보어절과 부가어절로부터의 부정극어 인허
NPI Licensing from Complement and Adjunct Clauses
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The C-command relationship between negative polarity items (NPIs) and negation is generally unrestricted in English, except when an island intervenes. This paper observes that in Korean, the relationship between NPIs and negation remains similarly unrestricted, except when an island or tense is involved. NPIs receive long-distance licensing across the complementizer ‘-ko’ only when the non-finite embedded predicate is both individual-level and non-finite. However, NPIs receive long-distance licensing across the complementizer ‘-ki’ regardless of whether the non-finite embedded predicate is individual-level or stage-level. NPIs are not licensed across the embedded clauses containing the predicate ‘–ess’, which denotes a foreseeable future tense. A bi-clausal structure is deemed unacceptable because the NPI within the finite embedded clause fails to meet the licensing conditions, although a higher NPI satisfies the clause-mate condition. The NPI ‘-pakkey’ also receives long-distance licensing across a non-finite embedded clause. Additionally, the paper argues that NPIs of the ‘amwuto’ type are licensed by the adverbial subordinator ‘-ceney’, whereas the NPI ‘-pakkey’ is not. Finally, the paper contends that the NPI ‘-pakkey’ cannot be licensed from an adverbial clause.
Abstract
The C-command relationship between negative polarity items (NPIs) and negation is generally unrestricted in English, except when an island intervenes. This paper observes that in Korean, the relationship between NPIs and negation remains similarly unrestricted, except when an island or tense is involved. NPIs receive long-distance licensing across the complementizer ‘-ko’ only when the non-finite embedded predicate is both individual-level and non-finite. However, NPIs receive long-distance licensing across the complementizer ‘-ki’ regardless of whether the non-finite embedded predicate is individual-level or stage-level. NPIs are not licensed across the embedded clauses containing the predicate ‘–ess’, which denotes a foreseeable future tense. A bi-clausal structure is deemed unacceptable because the NPI within the finite embedded clause fails to meet the licensing conditions, although a higher NPI satisfies the clause-mate condition. The NPI ‘-pakkey’ also receives long-distance licensing across a non-finite embedded clause. Additionally, the paper argues that NPIs of the ‘amwuto’ type are licensed by the adverbial subordinator ‘-ceney’, whereas the NPI ‘-pakkey’ is not. Finally, the paper contends that the NPI ‘-pakkey’ cannot be licensed from an adverbial clause.
참고문헌 (47)
- 김동석, "주격과 대격의 교체", 우리말글, 26, pp.29~44 (2002)
- 김보라, "장거리 부정극어 허가 구문의 통사구조 : 러시아어와 마케도니아어를 중심으로", 언어와 언어학, 73, pp.55~70 (2016)
- 마군몽, "한국어 ‘-었-’의 ‘가까운 미래’ 용법에 대한 연구", 언어학연구, 29(1), pp.1~23 (2024)
- 박승윤, "‘밖에’의 문법화 현상", 언어, 22(1), pp.57~70 (1997)
- 시정곤, "국어의 부정극어 허가조건", 언어, 22(3), pp.471~497 (1997)
- 이두원, "의문사(구)의 장거리 일치와 부정극어의 장거리 인허", 언어학 연구, 68, pp.1~21 (2024)
- 이두원, "비정형절로부터의 부정극어 인허", 영어영문학, 29(3), pp.21~47 (2024)
- 이수득, "國語先語末語尾의 意味와 解釋에 관한 硏究", 박사, pp.2002
- 이선영, "한국어 부정극어와 부정어 의존성에 대한 실시간 문장 처리실험 연구", 현대문법연구, 95, pp.19~36 (2017)
- 임칠성, "미래 부정의 ‘다-았-’ 연구", 국어국문학, 103, pp.277~292 (1990)
- 정대식, "한국어의 부정극어 인허과정의 재검토", 국어학, 107, pp.297~323 (2023)
- 주은경, "‘-게, -도록, -려고’ 형 필수적 부사형과 한국어 보절 체계의의미론: 목적절이 보절화 책략으로 활용되는 구성을 중심으로", 한국어 의미학, 78, pp.277~310 (2022)
- 최동주, "국어 사상체계의 통시적 변화" (2015), 태학사
