‘V起来了’와 ‘V了起来’의 대조 연구 — 문법화이론을 중심으로
A Comparative Study of ‘V-Qilai-Le’ and ‘V-Le-Qilai’ from the Perspective of Grammaticalization
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
‘V-Qilai-Le’ itself is composed of ‘resultative construction’ and ‘Le’, while ‘V-Le-Qilai’ is a structure with ‘Qilai’ placed behind ‘Le’, so ‘V-Le-Qilai’ should be distinguished from the typical resultative construction. This article focuses on this point and studies the differences of two constructions from grammaticalization perspective. The research results show that these two constructions are not only different in categories of ‘Le’, but also can be regarded as different syntactic environments. This makes the ‘Qilai’s of the two constructions undergo different grammaticalization processes and it results in different semantic divergence. As a result, these two constructions are further subdivided than just two types which are generally pointed out by previous scholars as follows: Furthermore, the co-occurrence of ‘Qilai’ and ‘Le’ differs, the meaning of construction also differs accordingly. All types of ‘V-Qilai-Le’ construction focus on results and are divided into ‘Actualization of result’, ‘Change of state’, and ‘Actualization of result & Persistence of state at the same time’ depending on the type of ‘Le’ that is joined at the end. On the other hand, the ‘V-Le-Qilai’ construction mainly focuses on the description: the first one describes continuous action; the second one describes the beginning of the state. In this case, ‘Le’ corresponds to ‘Le1’.
Abstract
‘V-Qilai-Le’ itself is composed of ‘resultative construction’ and ‘Le’, while ‘V-Le-Qilai’ is a structure with ‘Qilai’ placed behind ‘Le’, so ‘V-Le-Qilai’ should be distinguished from the typical resultative construction. This article focuses on this point and studies the differences of two constructions from grammaticalization perspective. The research results show that these two constructions are not only different in categories of ‘Le’, but also can be regarded as different syntactic environments. This makes the ‘Qilai’s of the two constructions undergo different grammaticalization processes and it results in different semantic divergence. As a result, these two constructions are further subdivided than just two types which are generally pointed out by previous scholars as follows: Furthermore, the co-occurrence of ‘Qilai’ and ‘Le’ differs, the meaning of construction also differs accordingly. All types of ‘V-Qilai-Le’ construction focus on results and are divided into ‘Actualization of result’, ‘Change of state’, and ‘Actualization of result & Persistence of state at the same time’ depending on the type of ‘Le’ that is joined at the end. On the other hand, the ‘V-Le-Qilai’ construction mainly focuses on the description: the first one describes continuous action; the second one describes the beginning of the state. In this case, ‘Le’ corresponds to ‘Le1’.
참고문헌 (32)
- 이화승, "복합추향보어와 ‘了’의 위치에 따른 의미자질 ― ‘起來’와 ‘過來’를 중심으로", 중국문학연구, (49), pp.303~325 (2012), 한국중문학회
- 이화영, "조사 ‘了’의 용법 연구", 중국학논총, (22), pp.51~74 (2006), 한국중국문화학회
- 장태원, "조사 ‘了’자의 어법기능연구", 중국어문학, 15, pp.319~351 (1988)
- 최규발, "현대중국어 상 표지로의 문법화 조건 - 존재동사와 이동동사를 중심으로", 중국학논총, (31), pp.67~86 (2011), 중국학연구소[DOI]
- 최규발, "현대중국어 ‘V了起來₂’와 ‘V起來₂了’", 중국학논총, (35), pp.21~37 (2012), 중국학연구소[DOI]
- 최규발, "중국어의 PVC에 관한 소고", 중국어문논총, (45), pp.1~18 (2010), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
- 曹廣顺, "近代汉语助词" (1997), 商務印書館
- 陈刚, "试论“动-了-趋”式和“动-将-趋”式", 中国語文, (4), pp.282~287 (1987)
- 戴耀晶, "現代漢語時態系統研究" (1997), 浙江敎育出版社
- 范繼淹, "動詞和趨向性後置成分的結構分析", 中国語文, (2), pp.136~160 (1963)
- 高順全, "複合趨向補語引申用法的語義解释", 漢語學習, (2), pp.56~61 (2005)
- 賀陽, "動趨式“V起来”的語義分化及其句法表現", 語言研究, (3), pp.23~31 (2004)
- 胡裕樹, "動詞硏究" (1995), 河南大学出版社
- 金立鑫, "試論“了”的時態特徵", 語言敎學與研究, (1), pp.105~119 (1998)
- 金立鑫, "現代漢語“了”研究中的“語義第一动力”的局限", 漢語學習, (5), pp.1~5 (1999)
- 金立鑫, "詞尾“了”的時態意義及句法條件", 世界汉语教学, (1), pp.34~43 (2002)
- 金立鑫, "“S了”的時態意義及其句法條件", 語言敎學與研究, (2), pp.38~48 (2003)
- 劉勛寧, "現代漢語句尾“了”的来源", 方言, (2), pp.128~133 (1985)
- 劉勛寧, "現代漢語詞尾“了”的語法意義及其與詞尾“了”的聯係", 世界漢語敎學, (2), pp.80~87 (1990)
- 劉勛寧, "現代漢語的句子構造与詞尾“了”的語法位置", 語言敎學與研究, (3), pp.4~22 (1999)
- 劉勛寧, "現代漢語句尾“了”的語法意義及其解說", 世界漢語敎學, (3), pp.70~79 (2002)
- 劉月華, "趋向补语通释" (1998), 北京语言文化大学出版社
- 吕叔湘, "現代漢語八百詞" (1999), 商務印書館
- 彭小用, "也談“了2”的語法意義", 學術交流, (1), pp.136~141 (2005)
- 沈家煊, "“語法化”研究縱觀", 外語敎學與研究, (4), pp.17~24 (1994)
- 唐正大, "語法化與語法研究(二)" (2005), 商務印書館
- 吴福祥, "漢語語法化硏究" (2005), 商務印書館
- 楊德峰, "“动+趋+了”和“动+了+趋”补议", 中国語文, (4), pp.329~334 (2001)
- 楊德峰, "用于將來的“动+了+趨”初探", 語言研究, (2), pp.78~84 (2002)
- 楊依萍, "現代漢語"了"的多角度考察" (2007), 浙江大学
- 姚婷, "“起来”與助詞“了”的同現情況考察", 九江學院學報, (1), pp.100~103 (2008)
- 張健, "關于帶“了”的動趨結構", 漢語學習, (2), pp.20~23 (1991)