본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

동작의 복수성에서 나타나는 상호이행 현상 일고찰

A Study on the Cross-executive Phenomena in the plurality of the movement of the verb's predicate

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

運動の複数性は個別具体的な運動から抽象性を含む運動まで連続しながらも異な る事態を表しているが、これらを再確認するために運動間の相互移行現象について 考察してみた。相互移行を妨げる要素は時間と運動の量だけでなく、意味的に理由 や目的がある運動の場合も相互移行を不可能にする要素として作用することが分 かった。動的述語で現れる運動の複数性を明確に理解するためには、コンテキスト の環境を把握しなければならないということである。一つの文章だけで運動の複数性を把握すると、時間と運動の量の抽象化はもちろん、その意味の把握がし難くな り、運動の本来の意味が捉えられない。本稿では相互移行現象に関与する文法的特 徴と意味機能から、運動の複数性は連続しながらも異なる出来事であることを再確 認した。

Abstract

The study of the Aspect tens represented in verb predicate has been widely and deeply considered, but the study of the plurality of motion seen in it is not yet active enough to be considered unfamiliar. Usually, plurality of motion, called repetition and habit, has been studied very briefly as a derivative of Aspect. For this reason, the classification of repeatability and habitability is not well established. In this study, we consider the plurality of motion to be <multiplexity>, <repeatness> and <habituality> and study inter-implementation phenomena that occur between them. Not only have we not distinguished repetition from habituality by the commonality of the plurality of movements, but we have also considered polygamy, which is a repetition of simple movements, as a method of repetition habituality. Furthermore, the term multiple is briefly described in Kudo(2014), distinguishing between multiple, repetitive, and habitual, with only a simple organization of terms rather than detailed usage examples. In response, this study is also conducting a detailed study of borderline motion movements in which ambiguity exists between each motor movement, depending on the classification of the plurality of motor movements as multiplexity, repeat and habituality. In order to establish a clearer position on the repeatability of the motion, we examined the phenomenon of mutual implementation between each exercise. To date, the results of mutual implementation have shown that, based on temporal sincerity, the implementation of motion to high levels (multiple>repetitive>habitual) is not entirely original in both cases (multiple> repetitive>habitual). However, they were able to identify the semantic features of non-typical motion through the mutual transition phenomenon.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. "毎日新聞", ~ (2014)
  2. 東野圭吾, "秘密" (2001), 文春文庫
  3. 東野圭吾, "赤い指" (2009), 講談社文庫
  4. 奥田靖雄, "時間表現の(1)(2)", pp.94~100 (1998), 教育国語
  5. 工藤真由美, "アスペクト・テンス体系とテクスト", pp.146~161 (1995), ひつじ書房
  6. 工藤真由美, "現象と本質―方言の文法と標準語の文法", 日本語文法, pp.48~62 (2002)
  7. 工藤真由美, "現代日本語ムード・テンス・アスペクト論", pp.193~229 (2014), ひつじ書房
  8. 佐久間鼎, "日本語の表現と語法", pp.139~176 (1966), 恒星社厚生閣
  9. 佐藤里美, "名詞述語文の意味的なタイプ", ことばの科学, 8, pp.152~200 (1997), むぎ書房
  10. 佐藤里美, "テクストにおける名詞述語文の機能―小説の地の文における質・特性表現と《説明》-", ことばの科学, 10, pp.67~79 (2001), むぎ書房
  11. 鈴木重幸, "日本語文法・形態論", pp.253~349 (1972), むぎ書房
  12. 須田義治, "現代日本語のアスペクト論", pp.50~99 (2010), ひつじ書房
  13. 高橋太郎, "現代日本語動詞のアスペクトとテンス", pp.85~112 (1985), 国立国語研究所秀英出版
  14. 高橋太郎, "動詞九章", pp.84~87 (2003), ひつじ書房
  15. 寺村秀夫, "日本語のシンタクスと意味Ⅱ", pp.123~146 (1984), くろしお出版
  16. 仁田義雄, "副詞的表現の諸相", pp.201~232 (2002), くろしお出版
  17. 日本語記述文法研究会, "現代日本語文法3アスペクト・テンス・否定", pp.29~60 (2003), くろしお出版
  18. 樋口文彦, "形容詞の評価的な意味", ことばの科学, 10, pp.43~66 (2001), むぎ書房
  19. 八亀裕美, "AにしてはBをめぐって―時間的限定性と評価性―", ことばの科学, 11, pp.207~214 (2006), むぎ書房
  20. Comrie, B, "Aspect : An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems", pp.24~32 (1976), Cambridge University Press
  21. Givón, T., "Syntax: An Introduction", pp.23~49 (2001), John Benjamins

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)