본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

이윤주도성장에 대한 재고찰: 생산능력을 창출하지 않는 독립지출을 중심으로

Reconsideration on Profit-Led Growth with Non-Capacity Creating Autonomous Demand

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경제학

초록

본 논문은 포스트 칼레츠키안 성장 모형에 스라피안 초승수 접근법의 요소들을 도입했을 때 어떠한 결론의 수정이 나타나는지를 고찰한다. 기존 모형에서는 이윤몫이 투자에 미치는 효과가 크다면 이윤주도수요 및 성장이발생하게 된다. 하지만 증가율이 외생적으로 주어진 생산능력을 창출하지않는 독립지출(NCCAD)과 해로드적 투자 조정이 존재할 경우 이러한 결론은 더 이상 성립하지 않는다. 이윤몫이 증가할 때, 단기적으로는 성장률이증가할 수 있지만 이는 NCCAD의 증가율이 주어졌기 때문에 유지될 수가없다. 정상가동률을 회복하려는 기업의 투자 조정이 결국 독립투자를 감소시켜서 장기적으로는 자본 및 산출 수준의 상대적 감소가 발생한다. 이는 장기유효수요 이론의 관점에서 단기적으로는 이윤주도성장이 나타나더라도 장기적으로는 수준효과의 측면에서 임금주도성장이 발생함을 의미한다