- 최정진, "한국어 선어말 어미의 시제성과 양태성 연구 : :'-었-, -겠-, -더-, -느-'를 중심으로", 박사, 국어국문학과 국어학전공, pp.2012
- 한동완, "국어의 시제 연구" (1996), 태학사
- 홍기선, "영어의 결과구문과 한국어"게"구문", 언어, 36(4), pp.1143~1169 (2011)
- 홍용철, "한국에서의 예외격(ECM)구문과 자동 주격 분석", 생성문법연구, 24(3), pp.659~686 (2014)
- Choe, Hyun-Sook, "Restructuring parameters and complex predicates: A transformational approach", pp.1988
- Choi, Young-Shik, "Korean resultative construction redux", The Journal of Studies in Language, 38(2), pp.169~187 (2022)
- Chomsky, Noam, "Formal syntax", pp.71~132 (1977), Academic Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "Ken Hale: A life in language" (2001), MIT Press
- Chung, Daeho, "Polarity licensing by inherently negative predicates : A unified approach", Studies in Generative Grammar, 16(2), pp.211~230 (2006)
- Diesing, Molly, "Indefinite" (1992), MIT Press
- Haegeman, Liliane, "Introduction to government and binding theory" (1998), Blackwell
- Hwang, Juhyeon, "Intervention constraint and licensing of negative polarity items", Korean Journal of Linguistics, 35(4), pp.1173~1190 (2010)
- Hwang, Juhyeon, "Positional restrictions on multiple NPIs in Korean", Studies in Linguistics, 41, pp.419~438 (2016)
- Kang, Young-Sey, "The key constructions in Korean predicate : Head or a complementizer", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 9, pp.433~442 (2001)
- Kim, Dong-Suk, "Korean ECM constructions and the theory of phase", Studies in Modern Grammar, 33, pp.47~77 (2004)
- Kim, Soowon, "Resultatives: English vs. Korean", Journal of Korean Linguistics, 7, pp.363~379 (1998)
- Kim, Sun-Woong, "The negative polarity item licensing in Korean", Studies in Generative Grammar, 5(1), pp.239~264 (1995)
- Kuno, Susumu, "Negative polarity items in Korean and English", Paper in Korean Workshop at SOAS (1994)
- Kuno, Susumu, "Studies in Korean syntax and semantics by Susumu Kuno", pp.207~228 (2004), International Circle of Korean Linguistics
- Lee, Hyeran, "A raising-to-object analysis of Korean ECM constructions", Studies in Generative Grammar, 17(3), pp.363~398 (2007)
- Lee, Hyunoo, "The morphology-based semantics of “any” in English and Korean", Enehak, 31, pp.127~158 (2002)
- Lee, Jeong-Shik, "Some remarks on NPI licensing", Studies in Generative Grammar, 20(2), pp.251~276 (2010)
- Lee, Rhanghyeyun. K, "NPI licensing and the domain of A-movement", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 5, pp.389~400 (1993)
- Lee, Soo-Hwan, "Introducing arguments and case", pp.2024
- Lee, Wooseung, "ECM constructions redux", Korean Journal of Linguistics, 37(3), pp.697~718 (2012)
- Lee, Wooseung, "Copy theory of movement and apparent ECM constructions", Linguistic Research, 31(1), pp.69~102 (2014)
- Ross, John Robert, "Constraints on variables in syntax", pp.1967
- Sells, Peter, "Interactions of negative polarity items in Korean", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 11, pp.724~737 (2006)
- Sohn, Ho-Min, "Korean grammar" (1996), Cambridge University Press
- Sohn, Keun-Won, "Negative polarity items, scope, and economy", pp.1995
- Sohn, Keun-Won, "On the types of Korean NPIs", Eneyenkwu, 9(3), pp.450~468 (2004)
- Sohn, Keun-Won, "What can slang NPIs tell us about the nature and typology of NPIs", Studies in Generative Grammar, 17(3), pp.271~292 (2007)
- Yeo, Seungju, "On the causee argument in Japanese and Korean analytic causative construction", Studies in Generative Grammar, 16(2), pp.231~248 (2006)
- Yeo, Seungju, "Some notes on resultatives in Korean", Studies in Generative Grammar, 16(4), pp.687~706 (2006)
