1910년대 소설과 자기 정립의 서사
1910s novel and the Narration of Self thesis
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article deals with 1910s novel by looking at the current living environment’s accommodation aspect, the principle of constituent family, and the process of inner development It analyzes how these characteristics gets exposed to assume self thesis. For example, BiPahSeong engages the process of using convenience of a current civilization and the process of getting a job at a company as a fully grown adult. From this processes, protagonists restore family-oriented patriarchy and establish one self as subject of traditional ethic. Although they survive through hardships in order to keep the marriage engagement, this is just a link in a chain of desire to succeed the family. Family becomes existential on public space and it is very far from the desire to expand the family romance. GeumGookHwa(gold-chrysanthemum) is similar with BiPahSeong as traditional ethic plays an important role in the narration of family restoration, but common idea of obedience from the novel is specifically based on 1910s Joseon, temporally and spatially. As the protagonists yearn to achieve family romance, the parent generation’s sin is internalized within the child generation’s pain. Although new inner self is developed through it, one becomes an adapt subject due to the superego of traditional ethic called obedience. Therefore the family romance which protagonists form, summons ‘obedience’ as an imaginative community and restructure a family system and role. On the other hand, Moo-Jeong(Heartless) clearly divides the traditional generation through orphan’s consciousness. This novel’s inner self-reflection becomes an important axis of narration. Thesis is not about following external ethics code, but rather about creating value through ration and emotion. The protagonist’s inner self is full of accumulated ‘Bildung’(Culture) and desire to complete one’s individuality. But completion of ‘Bildung’ repeatedly gets pushed back, and subject experiences embarrassment due to deficiency. This can evolve as an opportunity to recognize empire’s authority. Also, orphan‘s consciousness, society without adults, becomes a source that designate a youth as nation’s core, and their desired family romance is connected with imaginative community called nation to create nation-wide commonness.
Abstract
This article deals with 1910s novel by looking at the current living environment’s accommodation aspect, the principle of constituent family, and the process of inner development It analyzes how these characteristics gets exposed to assume self thesis. For example, BiPahSeong engages the process of using convenience of a current civilization and the process of getting a job at a company as a fully grown adult. From this processes, protagonists restore family-oriented patriarchy and establish one self as subject of traditional ethic. Although they survive through hardships in order to keep the marriage engagement, this is just a link in a chain of desire to succeed the family. Family becomes existential on public space and it is very far from the desire to expand the family romance. GeumGookHwa(gold-chrysanthemum) is similar with BiPahSeong as traditional ethic plays an important role in the narration of family restoration, but common idea of obedience from the novel is specifically based on 1910s Joseon, temporally and spatially. As the protagonists yearn to achieve family romance, the parent generation’s sin is internalized within the child generation’s pain. Although new inner self is developed through it, one becomes an adapt subject due to the superego of traditional ethic called obedience. Therefore the family romance which protagonists form, summons ‘obedience’ as an imaginative community and restructure a family system and role. On the other hand, Moo-Jeong(Heartless) clearly divides the traditional generation through orphan’s consciousness. This novel’s inner self-reflection becomes an important axis of narration. Thesis is not about following external ethics code, but rather about creating value through ration and emotion. The protagonist’s inner self is full of accumulated ‘Bildung’(Culture) and desire to complete one’s individuality. But completion of ‘Bildung’ repeatedly gets pushed back, and subject experiences embarrassment due to deficiency. This can evolve as an opportunity to recognize empire’s authority. Also, orphan‘s consciousness, society without adults, becomes a source that designate a youth as nation’s core, and their desired family romance is connected with imaginative community called nation to create nation-wide commonness.
참고문헌 (26)
- 이해조, "비파성" (1914), 신구서점
- 김용준, "금국화 상" (1913), 보급서관
- 김용준, "금국화 하" (1914), 보급서관
- 이광수, "무정(6판)" (1926), 홍문당서점
- 권보드래, "죄, 눈물, 회개", 한국근대문학연구, (16), pp.7~41 (2007), 한국근대문학회
- 김동식, "한국의 근대적 문학 개념 형성과정 연구", 박사, pp.1999
- 김복순, "1910년대 한국문학과 근대성" (1999), 소명출판사
- 김석봉, "신소설의 대중적 성격 연구", 박사, pp.2003
- 김영민, "한국근대소설사" (1997), 솔출판사
- 김지영, "신소설에 나타난 ‘문명’의 표상-개념과 스토리의 연관관계를 중심으로-", 어문논집, 59(59), pp.333~375 (2009), 민족어문학회
- 김현주, "구활자본 소설에 나타난 ‘가정담론’의 대중미학적 원리", 반교어문연구, (27), pp.247~280 (2009), 반교어문학회
- 이재선, "한국개화기소설연구" (1972), 일조각
- 한기형, "한국 근대소설사의 시각" (1999), 소명출판
- 한승옥, "이광수 소설에 나타난 희생양 모티프", 한국문학이론과 비평, 9(1), pp.13~32 (2005), 한국문학이론과비평학회
- 한형구, "한국 근대 문학과 ‘민족’(民族)이라는 상상 공동체-민족주의적 정열, 혹은 한국 근대문학 형성의 주동력", 한국근대문학연구, 12(12), pp.202~236 (2005), 한국근대문학회
- 허만욱, "1910년대 도시성 소설 연구- 근대성 문화기제를 중심으로", 새국어교육, (73), pp.405~430 (2006), 한국국어교육학회
- 허병식, "문화의 이념과 부르조아적 주체의 기획-『무정』과 교양의 변증법 -", 한국문예비평연구, 23(23), pp.337~360 (2007), 한국현대문예비평학회
- 홍혜원, "이광수 소설에 나타난 여성상과 근대성", 현대소설연구, 16(16), pp.115~134 (2002), 한국현대소설학회
- 황종연, "노블, 청년, 제국", 상허학보, 14, pp.263~297 (2005), 상허학회
- 폴 리쾨르, "시간과이야기1", pp.104~ (1999), 문학과지성사
- 해리 하르투니언, "역사의 요동", pp.229~ (2006), 휴머니스트
- 上野千鶴子, "近代家族の成立と終焉" (1994), 岩波書店
- 靑木 保, "知識人" (1999), 岩波書店
- 成田龍一, "近代知の成立知識人" (2002), 岩波書店
- 竹內 洋, "敎養主義の沒落" (2003), 中央公論新社
- 竹內 洋, "立身出世主義" (2005), 世界思想社
