현대중국어 좌향전이 이중타동구문의 논항 실현 양상 고찰
The Mechanism of Argument Realization of Left-Transfer Ditransitive Construction in Chinese
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to account for the mechanism of Chineseleft-transfer ditransitive construction(also called malefactive source construction). In Chinese, a malefactive-source verb is a verb which can take a subject and twoobjects which refer to a theme and a recipient(source). According to linguisticsconsiderations, these objects are called direct and indirect. This is in contrast tomonotransitive verbs, which take only one object. In Chinese, it is common todifferentiate the objects of a ditransitive verb using word order or context. Themain idea of this paper is that the semantic prototype of ditransitivity is definedby the ‘the Maximally Distinguished Arguments Hypothesis’. According to theMaximally Distinguished Arguments Hypothesis, the A-R-T argument categoriesshould be defined so as to be maximally semantically distinct.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to account for the mechanism of Chineseleft-transfer ditransitive construction(also called malefactive source construction). In Chinese, a malefactive-source verb is a verb which can take a subject and twoobjects which refer to a theme and a recipient(source). According to linguisticsconsiderations, these objects are called direct and indirect. This is in contrast tomonotransitive verbs, which take only one object. In Chinese, it is common todifferentiate the objects of a ditransitive verb using word order or context. Themain idea of this paper is that the semantic prototype of ditransitivity is definedby the ‘the Maximally Distinguished Arguments Hypothesis’. According to theMaximally Distinguished Arguments Hypothesis, the A-R-T argument categoriesshould be defined so as to be maximally semantically distinct.
참고문헌 (17)
- Knud Lambrecht, "정보 구조와 문장 형식" (2000), 월인출판사
- Simon C. Dik, "기능문법론" (2006), 홍익출판사
- 강병규, "구문문법이론에 기초한 중국어 동사와 논항 실현 양상 고찰—이중타동구문을 중심으로", 중국문학, 75, pp.217~254 (2013), 한국중국어문학회
- 金瑛, "현대중국어 이중목적어구문의 어법특성 연구", 박사, 중어중문학과 중국어학전공, pp.2014
- 백은희, "선진시기 이중목적어 구문의 의미지도와 논항 배열 규칙", 중국언어연구, (49), pp.97~127 (2013), 한국중국언어학회
- 연재훈, "한국어 구문 유형론" (2011), 태학사
- 程樂樂, "現代漢語索取雙賓句硏究" (2010), 武漢大學出版社
- 陸儉明, "再談‘他吃了三個蘋果’一類結構的性質", 構式語法硏究 (2011)
- 張國憲, "制約奪事成分句位實現的語義因素", 中國語文, 6 (2001)
- 張伯江, "現代漢語的雙及物結構式", 中國語文, 3 (1999)
- 朱德熙, "語法講義" (1982), 商務印書館
- Adele E. Goldberg, "A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure" (1995), The University of Chicago Press
- Ashild Næss, "Prototypical Transitivity" (2007), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Hopper, "Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse", Language, 56 (1980)
- Malchukov, "Studies in Ditransitive Constructions: A Comparative Handbook" (2010), Walter de Gruyter
- Margetts, "Three participant events in the languages of the world: towards a crosslinguistic typology", Linguistics, 45 (2007)
- Seppo Kittilä, "Transitivity: Towards a Comprehensive Typology" (2002), University of Turku