부정극어의 조각구문과 섬 제약 다시 보기
Fragments and Island Effects of NPI Redux
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
When extraction occurs from islands, such as complex NPs or adjunct clauses, a sentence becomes unacceptable. Plain fragments are acceptable because ellipsis can repair the island violation, but NPI(negative polarity item) fragments can not, as ellipsis do not resolve the island issue for NPIs. NPI fragments show a more pronounced island constraint effect compared to scrambled NPI constructions, as opposed to the plain fragment repair effect. The adverbial NPI ‘NP-pakkey’ in an adjunct clause is not licensed by higher clause negation so scrambling it to the sentence-initial position and forming a fragment violates the adjunct island constraint. Unlike the argument NPI ‘amw(N)to,’ ‘NP-pakkey’ functions as an adverbial in long-distance contexts, exhibiting full island constraint effects. Multiple NPIs, including those in the subject position, cannot be licensed from islands at long distances. Finally, the paper argues that the NPI ‘amw(N)to’ can be licensed with the adverbial conjunction '-ceney,' while the NPI ‘NP-pakkey’ cannot.
Abstract
When extraction occurs from islands, such as complex NPs or adjunct clauses, a sentence becomes unacceptable. Plain fragments are acceptable because ellipsis can repair the island violation, but NPI(negative polarity item) fragments can not, as ellipsis do not resolve the island issue for NPIs. NPI fragments show a more pronounced island constraint effect compared to scrambled NPI constructions, as opposed to the plain fragment repair effect. The adverbial NPI ‘NP-pakkey’ in an adjunct clause is not licensed by higher clause negation so scrambling it to the sentence-initial position and forming a fragment violates the adjunct island constraint. Unlike the argument NPI ‘amw(N)to,’ ‘NP-pakkey’ functions as an adverbial in long-distance contexts, exhibiting full island constraint effects. Multiple NPIs, including those in the subject position, cannot be licensed from islands at long distances. Finally, the paper argues that the NPI ‘amw(N)to’ can be licensed with the adverbial conjunction '-ceney,' while the NPI ‘NP-pakkey’ cannot.
참고문헌 (19)
- 남승호, "한국어 부정극어의 유형과 그 허가조건", 언어학, 22, pp.217~243 (1998)
- 박승윤, "‘밖에’의 문법화 현상", 언어, 22(1), pp.57~70 (1997)
- 이두원, "한국어 스트리핑 구문의 복합명사구 제약 효과", 언어과학, 28(1), pp.113~135 (2021)[DOI]
- 이두원, "의문사(구)의 장거리 일치와 부정극어의 장거리 인허", 언어학 연구, 72, pp.97~118 (2024)[DOI]
- 이두원, "보어절과 부가어절로부터의 부정극어 인허", 영어영문학 연구, 66(3), pp.227~256 (2024)[DOI]
- 이두원, "부정극어 ‘NP-밖에’의 장거리 인허", 현대문법연구, 123, pp.63~83 (2024)[DOI]
- Bae, S., "On the CMC Effect in Korean", Proceedings of the ELSOK-KGGC Joint Conference, pp.185~186 (2014)
- Hwang, J, "The Dual Nature of N-pakkey", Studies in Linguistics, 47, pp.101~124 (2018)[DOI]
- Kim. R, "On the Negativity of Negative Fragment Answers and Ellipsis Resolution", Studies in Generative Grammar, 23(3), pp.447~468 (2013)[DOI]
- Kuno, S, "Negative Polarity Items in Korean and English", Paper in Korean Workshop at SOAS (1994)
- Ladusaw. W. A., "Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations", Ph. D., pp.1979
- Lee, D. W, "Presence and Absence of the Complex NP Island Effects", Studies in Linguistics, 21, pp.255~276 (2012)
- Lee, D. W, "Island Effects and NCI Fragment Licensing", The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 22(2), pp.1~26 (2014)
- Lee, D. W, "Idiomatic Complement and Null pro Subject", Journal of Language Sciences, 24(1), pp.261~276 (2017)[DOI]
- Lee, J. S, "Some Remarks on NPI Licensing", Studies in Generative Grammar, 20(1), pp.251~275 (2010)
- Merchant, J, "Fragments and Ellipsis", Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, pp.661~738 (2004)
- Park, M. K, "Root vs. Embedded Clause Asymmetry in Korean and its Implications", Studies in Generative Grammar, 18(4), pp.769~783 (2008)
- Park, M. K, "On Amwuto ‘anyone’ and its Kin in Korean. Their Status and Licensing as a Fragment Answer", Studies in Generative Grammar, 23(3), pp.585~602 (2013)[DOI]
- Sohn, K. W, "Negative Polarity Items, Scope, and Economy", Ph. D., pp.1995