범죄수사에 있어서 잠입수사관제도의 도입여부 -독일의 잠입수사관 투입제도를 중심으로-
Introduction of Undercover Employees in Crime Investigation - Focused on Undercover Employees in Germany -
0
조회
0
다운로드
16
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Recently, the Organized Crime has a tendence in increasing and its method of crime is diverse and intelligent by means of lawful business and company, disguising the lawful, including unlawful method. Because of the circumstances above-mentioned, it needs to introduce restrictively the system of Undercover Employees as a means of investigation, to protect and repress effectively the organized crimes. The Undercover Investigations have some merits which can allow to know the whole things, only a member of organized crime can know, and which can protect and treat effectively the crimes and by means of collecting the all information about the crime in effectiveness of crime investigation. Though Undercover Investigation is an effective investigation method in investigating the organized crimes, there must be some worries of its abuses, because Undercover Investigation is executed by the Government and does not have any regulation and rule. Ordinarily, general investigation is open and has a characteristic of posterior measure. On the other hand, Undercover Investigation is disguised, fraud and used by the attraction method and has a characteristic of proactive and confidential measure. Because of the confidential method of Undercover Investigation, it is not easy to collect the information about Undercover Employees. So, it is compulsory that Undercover Employees should be run by the Court's Admission or Warrant of Undercover Investigation, because there must be the violations of Human Rights. In some needs of protection of undercover employees, we can have some problems in Prosecution Process. It is not possible to take the undercover employees as a witness and it can crashed by the party's interrogation of witness. And there can be more problems like qualification of evidence, crimes of Undercover Employees and so on. It should be prudent to introduce and adopt the Undercover Investigation or Undercover Employees, because there are some problems that the essence of Undercover Investigation can not divided crime world and non-crime world, and crime investigation's superiority to ethics, destruction of citizen reliability. In some reasons above-mentioned, Undercover Employees should be introduced restrictedly by the consideration of benefits of investigation and guarantee of civil rights, benefits of governments by means of comparative weight.
Abstract
Recently, the Organized Crime has a tendence in increasing and its method of crime is diverse and intelligent by means of lawful business and company, disguising the lawful, including unlawful method. Because of the circumstances above-mentioned, it needs to introduce restrictively the system of Undercover Employees as a means of investigation, to protect and repress effectively the organized crimes. The Undercover Investigations have some merits which can allow to know the whole things, only a member of organized crime can know, and which can protect and treat effectively the crimes and by means of collecting the all information about the crime in effectiveness of crime investigation. Though Undercover Investigation is an effective investigation method in investigating the organized crimes, there must be some worries of its abuses, because Undercover Investigation is executed by the Government and does not have any regulation and rule. Ordinarily, general investigation is open and has a characteristic of posterior measure. On the other hand, Undercover Investigation is disguised, fraud and used by the attraction method and has a characteristic of proactive and confidential measure. Because of the confidential method of Undercover Investigation, it is not easy to collect the information about Undercover Employees. So, it is compulsory that Undercover Employees should be run by the Court's Admission or Warrant of Undercover Investigation, because there must be the violations of Human Rights. In some needs of protection of undercover employees, we can have some problems in Prosecution Process. It is not possible to take the undercover employees as a witness and it can crashed by the party's interrogation of witness. And there can be more problems like qualification of evidence, crimes of Undercover Employees and so on. It should be prudent to introduce and adopt the Undercover Investigation or Undercover Employees, because there are some problems that the essence of Undercover Investigation can not divided crime world and non-crime world, and crime investigation's superiority to ethics, destruction of citizen reliability. In some reasons above-mentioned, Undercover Employees should be introduced restrictedly by the consideration of benefits of investigation and guarantee of civil rights, benefits of governments by means of comparative weight.
