“高祖河”在卜辭中的解釋與爭議:連讀還是斷讀?
Interpretations and Controversies Surrounding ‘Gaozuhe’ in Oracle Inscriptions: Continuous or Separate Reading?
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
本文圍繞商代卜辭中的“高祖河”表述,探討了學術界關於連讀與斷讀的不同解讀及其背後的爭議。在甲骨文卜辭中,“高祖河”這一表述的含義有兩種主要解讀。第一種解讀主張將“高祖河”連讀,認爲其中的“河”與“高祖”地位相同,皆爲祖先神。連讀觀點的支持者指出,“高祖”與“河”曾在同版卜辭中並列出現,可能作爲性質相同的祭祀對象進行祭祀,這表明二者可能具有相同的宗教地位。第二種觀點主張斷讀,認爲“河”應被視爲自然神,特別是黃河神,而非祖先神。支持斷讀的學者指出,“高祖”和“河”在卜辭中獨立出現的情況較多,它們各自具有不同的神格與宗教功能,斷讀觀點認爲將“河”視爲自然神更符合殷商社會的祭祀實踐。 本文通過對卜辭內容及相關文獻的深入比較與分析,進一步支持斷讀的解讀方式,認爲“高祖河”應分開斷讀,以更準確地反映殷人信仰體系中祖先神與自然神的獨立性。同時,本文還探討了“河”神的人格化過程,認爲“河”神儘管在後期似乎出現了被納入祖先崇拜體系的情況,但其本質上仍爲自然神。總體來看,將“高祖河”斷讀爲“高祖、河”不僅符合卜辭的表達,更契合殷商社會的實際情況,有助於更清晰地理解殷人複雜的信仰結構。
Abstract
This paper examines the term "Gaozuhe (高祖河)" as it appears in Shang Dynasty oracle bone inscriptions, addressing the academic debate on its continuous versus separate reading. One interpretation proposes that "Gaozuhe" should be read as a single term, with "He (河)" sharing ancestral status with "Gaozu (高祖)" as a joint deity. Alternatively, the separate reading views "Gaozu" and "He" as distinct entities, identifying "He" as a natural deity.Advocates of the separate reading argue that "Gaozu" and "He" often appear independently in inscriptions, signaling distinct divine roles. This paper supports the separate reading, suggesting it more accurately represents the Shang society’s distinction between ancestral and natural deities. Furthermore, it examines the anthropomorphization of "He" ,suggesting that while "He" may have been incorporated into ancestral worship practices, its primary identity remained that of a natural deity. By advocating a divided reading, this study provides a clearer perspective on the complex structure of Shang religious beliefs and ritual practices.
참고문헌 (19)
- 陳夢家, "殷墟卜辭綜述" (1988), 中華書局
- 常玉芝, "商代宗教祭祀" (2010), 中國社會科學出版社
- 戴聖, "禮記" (2017), 中華書局
- 郭沫若, "甲骨文合集" (1978), 中華書局
- 郭璞, "爾雅" (2020), 古籍出版社
- 于省吾, "甲骨文字诂林" (1996), 中華書局
- 張政烺, "盡心集" (1996), 中國社會科學出版社
- 中國社會科學院研究所, "小屯南地甲骨" (1980), 中華書局
- 周公, "周禮" (2017), 中華書局
- 左丘明, "左傳" (2024), 中華書局
- 晁福林, "論殷代神權", 中國社會科學, (1) (1990)
- 李學勤, "評陳夢家『殷墟卜辭綜述』", 考古學報, (3) (1957)
- 李學勤, "論殷代親族制度", 文史哲, (11) (1957)
- 林志強, "論卜辭河嶽之神格", 福建師範大學學報(哲學社會科學版), (2) (1994)
- 羅琨, "卜辭中的“河”及其在祀典中的地位", 古文字研究, 3 (2000)
- 色音, "日本神道教的曆史與現狀", 世界宗教文化, (6) (2014)
- 史大豐, "河伯神話傳說源流探析", 民俗研究, (2) (2021)
- 詹鄞鑫, "河伯娶婦古俗考", 福州大學學報, (1) (2000)
- 章秀霞, "殷卜辭中“高祖河”的點讀問題", 殷都學刊, (2) (2019)
