Accuracy of a proposed implant impression technique using abutments and metal framework
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. This study compared the accuracy of an abutment-framework (A-F) taken with open tray impression technique combining cementon crown abutments, a metal framework and resin cement to closed tray and resin-splinted open tray impression techniques for the 3-implant definitive casts. The effect of angulation on the accuracy of these 3 techniques was also evaluated. MATERIAL AND METHODS. Three definitive casts, each with 3 linearly positioned implant analogs at relative angulations 0, 30, and 40 degrees, were fabricated with passively fitted corresponding reference frameworks. Ten impressions were made and poured, using each of the 3 techniques on each of the 3 definitive casts. To record the vertical gap between reference frameworks and analogs in duplicate casts, a light microscope with image processing was used. Data were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test. RESULTS. The open tray techniques showed significantly smaller vertical gaps compare to closed tray technique (P < .05). The closed tray and the resin-splinted open tray technique showed significantly different vertical gaps according to the angulation of implant (P < .05), but the A-F impression technique did not (P > .05). CONCLUSION. The accuracy of the A-F impression technique was superior to that of conventional techniques, and was not affected by the angulation of the implants.
Abstract
PURPOSE. This study compared the accuracy of an abutment-framework (A-F) taken with open tray impression technique combining cementon crown abutments, a metal framework and resin cement to closed tray and resin-splinted open tray impression techniques for the 3-implant definitive casts. The effect of angulation on the accuracy of these 3 techniques was also evaluated. MATERIAL AND METHODS. Three definitive casts, each with 3 linearly positioned implant analogs at relative angulations 0, 30, and 40 degrees, were fabricated with passively fitted corresponding reference frameworks. Ten impressions were made and poured, using each of the 3 techniques on each of the 3 definitive casts. To record the vertical gap between reference frameworks and analogs in duplicate casts, a light microscope with image processing was used. Data were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test. RESULTS. The open tray techniques showed significantly smaller vertical gaps compare to closed tray technique (P < .05). The closed tray and the resin-splinted open tray technique showed significantly different vertical gaps according to the angulation of implant (P < .05), but the A-F impression technique did not (P > .05). CONCLUSION. The accuracy of the A-F impression technique was superior to that of conventional techniques, and was not affected by the angulation of the implants.
참고문헌 (23)
- Adell R, "A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw", Int J Oral Surg, 10, pp.387~416 (1981)
- Skalak R, "Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses", J Prosthet Dent, 49, pp.843~848 (1983)
- Humphries RM, "The accuracy of implant master casts constructed from transfer impressions", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 5, pp.331~336 (1990)
- Naconecy MM, "Evaluation of accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implantsupported prostheses with multiple abutments", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 19, pp.192~198 (2004)
- Assif D, "Comparative accuracy of implant impression procedures", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 12, pp.112~121 (1992)
- Assif D, "Accuracy of implant impression techniques", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 11, pp.216~222 (1996)
- Vigolo P, "Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions", J Prosthet Dent, 89, pp.186~192 (2003)
- Vigolo P, "An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses", J Prosthet Dent, 92, pp.470~476 (2004)
- Assif D, "Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques:effect of splinting material", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 14, pp.885~888 (1999)
- Fenton A, "The accuracy of implant impression procedures", J Dent Res, 70, pp.396~399 (1991)
- Herbst D, "Evaluation of impression accuracy for osseointegrated implant supported superstructures", J Prosthet Dent, 83, pp.555~561 (2000)
- Hsu CC, "A comparative analysis of the accuracy of implant transfer techniques", J Prosthet Dent, 69, pp.588~593 (1993)
- De La Cruz JE, "Verification jig for implant-supported prostheses:A comparison of standard impressions with verification jigs made of different materials", J Prosthet Dent, 88, pp.329~336 (2002)
- Burawi G, "A comparison of the dimensional accuracy of the splinted and unsplinted impression techniques for the Bone-Lock implant system", J Prosthet Dent, 77, pp.68~75 (1997)
- Inturregui JA, "Evaluation of three impression techniques for osseointegrated oral implants", J Prosthet Dent, 69, pp.503~509 (1993)
- Conrad HJ, "Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants", J Prosthet Dent, 97, pp.349~356 (2007)
- Carr AB, "Comparison of impression techniques for a two-implant 15-degree divergent model", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 7, pp.468~475 (1992)
- Carr AB, "A comparison of impression techniques for a fiveimplant mandibular model", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 6, pp.448~455 (1991)
- Phillips KM, "The accuracy of three implant impression techniques:A three-dimensional analysis", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 9, pp.533~540 (1994)
- Choi JH, "Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 22, pp.761~768 (2007)
- Assuncao WG, "Evaluation of transfer impressions for osseointegrated implants at various angulations", Implant Dentistry, 13, pp.358~364 (2004)
- Vigolo P, "Master cast accuracy in single-tooth implant replacement cases:an in vitro comparison.A technical note", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 20, pp.455~460 (2005)
- Clelland NL, "Comparison of strains produced in a bone simulant between conventional cast and resin-luted implant frameworks", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 12, pp.793~799 (1997)