비정형절로부터의 부정극어 인허
NPI Licensing from Non-finite Clauses
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The current paper examines the long-distance licensing of Negative Polarity Items (NPIs) out of non-finite clauses, which are known as weak CP phases in Korean. In Russian, long-distance NPI licensing is also permitted, even when a negative element and an NPI span across a clause boundary. Such long-distance NPI licensing does not adhere to the Phase-Impenetrability Condition (PIC), which requires the locality of [+Neg] feature checking in finite clauses. To explain why long-distance NPI licensing is allowed in bi-clausal structures, the paper suggests that the checking interaction between the [+Neg] feature on the head of NegP and an NPI can occur across the weak CP phases of non-finite clauses marked by complementizers such as -ko, -ki, -key, -cikey, or -myen. Unlike Korean, English NPIs must adhere to the C-command condition, regardless of whether they are located in simplex or bi-clausal structures. Long-distance NPI licensing in Korean is permissible only when the NPI is located in the infinitival complement, which differs from English long-distance NPI licensing, where NPIs are licensed across both finite and non-finite clauses.
Abstract
The current paper examines the long-distance licensing of Negative Polarity Items (NPIs) out of non-finite clauses, which are known as weak CP phases in Korean. In Russian, long-distance NPI licensing is also permitted, even when a negative element and an NPI span across a clause boundary. Such long-distance NPI licensing does not adhere to the Phase-Impenetrability Condition (PIC), which requires the locality of [+Neg] feature checking in finite clauses. To explain why long-distance NPI licensing is allowed in bi-clausal structures, the paper suggests that the checking interaction between the [+Neg] feature on the head of NegP and an NPI can occur across the weak CP phases of non-finite clauses marked by complementizers such as -ko, -ki, -key, -cikey, or -myen. Unlike Korean, English NPIs must adhere to the C-command condition, regardless of whether they are located in simplex or bi-clausal structures. Long-distance NPI licensing in Korean is permissible only when the NPI is located in the infinitival complement, which differs from English long-distance NPI licensing, where NPIs are licensed across both finite and non-finite clauses.
참고문헌 (31)
- 구종남, "국어 부정극어의 허가 영역과 통사 구조의 해석", 어문연구, 72, pp.5~34 (2012)
- 김보경, "영어와 한국어 부정극어 비교 연구", 영미어문학, 140, pp.87~101 (2021)
- 김보경, "영어 부정극어 발화유형 비교 : 주어와 목적어 중심으로", 영미어문학, 152, pp.105~123 (2024)
- 김보라, "장거리 부정극어 허가 구문의 통사구조 : 러시아어와 마케도니아어를 중심으로", 언어와 언어학, 73, pp.55~70 (2016)
- 김설연, "한국어 부사 부정극어 ‘통’과 ‘영’에 대한 연구 : 한국어 교육의 관점에서", 언어학, 30(4), pp.41~62 (2022)
- 남승호, "한국어 부정극어의 유형과 그 허가조건", 언어학, 22, pp.217~243 (1998)
- 박소영, "‘-을 수 있다’ 양태구문의 통사구조와 부정극어 인허", 생성문법연구, 32(1), pp.75~96 (2022)
- 이두원, "한국어의 주어 NP의 통사구조에서 존칭자질 삼투", 언어과학연구, 103, pp.127~145 (2022)
- 이두원, "이차결과구문 다시보기 : 타동사 결과구문의 결손 pro 위치를 중심으로", 영어영문학 연구, 65(1), pp.185~216 (2023)
- 이두원, "의문사(구)의 장거리 일치와 부정극어의 장거리 인허", 언어학 연구, 68, pp.97~118 (2024)
- 정대식, "한국어의 부정극어 인허과정의 재검토", 국어학, 107, pp.297~323 (2023)
- 최진영, "부정극어 ‘더 이상’의 분포와 의미에 대하여", 언어학과, pp.1998
- 최진영, "부정극어 ‘더 이상’의 분포와 의미 –특히 부정함축술어와 관련하여-", 언어와 정보, 2(1), pp.42~78 (1998)
- 홍기선, "영어의 결과구문과 한국어의"게"구문", 언어, 36(4), pp.1143~1169 (2011)
- 홍민표, "부정극어와 의문문의 의미와 화용", 언어연구, 27(3), pp.557~579 (2010)
- Brown, S, "The syntax of negation in Russian : A minimalist approach" (1999), CSLI Publications
- Choe, H. S., "Restructuring parameter and complex predicates: A transformational approach", Doctor, pp.1988
- Choi, Y. S. ., "Korean resultative construction redux", The Journal of Studies in Language, 38(2), pp.169~187 (2022)
- Chomsky, N, "Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Chung, D. H, "NPI Types based on the trigger strength", Proceedings of the First International Conference on Cognitive Science (1997)
- Kang, Y., "The key constructions in Korean predicate : Head or a complementizer", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 9, pp.433~442 (2001)
- Kim, S., "Resultatives: English vs. Korean", Journal of Korean Linguistics, 7, pp.363~379 (1998)
- Kuno, S, "Negative polarity items in Korean and English", Paper in Korean Workshop at SOAS (1994)
- Ladusaw, W. A, "Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations", Doctor, pp.1979
- Landau, I., "Two routes of control : Evidence from case transmission in Russian", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 26, pp.877~924 (2008)
- Lee, S. -H, "Introducing arguments and case", Doctor, pp.2024
- Linebarger, M., "Negative polarity and grammatical representation", Linguistics and Philosophy, 10, pp.325~387 (1987)
- Progovac, L., "Negative polarity : Entailment and binding", Linguistics and Philosophy, 16, pp.149~180 (1987)
- "An economy theory of PRO" (2022)[URL]
- Sohn, H. M., "Korean grammar" (1996), Cambridge University Press
- Yeo, S., "Some notes on resultatives in Korean", Studies in Generative Grammar, 16(4), pp.687~706 (2006)