함정수사의 형사법적 제문제
Problems of the undercover investigation in a substantial and legal procedure law
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The undercover investigation is one method that is used to investigate criminals like organized criminal and narcotic criminals that have difficulties in bust or catching suspicion by a investigative agency. This article defines the undercover investigation as a investigative method that is a investigative agency's evil trick or strategy to abet or incite citizens commit criminals and then gather evidences or bust. And also, with deciding the standard of the undercover investigation, this article agree with the synthesize theory that consider synthetically the inner intent of counter-lured person, kinds and characteristics of criminals, details and methods of lure, position and role of a luring person, and illegality of a luring actions itself. In synthesize theory of the undercover investigation view, if it is decided illegal, next when it is prosecuted a case, there are problems that related to decision of a court and criminal liability of a investigative agency. This article examines and divides this into legal procedure law issue and substantial law. The court can decide a punishment to a counter-lured person. The illegality of undercover investigation can't function as a formal trial cause, merely can be understood in terms of a consideration fact in truth court hearing as a problem of admissibility of evidence. The investigative agency that use the illegal undercover investigation method has a problem of attempted abetment, but the attempted abetment requires double feasance, so the investigative agency without feasance of the chief criminal can't be concluded as an abetter. However, the body of the book examines that it can be concluded as a abuse one's authority in Criminal law particulars. The investigation, whether it is a random or compulsory investigation, can infringe on investigative subject's rights. So the legal procedure law restrict through necessity and reciprocality of the investigation, but the undercover investigation have a possibility that may cross the limit line. Especially in case that some criminals are prevalent and necessity of the investigation increases, investigative agency can be easily lured by the undercover investigation. The investigative agency must be careful not to break the essential limit of investigation because of the realistic difficulties of investigation.
Abstract
The undercover investigation is one method that is used to investigate criminals like organized criminal and narcotic criminals that have difficulties in bust or catching suspicion by a investigative agency. This article defines the undercover investigation as a investigative method that is a investigative agency's evil trick or strategy to abet or incite citizens commit criminals and then gather evidences or bust. And also, with deciding the standard of the undercover investigation, this article agree with the synthesize theory that consider synthetically the inner intent of counter-lured person, kinds and characteristics of criminals, details and methods of lure, position and role of a luring person, and illegality of a luring actions itself. In synthesize theory of the undercover investigation view, if it is decided illegal, next when it is prosecuted a case, there are problems that related to decision of a court and criminal liability of a investigative agency. This article examines and divides this into legal procedure law issue and substantial law. The court can decide a punishment to a counter-lured person. The illegality of undercover investigation can't function as a formal trial cause, merely can be understood in terms of a consideration fact in truth court hearing as a problem of admissibility of evidence. The investigative agency that use the illegal undercover investigation method has a problem of attempted abetment, but the attempted abetment requires double feasance, so the investigative agency without feasance of the chief criminal can't be concluded as an abetter. However, the body of the book examines that it can be concluded as a abuse one's authority in Criminal law particulars. The investigation, whether it is a random or compulsory investigation, can infringe on investigative subject's rights. So the legal procedure law restrict through necessity and reciprocality of the investigation, but the undercover investigation have a possibility that may cross the limit line. Especially in case that some criminals are prevalent and necessity of the investigation increases, investigative agency can be easily lured by the undercover investigation. The investigative agency must be careful not to break the essential limit of investigation because of the realistic difficulties of investigation.
참고문헌 (51)
- 이재상, "신형사소송법", pp.188~ (2010), 박영사
- 배종대, "신형사소송법", pp.87~88 (2009), 홍문사
- 이은모, "형사소송법", pp.167~ (2011), 박영사
- LaFave, Wayne R, "Criminal procedure 4th ed", pp.302~ (2004), St. Paul, Minn
- 정신교, "함정수사의 합리적 통제방안", 법학연구, (42), pp.249~270 (2011), 한국법학회
- 정진연, "함정수사의 위법판단기준과 법적 효과", 비교형사법연구, 7(2(2)), pp.53~74 (2005), 한국비교형사법학회
- 권오걸, "형사소송법-이론.판례-", pp.198~ (2010), 형설출판사
- 신동운, "신형사소송법 제2판", pp.120~ (2009), 법문사
- 유인창, "함정수사의 법적 효력에 관한 연구", 법학연구, (20), pp.525~542 (2005), 한국법학회
- 임동규, , pp.124~ (2009), 법문사
- 조국, "함정수사의 위법성 기준과 법적 효 과에 대한 재검토", 형사법연구, 14, pp.82~ (2000), 한국형사법학회
- 강구진, "형사소송법원론", pp.179~ (1982), 학연사
- 백형구, "형 사소송법강의", pp.365~ (2000), 박영사
- 송광섭, "형사소송법", pp.197~ (2003), 유스티니아누스
- 정웅석, , pp.420~ (2008), 대명출판사
- 진계호, , pp.199~ (2004), 형설출판사
- 차용석, , pp.169~ (2008), 21세기사
- 이만종, "경찰 함정수사의 형사법적 고찰", 한국경찰연구, 6(2), pp.139~166 (2007), 한국경찰연구학회
- 박광민, "함정수사의 규제", 성균관법학, (7), pp.48~ (1996), 성균관대학교 법학연구소
- 신동운, , pp.66~ (2007), 법문사
- 신양균, "형사소송법", pp.74~ (2000), 법문사
- 최영홍, "함정수사와 법원의 대응", 판례월보, (211), pp.14~ (1988)
- 김기두, "함정수사", pp.106~ (1983), 법문사
- 김진환, "함정수사에 의하여 수집한 증거", 고시계, (391) (1989), 국가고시학회
- 김성천, "형법", pp.386~ (2009), 도서출판 소진
- 서보학, "형법총론", pp.633~ (2006), 박영사
- 박상기, "형법총론(제8판)", pp.375~ (2009), 박영사
- 배종대, , pp.555~ (2008), 홍문사
- 성낙현, "형법총론", pp.628~ (2010), 동방문화사
- 손동권, , pp.525~ (2005), 율곡출판사
- 이재상, , pp.432~ (2010), 박영사
- 임웅, , pp.460~ (2011), 법문사
- 정성근, , pp.505~ (2011), 삼영사
- 정영일, "형법총론", pp.391~ (2010), 박영사
- 진계호, , pp.548~ (2007), 대왕출판사
- 권문택, "미수의 교사", 고시계, 259, pp.27~ (1978), 한국고시학회
- 김성돈, , pp.640~ (2009), 성균관대학교 출판부
- 신동운, , pp.620~ (2010), 법문사
- 오영근, "형법총론", pp.602~ (2009), 박영사
- 김종원, "교사범", 고시계, (218), pp.39~ (1975), 한국고시학회
- 이한교, "미수의 교사", 고시계, (394), pp.35~ (1989), 한국고시학회
- 이재상, , pp.705~ (2007), 박영사
- 김일수, "(새로쓴)형법각론", pp.815~ (2009), 박영사
- 배종대, "(제7전정판)", pp.818~ (2010), 홍문사
- 오영근, "형법각론", pp.896~ (2010), 박영사
- 이재상, "(보정신판)", pp.705~
- 이형국, "형법각론", pp.765~ (2007), 법문사
- 임웅, , pp.841~
- 정성근, ",", pp.792~ (2008), 삼지원
- 정영일, , pp.740~ (2008), 박영사
- 진계호, , pp.821~ (2008), 대왕출판사
