敬語の変化の捉え方 – 大学生への意識調査から –
Perception of Change in Honorific -A Survey on the Consciousness of University Students-
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Abstract
The present study investigated the normativity and favorability of honorific expressions which are shown in the developmental stage as the process in language change. It also analyzed the steps of expression in honorifics and the reason of ‘yure’ in terms of two main factors. At first, a double honorific is perceived as the type A(right use) and the type D and C followed(it is at the low level of normativity but has favorability), therefore, it is subject to be increased later on. In terms of naming, ‘sama’ and ‘san’ were perceived as the type A and are expected to be settled in the future. On the other hand, the title for position has been considered as the type D but is anticipated to be used gradually later. An honorific for guests, ‘saseteitadaki’ had a high perception as the type A therefore it might be stable as an expression for standard. ‘Sa-irekotoba’ gained more awareness according to the grammaticalization of ‘-itadaku’ but the other expressions are still regarded as the type D. The expression of humbleness and the imbalanced expression are predominantly thought as the type D, but they have a possibility of increasing use because the followings are the type A or C. Lastly, as a result of expression of hospitality, university students had a tendency that they choose to use polite expressions when facing the command or request which is relatively bearable burden. As Ha(2015) mentioned, the result can be assumed as a phenomenon that happens in the process of natural communication based on mutual respect in terms of social language norm.
참고문헌 (20)
- 朝日祥之, "敬語研究と実時間的言語変化研究との接点を求めて", 社会言語科学, 11(1), pp.39~50 (2008), 社会言語科学会
- 井出祥子, "わきまえの語用論", pp.173~ (2006), 大修館書店
- 井上史雄, "言葉の乱れの社会言語学", 日本語学, 12, pp.52~53 (1986), 明治書院
- 井上史雄, "敬語はこわくない―最新用例と基礎知識―", pp.62~ (1999), 講談社現代新書
- 井上史雄, "言語変化の成人後採用―文化庁世論調査による「お」の系譜―", 計量国語学, 27(3), pp.81~103 (2009), 計量国語学会
- 井上史雄, "「お」の使い分けにみる美化語の循環過程―「お使い分け」デ一タの解釈―」", 日本語の研究, 6(4), pp.63~78 (2010), 日本語学会
- 菊地康人, "変わりゆく「させていただく」", 言語, 26(6), pp.40~47 (1997), 大修館書店
- 金田一春彦, "日本語を反省してみませんか", pp.12~ (2002), 角川書店
- 佐野真一郎, "『日本語話し言葉コーパス』に現れる「さ入れ言葉」に関する数量的分析", 言語研究, 133, pp.77~106 (2008), 日本言語学会
- 野口恵子, "バカ丁寧化する日本語―敬語コミュニケ一ションの行方―", pp.58~97 (2009), 光文社新書
- 野口恵子, "失礼な敬語―誤用例から学ぶ、正しい使い方―", pp.107~ (2013), 光文社新書
- 하정일, "関連性理論から見た敬語の過剰使用とその語用論的効果-慇懃無礼を中心に-", 일어일문학연구, 87(1), pp.233~257 (2013), 한국일어일문학회[DOI]
- 河正一, "敬語の過剰使用に関する日韓対照研究", 韓国語教育研究, 5, pp.210~228 (2015), 日本韓国語教育学会
- 河正一, "過剰敬語の規範性と印象について―大学生への意識調査から―", 埼玉大学日本語教育センタ一紀要, 11, pp.15~27 (2017)
- 河正一, "質問紙調査に基づく"慇懃無礼"の意味論と語用論―原型とポライトネスの観点から―", 計量国語学, 28(4), pp.125~152 (2012), 計量国語学会
- 姫野伴子, "「~させていただく」文の与益・使役者と動作対象について", 留学生教育, 6, pp.1~12 (2004), 埼玉大学留学生センター
- "国語に関する世論調査"[URL]
- "敬語の指針"[URL]
- 洞澤伸, "「バイト敬語」を使う若者たち―話し手の心理と聞き手の印象―", 岐阜大学地域科学部研究報告, 19, pp.30~ (2006), 岐阜大学
- 山里優, "「さ入れ言葉」の増加について", 国文学, 94, pp.96~112 (2010), 関西大学国文学会
