본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

신탁제도를 통한 미성년자 보호에 관한 연구

A Study on Protection for Minors through Trusts

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

This study on protection for minors through trusts starts from realizing functional limitation of the guardian system under the Civil Code of Korea (the “Civil Code”). A minor, without his biological or legal parents, has a guardian who has a general legal power to act on behalf of a minor; provided that the Civil Code provides that certain transactions, including a sale of real property owned by the minor,must obtain an approval from the association of family members of the minor. This is regarded as a preventative measure for protecting minor’s interests from the guardian abusing his power. Practically,however, this limitation does not work properly; the guardian has a control over the association of family members because such members usually consist of a spouse or siblings of the guardian. For this reason,there exist many court cases nullifying the guardian’s legal act on behalf of the minor. Given that the guardian system under the Civil Code has its own limitation, a trust can be a very useful device to protect the minor’s interests. In the U.S., support trusts are widely used for managing the assets to be inherited to their children as a substitute way of inheritance. Using flexibility in design of the trusts, the children may become beneficiaries of the support trust upon their parents’ death and the trustee manages the inherited assets (i.e., trust assets) and distributes the children such an amount of money in the form of trust interests as required for their accustomed living until they become a majority. The trustee is generally not allowed to sell the trust assets and the trust assets themselves will be transferred to the children when they become major in accordance with the terms of conditions of support trusts established by their parents. In this way, the inherited assets can be protected and reserved until a minor becomes major. The trusts have not been widely used in Korea since Korea is a civil law country and not familiar with trust system. However, due to flexibility in design of the trusts, the demand for various types of trust transactions, such as real property development trusts and welfare trusts, is increasing in Korea. Additionally, an entire amendment of the Trust Law of Korea (the “new Trust Law”) was made to accommodates the demand for trust transactions and will be effective from July 2012. Trusts can be effectively used in Korea for the purpose of supporting minors by managing their inherited assets as Korea gets familiar with the trust system under the new Trust Law.

Abstract

This study on protection for minors through trusts starts from realizing functional limitation of the guardian system under the Civil Code of Korea (the “Civil Code”). A minor, without his biological or legal parents, has a guardian who has a general legal power to act on behalf of a minor; provided that the Civil Code provides that certain transactions, including a sale of real property owned by the minor,must obtain an approval from the association of family members of the minor. This is regarded as a preventative measure for protecting minor’s interests from the guardian abusing his power. Practically,however, this limitation does not work properly; the guardian has a control over the association of family members because such members usually consist of a spouse or siblings of the guardian. For this reason,there exist many court cases nullifying the guardian’s legal act on behalf of the minor. Given that the guardian system under the Civil Code has its own limitation, a trust can be a very useful device to protect the minor’s interests. In the U.S., support trusts are widely used for managing the assets to be inherited to their children as a substitute way of inheritance. Using flexibility in design of the trusts, the children may become beneficiaries of the support trust upon their parents’ death and the trustee manages the inherited assets (i.e., trust assets) and distributes the children such an amount of money in the form of trust interests as required for their accustomed living until they become a majority. The trustee is generally not allowed to sell the trust assets and the trust assets themselves will be transferred to the children when they become major in accordance with the terms of conditions of support trusts established by their parents. In this way, the inherited assets can be protected and reserved until a minor becomes major. The trusts have not been widely used in Korea since Korea is a civil law country and not familiar with trust system. However, due to flexibility in design of the trusts, the demand for various types of trust transactions, such as real property development trusts and welfare trusts, is increasing in Korea. Additionally, an entire amendment of the Trust Law of Korea (the “new Trust Law”) was made to accommodates the demand for trust transactions and will be effective from July 2012. Trusts can be effectively used in Korea for the purpose of supporting minors by managing their inherited assets as Korea gets familiar with the trust system under the new Trust Law.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. 김용한, "친족상속법" (2002), 박영사
  2. 김주수, "친족⋅상속법(제10판)" (2011), 법문사
  3. 김형석, "민법개정안 해설", 성년후견제 도입을 위한 민법개정안 공청회 자료 (2009)
  4. 송덕수, "신민법강의 제4판" (2011), 박영사
  5. 송호열, "행위무능력제도와 후견제도의 문제점", 동아법학, (35) (2004)
  6. 윤진수, "친족회의 동의를 얻지 않은 후견인의 법률행위에 대한 표현대리의 성립 여부", 민사법학, (19) (2001), 한국민사법학회
  7. 이연갑, "신탁법상 신탁의 구조와 수익자 보호에 관한 비교법적 연구", 박사, pp.2009
  8. 이연갑, "기부금법과 신탁법리", 민사법학, (39-1), pp.377~413 (2007), 한국민사법학회
  9. 이재숙, "미성년자 후견제도의 실태와 개선방안", 석사, pp.2000
  10. 정소민, "신탁의 설정에 관한 소고 - 공통참조기준초안(Draft Common Frame of Reference)을 중심으로 -", 외법논집, 33(3), pp.49~79 (2009), 법학연구소
  11. 지원림, "민법강의" (2011), 홍문사
  12. 최수정, "상속수단으로서의 신탁", 민사법학, (34), pp.565~602 (2006), 한국민사법학회
  13. 최수정, "신탁제도를 통한 고령자의 보호와 지원" (2010), 집문당
  14. 최은순, "민사신탁에 관한 연구 : 유용성과 적용범위를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2010
  15. Evelyn Ginsberg Abravanel, "Discretionary Support Trusts", Iowa L. Rev, 68 (1983)
  16. Frolik, "Advising the Elderly or Disabled Client; Second Edition" (2011)
  17. John Duddington, "Essentials of Equity and Trust Law" (2006)
  18. Paul G. Haskell, "Preface to Wills, Trusts and Administration 2nd" (1994), The Foundation Press, Inc
  19. David J. Hayton, "The Law of Trusts, 4ed" (2003)
  20. Graham Moffat, "Trusts Law Text and Materials(Fourth Edition)" (2005)
  21. Austin Wakeman Scott, "Scott & Ascher on Trusts, vol. 2. (Fifth Edition)" (2006), Aspen Publishers
  22. Bamberger, "Beck’scher Online-Kommentar BGB, Stand: 01.03.2011, Edition: 22", ~
  23. "Münchener Kommentar zum BGB, Band 5, 5. Aufl.", ~ (2009)
  24. "Münchener Kommentar zum BGB, 6. Auff.", ~ (2012)
  25. Erman, "Kommentar zum BGB, 12. Aufl." (2008)
  26. "juris Praxiskommentar, 4. Aufl.", ~ (2010)
  27. Kollhosser, "Aktuelle Fragen der vorweggenommenen Erbfolge", AcP, 194, pp.231~ (1994)
  28. Palandt, "BGB, 70. Aufl.", ~ (2011)
  29. Staudinger, "Kommentar zum BGB, Schenkungsrecht, § 516-534", ~ (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)