Abstract

This paper considers the post􀀐Kaleckian growth model in with of Sraffian supermultiplier approach. In this model, investment is affected by the normal profit rate, that is, the profit share. So, an increase in profit share directly leads to a decrease in consumption and a increase in investment. If the latter is bigger, profit􀀐led demand and profit􀀐led demand growth may occur. However, the conclusion changes significantly when introducing NCCAD with exogenous growth rate and Harrodian investment adjustment. In the long run, wage􀀐led growth necessarily occurs in terms of level effect. Under profit􀀐led growth regime in the short run, an increase in profit share increases the growth rate. However, this growth rate cannot be sustained because the growth rate of NCCAD does not change. And as the autonomous investment ratio decreases with the Harrodian investment adjustment, the growth rate on the overall adjustment process falls short of the growth rate of NCCAD on average. That is, an increase in profit share results in a relative decrease in the levels of capital and output. In the long run, wage􀀐led growth strategies are always valid, given NCCAD’s steady growth and Harrodian investment adjustment.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. 나원준, "네오 칼레츠키언 모형의 장기 동학과 초승수 효과", 사회경제평론, 30(3), pp.37~61 (2017), 한국사회경제학회[DOI]
  2. 나원준, "소득주도 성장의 경제학" (2018), 해남
  3. 박만섭, "케인즈의 경제학", pp.205~231 (2002), 다산출판사
  4. 박만섭, "경제학 더 넓은지평을 향하여" (2013), 이슈투데이
  5. 연제호, "독립소비지출과 해로드적 투자 조정을 도입한 네오칼레츠키안 성장 모형", 사회경제평론, 33(1), pp.143~188 (2020), 한국사회경제학회[DOI]
  6. 연제호, "정부지출과 정부부채: 스라피안 초승수 접근법을 도입한 네오 칼레츠키안 성장 모형을 활용한 분석", 경제발전연구, 26(1), pp.27~63 (2020), 한국경제발전학회
  7. Allain, O., "Tackling the Instability of Growth : a Kaleckian-Harrodian Model with an Autonomous Expenditure Component", Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39(5), pp.1351~1371 (2015)
  8. Allain, O., "Demographic Growth, Harrodian (In)stability and the Supermultiplier", Cambridge Journal of Economics, 43(1), pp.85~106 (2019)
  9. Amadeo, E, J., "Expectations in a Steady State Model of Capacity Utilization", Political Economy: Studies in the Surplus Approach, 3(1), pp.75~89 (1987)
  10. Bhaduri, A., "Unemployment and the Real Wage: The Economic Basis of Contesting Political Ideologies", Cambridge Journal of Economics, 14(4), pp.375~393 (1990)
  11. Blecker, R. A., "Heterodox Macroeconomics: Models of Demand, Distribution and Growth" (2019), Edward Elgar Pub.
  12. Blecker, R. A., "A Modern Guide to Keynesian Macroeconomics and Economic Policies", pp.215~239 (2011), Edward Elgar
  13. Cesaratto, S., "Neo-Kaleckian and Sraffian Controversies on the Theory of Accumulation", Review of Political Economy, 27(2), pp.154~182 (2015)
  14. Ciccone, R., "Accumulation and Capacity Utilisation: Some Critical Considerations on Joan Robinson’s Theory of Distribution", Political Economy, 2, pp.17~36 (1986)
  15. Deleidi, M., "Putting Austerity to Bed : Technical Progress, Aggregate Demand and the Supermultiplier", Review of Political Economy, 31(3), pp.315~335 (2019)
  16. Detzer, D., "Inequality, Emulation and Debt: The Occurrence of Different Growth Regimes in the Age of Financialization in a Stock-flow Consistent Model", Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 41(2), pp.284~315 (2018)
  17. Dutt, A. K., "Distributional Dynamics in Post Keynesian Growth Models", Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 34(3), pp.431~452 (2012)
  18. Dutt, A. K., "Some Observations on Models of Growth and Distribution with Autonomous Demand Growth", Metroeconomica, 70(2), pp.288~301 (2019)
  19. Eatwell, J., "The Long-period Theory of Employment", Cambridge Journal of Economics, 7(3,4), pp.269~228 (1983)
  20. Fiebiger, B., "Semi-autonomous Household Expenditures as the Causa Causans of Postwar US Business Cycles : The Stability and Instability of Luxemburg-type External Markets", Cambridge Journal of Economics, 42(1), pp.155~175 (2018)
  21. Flaschel, P., "Macrodynamics of Capitalism - Synthesis of Marx" (2009), Springer
  22. Garegnani, P., "The Problem of Effective Demand in Italian Economic Development : On the Factors that Determine the Volume of Investment", Review of Political Economy, 27(2), pp.111~133 (2015)
  23. Persistent Effects of Autonomous Demand Expansions, "Girardi, D.", Institute for New Economic Thinking, ~, pp.Institute for New Economic Thinking Working Paper Series No. 70 (2018)
  24. Goodwin, R., "The Non-linear Accelerator and the Persistence of Business Cycles", Econometrica, 19, pp.1~17 (1951)
  25. Hein, E., "Autonomous Government Expenditure Growth, Deficits, Debt, and Distribution in a Neo-Kaleckian Growth Model", Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 41(2), pp.316~338 (2018)
  26. Kalecki, M., "자본주의 경제 동학 에세이 1933-1970" (2010), 지식을만드는 지식
  27. Kurz, H. D., "Capital, Distribution and Effective Demand" (1990), Polity Press
  28. Lavoie, M., "Post-Keynesian Economics: New Foundations" (2014), Edward Elgar
  29. Lavoie, M., "Convergence towards the Normal Rate of Capacity Utilization in Neo-Kaleckian Models : The Role of Non-Capacity Creating Autonomous Expenditures", Metroeconomica, 67(1), pp.172~201 (2016)
  30. Luxemburg, R., "자본의 축적1, 2" (2013), 지식을만드는지식
  31. Nah, W. J., "Long Run Convergence in a Neo-Kaleckian Open-economy Model with Autonomous Export Growth", Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 40(2), pp.223~238 (2017)
  32. Nah, W. J., "Convergence in a Neo-Kaleckian Model with Endogenous Technical Progress and Autonomous Demand growth", Review of Keynesian Economics, 7(3), pp.275~291 (2019)
  33. Nah, W. J., "The Role of Autonomous Demand Growth in a Neo-Kaleckian Conflicting-Claims Framework", Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 51, pp.427~444 (2019)
  34. "Some Comments on the Sraffian Supermultiplier Approach to Growth and Distribution" (2018)[URL]
  35. Palley, T., "Growth, Unemployment and Endogenous Technical Progress", Metroeconomica, 63(3), pp.512~541 (2012)
  36. Palley, T., "The Economics of the Super-multiplier : A Comprehensive Treatment with Labor Markets", Metroeconomica, 70(2), pp.325~340 (2018)
  37. Pariboni, R., "Autonomous Demand and Capital Accumulation: Three Essays on Heterodox Growth Theory", Ph.D., Department of Political Economy and Statistics, pp.2015
  38. Park, M. S., "A Note on the Kalecki-Steindl Steady-State Approach to Growth and Distribution", Manchester School, 63(3), pp.297~310 (1995)
  39. Park, M. S., "Autonomous Demand and the Warranted Rate of Growth", Contributions to Political Economy, 19, pp.1~18 (2000)
  40. Sasaki, H., "Growth, Cycles and Distribution: A Kaleckian Approach" (2014), Kyoto University Press
  41. Skott, P., "Conflict and Effective Demand in Economic Growth" (1989), Cambridge University Press
  42. Skott, P., "Autonomous Demand, Harrodian Instability and the Supply Side", Metroeconomica, 70(2), pp.233~246 (2017)
  43. Taylor, L., "Real and Money Wages, Output and Inflation in the Semi-Industrialized World", Economia, 57, pp.329~353 (1990)
  44. Taylor, L., "Reconstructing Macroeconomics: Structuralist Proposals and Critiques of the Mainstream" (2004), Harvard University Press
  45. Vianello, F., "Kalecki’s Relevance Today" (1989), Macmillan
  46. Wen, Y., "Granger Causality and Equilibrium Business Cycle Theory", Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 89(3), pp.195~206 (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)