일부 건강도시 특성에 따른 건강도시 구조와 과정의 비교
Comparison of the structure and the process of Healthy Cities by some characteristics of Healthy City
1
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: The purpose of the study was to compare healthy cities focusing on their structure and process by three characteristics of Healthy City: urban/rural, the tenure of healthy city program, and the location of healthy city team. Methods: A self-administered survey was conducted between November 18 through December 12, 2016. Fifty eight out of 83 healthy cities participated in the survey. The indicators in each of the structure and the process domains were standardized and summed to produce the domain scores. Two sampled t-test was used to compare the structure score and the process score by the three regional variables. Results: Rural areas had lower structure scores than urban areas. Nither the structure scores nor the process scores were not different between those cities that began healthy city program before 2011 and those that began in 2011 or after. Both structure and process scores were higher where healthy city team was located outside of public health center than where healthy city team was in the public health center. Conclusions: Tailored supports are needed for rural areas and those cities where the healthy city team is located in their public health center. Capacity building programs are generally needed including the starting group of healthy cities.
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of the study was to compare healthy cities focusing on their structure and process by three characteristics of Healthy City: urban/rural, the tenure of healthy city program, and the location of healthy city team. Methods: A self-administered survey was conducted between November 18 through December 12, 2016. Fifty eight out of 83 healthy cities participated in the survey. The indicators in each of the structure and the process domains were standardized and summed to produce the domain scores. Two sampled t-test was used to compare the structure score and the process score by the three regional variables. Results: Rural areas had lower structure scores than urban areas. Nither the structure scores nor the process scores were not different between those cities that began healthy city program before 2011 and those that began in 2011 or after. Both structure and process scores were higher where healthy city team was located outside of public health center than where healthy city team was in the public health center. Conclusions: Tailored supports are needed for rural areas and those cities where the healthy city team is located in their public health center. Capacity building programs are generally needed including the starting group of healthy cities.
참고문헌 (16)
- Awofeso, N., "What’s new about the"New Public Health"?", American Journal of Public Health, 94, pp.705~709 (2004)
- de Leeuw, E., "European Healthy Cities evaluation: conceptual framework and methodology", Health Promotion International, 30(Suppl_1), pp.i8~i17 (2015)
- de Leeuw, E., "Healthy Cities: The theory, policy, and practice of value-based urban planning" (2017), Springer
- de Leeuw, E., "Evidence for Healthy Cities: reflections on practice, method and theory", Health Promotion International, 24(Suppl 1), pp.i19~i36 (2009)
- de Leeuw, E., "Global and local(glocal)health : the WHO healthy cities programme", Global Change and Human Health, 2(1), pp.34~45 (2001)
- Donabedian, A., "Evaluating the quality of medical care", Milbank Quarterly, 83(4), pp.691~729 (2005)
- Promoting health in the urban context, "Hancock, T.", WHO, ~, pp.WHO Healthy Cities Papers, 1 (1998)
- Kang, E., "Intersectoral collaboration for physical activity in Korean Healthy Cities", Health Promotion International, 31(3), pp.551~561 (2016)
- 강혜정, "소득분위별 도농간 소득격차의 원인 분석", 농업경제연구, 50(4), pp.67~86 (2009), 한국농업경제학회
- Kang, E., "Development of Korean Healthy City Index" (2016), Soonchunhyang University & Korea Healthy Cities Partnership
- 김진희, "새로운 건강정책 패러다임으로서의 건강도시 접근법", 대한의사협회지, 54(8), pp.884~891 (2011), 대한의사협회
- 김하윤, "건강도시에 대한 국내 연구동향 분석(1990-2014)", 보건행정학회지, 25(4), pp.264~276 (2015), 한국보건행정학회
- "Population by age and sex-Eup, Myeon, Dong" (2017)[URL]
- 남은우, "Evaluation of Healthy City Project Using SPIRIT Checklist: Wonju City Case", 보건교육건강증진학회지, 27(5), pp.15~25 (2010), 한국보건교육건강증진학회
- 오유미, "한국의 건강도시 현황 및 평가 : 제 4기 유럽 건강도시 평과결과를 중심으로", 대한보건연구, 37(2), pp.75~85 (2011), 사단법인 대한보건협회
- WHO, "Monitoring, Accountability, Reporting, and Impact Assessment, MARI: A Framework for Phase III Healthy Cities", Prepared for Healthy Cities Business Meeting (1999), World Health Organization European Office