한국어 전달문의 혼합유형에 관한 몇 가지 관찰- 자유간접화법과 내포직접화법을 중심으로
Some observations on mixed reported speech in Korean: Focusing on free indirect speech and embedded direct speech
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Reported speech has been divided into direct and indirect speech. In direct speech, the deictic center and the sentence type of the original utterance are maintained, while in indirect speech, the deictic center shifts to the perspective of the reporter and the sentence is embedded by a verb-of-saying clause. On the other hand, there are mixed types: in one, the deictic center shifts to the reporter but the sentence is not embedded (free indirect speech), and in the other, the deictic center is maintained while the sentence is embedded by a verb-of-saying clause (which I call embedded direct speech). Although both types have some direct and indirect characteristics, embedded direct speech is more widely used than free indirect speech. I suggest that in Korean, attributive metarepresentations (that is, others’ thought or utterance such as reported speech) tend to be marked by sentence-final suffixes. Free indirect speech does not have such a marker even though it reports others’ thought or utterance. That is why free indirect speech is not widely used in Korean.
Abstract
Reported speech has been divided into direct and indirect speech. In direct speech, the deictic center and the sentence type of the original utterance are maintained, while in indirect speech, the deictic center shifts to the perspective of the reporter and the sentence is embedded by a verb-of-saying clause. On the other hand, there are mixed types: in one, the deictic center shifts to the reporter but the sentence is not embedded (free indirect speech), and in the other, the deictic center is maintained while the sentence is embedded by a verb-of-saying clause (which I call embedded direct speech). Although both types have some direct and indirect characteristics, embedded direct speech is more widely used than free indirect speech. I suggest that in Korean, attributive metarepresentations (that is, others’ thought or utterance such as reported speech) tend to be marked by sentence-final suffixes. Free indirect speech does not have such a marker even though it reports others’ thought or utterance. That is why free indirect speech is not widely used in Korean.
참고문헌 (35)
- 고영근, "우리말 문법론" (2018), 집문당
- 김용진, "신문 뉴스 인용문의 담화 기능 : 미국 신문의 9-11 사건 보도를 중심으로", 담화와 인지, 11(2), pp.19~42 (2004), 담화·인지언어학회
- Gustave Flaubert, "보봐리 夫人" (1972), 학원사
- Gustave Flaubert, "마담 보바리" (2000), 민음사
- 김흥수, "현대국어 심리동사 구문 연구" (1989), 탑 출판사
- 남기심, "표준국어문법론" (2011), 탑 출판사
- 노은주, "사적 술어의 인칭 제약에 대한 화용론적 연구", 언어, 43(1), pp.21~42 (2018), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 문숙영, "인용과 화시소의 전이", 國語學, (65), pp.219~249 (2012), 국어학회[DOI]
- 문숙영, "자유간접화법의 지표와 인용문의 해석적 사용", 한국어 의미학, 62, pp.101~132 (2018), 한국어의미학회
- 박나리, "‘-는 것이다’ 구문 연구 -문법기능과 담화기능 그리고 화자의 담화전략의 상관성을 중심으로-", 國語學, (65), pp.251~279 (2012), 국어학회[DOI]
- 박선희, "자유간접화법의 불한 번역에서 다음성 재현에 관한 연구", 번역학연구, 12(3), pp.55~82 (2011), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 박선희, "문학 번역에서 자유간접화법, 어떻게 번역할 것인가?", 번역학연구, 16(5), pp.39~60 (2015), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 박지순, "학술 논문의 인용문 연구: 국어학 학술 논문 텍스트를 중심으로", 담화와 인지, 25(1), pp.81~100 (2018), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
- Gustave Flaubert, "보봐리 夫人" (1971), 정음사
- 이인화, "내가 누구인지 말할 수 있는 자는 누구인가" (1992), 세계사
- 이창수, "동일 원문 한영 소설 번역문 간 화법 번역 차이 연구", 번역학연구, 17(5), pp.233~250 (2016), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 조의연, "최대의 적합성으로 본 자유직접화법: <엘리베이터에 낀 그 남자는 어떻게 되었나>를 중심으로", 통번역학연구, 16(1), pp.177~203 (2012), 통번역연구소
- 채숙희, "현대 한국어 인용 구문 연구" (2013), 태학사
- 한강, "채식주의자" (2007), 창비
- Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, "Semi-direct speech: Manambu and beyond", Language Sciences, 30(4), pp.383~422 (2008), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Blass, Regina, "Relevance relations in discourse: A study with special reference to Sissala" (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Brown, Dan, "The Da Vinci code" (2003), Penguin Random House
- Flaubert, Gustave, "Madame Bovary" (1971), Garnier Frères
- Fludernik, Monika, "The fictions of language and the languages of fiction: The linguistic representation of speech and consciousness" (1993), Routledge
- Lee, Chungmin, "Cases for psychological verbs in Korean", Korean Journal of Linguistics, 1(1), pp.256~296 (1976)
- Noh, Eun-Ju, "Metarepresentation: A relevance theory approach" (2000), John Benjamins
- Quirk, Randolph, "A comprehensive grammar of the English language" (1985), Longman
- "King Lear"[URL]
- 한강, "The vegetarian" (2015), Hogarth
- Sohn, Ho-Min, "The Korean language" (1999), Cambridge University Press
- Swan, Michael, "Oxford English grammar course: Advanced" (2015), Oxford University Press
- Uchida, Seiji, "Metarepresentational phenomena in Japanese and Korean", Memoirs of Nara University, 46, pp.1~23 (2018)
- Deirdre Wilson, "Discourse, coherence and relevance: A reply to Rachel Giora", Journal of Pragmatics, 29(1), pp.57~74 (1998), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Wilson, Deirdre, "Metarepresentations", pp.411~448 (2000), Oxford University Press
- Yang, In-Seok, "Korean syntax: Case markers, delimiters, complementation, and relativization", Doctoral, pp.1972