참고문헌 (35)
- 관세청, "국제범죄와 특수조사실무", ~ (2003)
- 김민철, "경찰학개론" (2012), 웅진패스원
- 김성룡, "신분위장수사경찰？비밀정보원활용과 그 형사법적문제점에 관한 독일의 논의 현황", 비교형사법연구, 7(2(2))통권 : 13, pp.247~270 (2005), 한국비교형사법학회
- 조직범죄의 유형변화와 대처방안, "도중진", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2004)
- 류전철, "조직범죄수사기법의 형사법적 문제", 비교형사법연구, 3(1) (2001), 한국비교형사법학회
- 서상희, "독일의 신분위장수사경찰제도에 관한 고찰", 2012 국외훈련검사 연구논문집, 27 (2013), 법무연수원
- 손동권, "組織犯罪에 대한 現行 立法對策과 改善方向", 비교형사법연구, 5(2-1), pp.21~542 (2003), 한국비교형사법학회
- 오병두, "경찰정보활동에 대한 검토", 경찰개혁연속 정책토론회 제5차 자료집 (2007), 인권연대
- 임웅외, "조직범죄와 형사법" (2004), 법문사
- 장영민, "조직범죄수사의 문제점과 개선방안", 형사정책연구, 5(2) (1994), 한국형사정책학회
- 정원, "연속 정책토론회 제1차 자료집", 토론문, 인권연대, ~ (2010)
- 조국, "함정수사의 위법성기준과 법적 효과에 대한 재검토", 형사법연구, (14) (2000), 한국형사법학회
- Christoph Gusy, "Polizeirecht, 4.Aufl", ~ (2000)
- Gary T. Marx, "Police ; Undercover Tactics", Eincycoopedia of Crime and Justice, 3 (2002)
- Claus Roxin, "Strafverfahrensrecht, 25.Aufl.", ~ (1998)
- Hassemer, "Stellungnahme zum Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Bekämpfung des illegalen Rauschgift und anderer Erschrinungsformen der Organisierten Kriminalität(OrgKG)", KJ, ~ (1992)
- Hilgendorf-Schmidt, "Über den Referentenentwurf des Gesetzes zur Änderung und Ergänzung des Strafverfahrensrechts", wistra, ~ (1989)
- Hilger, "Neues Strafverfahrensrecht durch das OrgKG", NStZ, ~ (1992)
- Kraus, "Sicherheitsstaat und Strafverteidigung", StV, ~ (1989)
- Lagodny, "Verdeckte Ermittler und V-Leute im Spiegel von §136a StPO als angewandtes Verfassungsrecht", StV, ~ (1996)
- Lammer, "Verdeckte Ermittlung im Strafprozeß", ~ (1992)
- Lesch, "Soll die Begehung 'milieutypischer' Straftaten durch verdeckte Ermittler erlaubt werden?" (1993), Strafverteidiger
- Lisken, "Über Aufgabe und Befugnisse der Polizei im Staats des Grundgesetzes", ZRP, ~ (1990)
- Makrutzki, "Verdeckte Ermittler im Strafprozeß", ~ (2000)
- Merten, "Volkszählungsurteil des BverfG und Eingriffsbefugnis", DÖV, ~ (1985)
- Möhrenschlager, "Das OrgKG-eine Übersicht nach amtlichen Materialien", wistra, ~ (1992)
- Rogall, "Strafprozessale Grundlagen und legislative Probleme des Einsatzes Verdeckter Ermittler im Strafverfahren", JZ, ~ (1987)
- Schmitz, "Rechtliche Probleme des Einsatzes Verdeckter Ermittler", ~ (1996)
- Stetten, "Beweisverwertung beim Einsatz Verdeckter Ermittler", ~ (1999)
- Strate, "Stellungnahme des Strafrechtsausschlusses des Deutschen Anwaltsvereins", StV, ~ (1992)
- Weßlau, "Vorfeldermittlungen", ~ (1989)
- Weigend, "ドイツの刑事手續における隱密搜査官と情報提供者", 刑 法雜誌, 36(2) (1996), 日本刑法學會
- 廣中俊雄, "警備公安警察の硏究, In 警備警察全書" (1973), 岩波書店
- 島田茂, "ドイツにおける豫防警察的情報收集活動と侵害留保論, In 各國警察制度の再編" (1995), 法政大學出版局
- 淺田和茂, "科學搜査と刑事鑑定" (1994), 有斐閣