산림레포츠에 대한 국민 인식 및 요구 특성 분석 - 선형과 비선형 활동 비교를 중심으로 -
Analysis of Public Perception and Demand Characteristics for Forest Leisure & Sports – A Comparative Analysis of Linear and Nonlinear Activities –
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
최근 산림레포츠에 대한 수요가 증가하면서 활동 유형 특성을 고려한 지속가능한 산림자원의 관리가 필요하다. 이를 위해 법정 산림레포츠 13개 활동을 대상으로 산림자원의 선형 및 비선형 활용 측면에서 국민인식 및 요구특성을 살펴보았다. 조사는 구조화된 설문지를 활용하여 2022년 10월 21일 ~ 26일까지 웹 설문방식으로 만 19세 이상 국민 313명을 대상으로 실시하였다. 분석은 SPSS 20.0을 활용하여 t 검증(t-test), 카이제곱 검증(Chi-squared test), 탐색적 요인분석(Factor Analysis)을 사용하였다. 산림레포츠 활동 유형은 숲길 또는 임도를 중심으로 활동하는 산악마라톤, 산악자전거 등 5개 종목은 선형 활동, 단위시설 중심으로 숲 전체를 활용하는 패러글라이딩, 암벽타기 등 8개 종목은 비선형 활동으로 분류되었다. 각 유형별 인식과 요구를 분석한 결과 활동 선택에 미치는 요인은 선형 활동 경험자들은 안전성(24.0%), 수려한 자연경관(24.0%)로 나타났고, 비선형 활동의 경험자들은 안전성(32.3%), 접근성(17.9%) 등으로 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 관심도(3.66>3.27)와 안전도(3.26>3.00)는 선형 활동이 모두 높게 나타나 비선형 활동 경험자들의 관심도와 안전도가 상대적으로 낮았다. 정책 요구는 안전관리 정책 요구(3.93<4.35), 인프라 및 프로그램 개선(3.81<4.00) 등 모두 비선형 활동 유형이 요구도가 높았다. 지속가능한 산림자원의 관리에 기반한 산림레포츠 활성화를 위해서는 산림레포츠 활동 특성에 따라 차이가 발생하는 인식 및 요구가 반영된 정책 대안이 마련되어야 한다.
Abstract
With the increasing demand for forest leisure&sports, it is essential to manage forest resources sustainably, considering the characteristics of different activity types. To address this, we examined public awareness and preferences related to forest resources utilization for 13 legally recognized forest leisure&sports activities. The survey was conducted using a structured questionnaire via web-based surveys from October 21 to 26, 2022, targeting 500 adults aged 19 and above. We employed statistical analyses, including t-tests, chi-squared tests, and exploratory factor analysis using SPSS 20.0. The forest leisure&sports activities were categorized into linear and nonlinear types. Linear activities, such as mountain marathons and mountain biking centered around forest trails or paths, comprised five categories. Nonlinear activities, including paragliding and rock climbing, which utilize the entire forest area, consisted of eight categories. Analyzing perceptions and preferences for each type, we found that safety (24.0%) and scenic natural landscapes (24.0%) significantly influenced the choice of linear activities among experienced participants. In contrast, nonlinear activity participants emphasized safety (32.3%) and accessibility (17.9%). Linear activities scored higher in interest (3.66 > 3.27) and perceived safety (3.26 > 3.00) compared to nonlinear activities, where interest and safety were relatively lower. Policy recommendations should consider these differences in perception and demands based on the characteristics of forest leisure&sports activities to promote sustainable forest resource management and enhance forest leisure&sports.
참고문헌 (20)
- Chae, J. H., "Analysis of Factors Influencing Service Quality Satisfaction of Visitors Based on the PCSI Model – Comparison of Recreation Forest & Healing Forest", Journal of the Korean Institute of Forest Recreation, 27(3), pp.53~66 (2023)
- Jeon, K. S., "The choice ofbehaviours and destinations of outdoor recreation users", Journal of Life Science and Natural resources Research, 22, pp.77~86 (2000)
- Kim, C. W., "Cross-cultural study of the relationship between leisure and quality of life", The Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 19(2), pp.1~15 (2005)
- Kim, H., "Analysis among Psychological Variables by Forest Recreation and Welfare Activities Participants", Korean Journal of Forest Economics, 29(2), pp.119~129 (2022)
- Forest Leisure Sports Revitalization Trends and Implications in Japan, "Kim, S. H.", National Institute of Forest Science, 1~24 (2023)
- Koo, D. Y., "A study on change of satisfaction and loyalty according to the service quality of trail riding activity", Journal of the Korean Institute of Forest Recreation, 19(3), pp.41~49 (2015)
- Koo, D. Y., "A Study on Status Forest Leisure Sports and Necessity of Introduction of Qualification System", Journal of the Korean Institute of Forest Recreation, 20(1), pp.19~27 (2020)
- Survey Report for Understanding the Demand Market of Forest Healing, "Korea Forest Service", ~ (2009)
- Forest Leisure Sports Facilities Operation Survey and Manual Development, "Korea Forest Service", ~ (2016)
- Basic Plan for Promoting Forest Leisure & Sports(2022~2026), "Korea Forest Service", ~ (2021)
- Survey on Forest Recreation and Welfare Activities, "Korea Forest Service", ~ (2022)
- Research on Legislation for Revitalization of Forest Recreational Sports, "Korea Forest Service", ~ (2022)
- 2019년 Leisure Sports Industry Survey, "Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism", ~ (2020)
- 2020년 Leisure Sports Industry Survey, "Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism", ~ (2021)
- Operation Case and Implication of Forest Recreation and Leisure Sport In Australia, "Lee, J. H.", National Institute of Forest Science, 1~18 (2018)
- Lee, K. H., "The analysis of leisure activity satisfaction with special reference to Daegu citizen", Journal of the Korean Institute of Forest Recreation, 13(4), pp.43~50 (2009)
- National Leisure Activity Survey, "Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism", ~ (2022)
- Oliver, R. L., "Measurement and Evaluation of Satisfaction Processing, RetailTatting", Journal of Retailing, 157(3), pp.460~469 (1981)
- Seok, B. G., "A Study on the Necessity Recognition of the Leisure Sport Planner in Terms of Leisure Sport Participation Motivation and Preference", Korea Entertainment Industry Association, 7(1), pp.50~58 (2013)
- Yoon J. H., "A Study on The Influence Relationship of Tourism Motivations, Variable Options and Satisfactions in The Family Tourists", Journal of Tourism and Leisure Research, 22(5), pp.283~301 (2010)