "기호학이론" (1985), 문학과 지성사
- 칼 마르크스, "정치경제학 비판 서문", pp.382~383 (1989), 백의
- 칼 마르크스, "독일이데올로기Ⅰ", pp.59~ (1989), 두레
- 테리 이글턴, "문학사회학:두 접근법", pp.601~ (1995), 한신문화사
- 테리 이글턴, "문학이론입문", pp.141~ (1988), 창비사
- 프레드릭 제임슨, "언어의 감옥" (1990), 까치
- Adorno, T. W., "Aesthetic Theory" (1984), Routeledge & Kegan Paul
- Bakhtin M.M., "The Formal Method in Literary Scholarship - A Critical Introduction to Sociological Poetics" (1985), Havard Univ. Press
- Bakhtin, M. M., "The Problem of Speech Genre in: Speech Genres and Other Late Essays" (1986), University of Texas Press
- Bakhtin, M. M., "The Problem of the Text in Linguistics, Philology, and the Human Sciences: an Experiment in Philosophical Analysis in: Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist, Speech Genres and Other Late Essays" (1986), University of Texas Press
- Brecht, Bertolt, "Against Georg Lukács in: Aesthetics and Politics" (1986), Verso
- Hodge, Robert, "Social Semiotics" (1988), Polity Press
- Jackson, Rosemary, "Fantasy: The Literature of Subversion" (1981), Methuen
- Lotman, Jurij M., "The Analysis of Poetic Text" (1972), Univ. of Michigan
- Lukacs, Georg, "Realism in our time-Literature and Class Struggle" (1971), Harper & Row Pub.
- Peirce, Charles Sanders, "Collected Paper" (1982), Harvard University Press
- Plekhanov, G., "Art and Society & Other Papers in Historical Materialism" (1974), Sentry Press
- Saussure, Ferdinand de, "Course in General Linguistics" (1959), Philosophical Library
- Sontag, Susan, "A Barthe Reader" (1982), Hill and Wang
- Volosinov, V. N., "Marxism and the Philosophy of Language" (1973), Seminar Press
- Zuidervaart, Lambert, "The Social Significance of Autonomous Art: Adorno and Büger", The Journal of Aesthetic and Art Criticism, 48(1), pp.61~77 (1990)