보어 유형의 의미와 분포: 명제태도 술어와의 관계를 중심으로
The Types of Complements: A Study on their Meaning and Distribution based on the Relation with the Attitude Predicates
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper analyzes discourse properties of 5 complement types in Korean. To this end, we first choose 4 types of attitude predicates with respect to the way in which the content of the complement is updated to the common ground. Given this, it is discussed why a certain type of complement is compatible only with limited types of attitude predicates. Especially, we propose that unlike English where the way of updating the common ground is mainly attributable to the attitude predicate types, each complement type in Korean conveys specific information regarding the common ground updating, and thus its distribution is determined by the interaction between the selectional properties of the attitude predicates and the context updating nature of each complement type. In this line of reasoning, we put forth a way to explain the distributions of the completement types in Korean. Accordingly, it is also discussed (i) when the factivity of the content in the complement should arise, (ii) why a certain completement type can be used only when their content amounts to a new information, while the other complement type requires that its content should be directly imposed to the common ground, (iii) why some of these complement types can be used only in a very restrictive environment while some other types exhibit a relatively free distribution, and so on.
Abstract
This paper analyzes discourse properties of 5 complement types in Korean. To this end, we first choose 4 types of attitude predicates with respect to the way in which the content of the complement is updated to the common ground. Given this, it is discussed why a certain type of complement is compatible only with limited types of attitude predicates. Especially, we propose that unlike English where the way of updating the common ground is mainly attributable to the attitude predicate types, each complement type in Korean conveys specific information regarding the common ground updating, and thus its distribution is determined by the interaction between the selectional properties of the attitude predicates and the context updating nature of each complement type. In this line of reasoning, we put forth a way to explain the distributions of the completement types in Korean. Accordingly, it is also discussed (i) when the factivity of the content in the complement should arise, (ii) why a certain completement type can be used only when their content amounts to a new information, while the other complement type requires that its content should be directly imposed to the common ground, (iii) why some of these complement types can be used only in a very restrictive environment while some other types exhibit a relatively free distribution, and so on.
참고문헌 (44)
- Abrusán, Márta, "Presuppositional and negative islands : A semantic account", Natural Language Semantics, 19(3), pp.257~321 (2011)
- Abusch, Dorit, "Presupposition Triggering from Alternatives", Journal of Semantics, 27, pp.37~80 (2010)
- Anand, Pranav, "Epistemics and attitudes", Semantics and Pragmatics, 6, pp.1~59 (2013)
- Anand, Pranav, "The Art and Craft of Semantics: A Festschrift for Irene Heim", pp.69~90 (2014), MIT
- AnderBois, Scott, "Semantics and Pragmatics of(not-)at-issueness in Yucatec Maya attitude reports", Semantics and Pragmatics, 9, pp.1~55 (2016)
- Bhatt, Rajsh, "Long distance agreement in Hindi-Urdu", Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 23, pp.757~807 (2005)
- Balza. Irene, "On the functional vs. lexical nature of restructuring heads", Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics, 1, pp.71~110 (2012)
- Bogal-Allbritten, Elizabeth, "Nominalized clauses and reference to propositional content", Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung (SuB), 21, pp.215~232 (2017)
- Caplan, Spencer, "What usage can tell us about grammar : Embedded verb second in Scandinavian", Glossa : a journal of general linguistics, 4(1), pp.1~37 (2019)
- Cardinaletti, Anna, "Clitic positions and restructuring in Italian", Linguistic Inquiry, 35, pp.519~557 (2004)
- Farkas, F. Donka, "On reacting to assertions and polar questions", Journal of Semantics, 27, pp.81~118 (2010)
- Grano, Thomas, "Control and restructuring" (2015), Oxford University Press
- Gunlogson, Christine, "A question of commitment", Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 22, pp.101~136 (2008)
- Hacquard, Valentine, "Aspects of modality", Ph.D., pp.2006
- 한정한, "전제 개념과 ‘-음’ 내포절", Journal of korean Culture, 44, pp.7~36 (2019), 한국언어문화학술확산연구소[DOI]
- Heim, Irene, "Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung", pp.487~535 (1991), De Gruyter
- 허세문, "한국어 필수 통제 구문 연구 -완전", 부분 통제 구문을 중심으로-, 서울대학교, 2014
- 허세문, "약속문의 내포 불가능성에 대한 의미론적 제안", 언어와 정보, 20(2), pp.27~56 (2016), 한국언어정보학회
- 허세문, "재구조화를 통한 ‘-고 싶-’ 구문 분석에 대한 소고", 언어와 정보, 27(1), pp.37~58 (2023), 한국언어정보학회
- Hoe, Semoon, "Lexical restructuring of attitude verbs and its hierarchical restriction", Proceedings of Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics, 11, Department of Linguistics, MIT
- 허세문, "사실성 전제와 보문의 특성에 대한 새로운 관점", 國語學, (101), pp.95~150 (2022), 국어학회[DOI]
- 허세문, "보어 유형과 (비-)사실성: 사실성 전제, 한정성, 섬제약을 중심으로", 언어, 47(1), pp.129~167 (2022), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- Ippolito, Michela, "Subjunctive Conditionals" (2013), MIT Press
- Nominative, "Accusative case alternation in the Korean ‘Siph-ta’ construction", Jung, Hyun-Keong, 2011, Coyote Papers 18
- 권재일, "현대국어의 {기}-명사화 내포문 연구", 한글, 171, pp.45~63 (1981)
- 이정민, "태도 동사 ‘알다’의 사실성 교체-한국어와 그 밖의 알타이 제어의 특성", 國語學, (96), pp.3~58 (2020), 국어학회[DOI]
- Murray, Sarah, "Varieties of update", Semantics and Pragmatics, 7, pp.1~53 (2014)
- 남기심, "국어문법의 탐구 1", pp.133~254 (1996), 태학사
- Pak Miok, "Agreement and the Subjects of Jussive Clauses in Korean", Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, 37 (2007)
- Park, Jong Un, "Clause structure and null subjects: Referential dependencies in Korean", Doctoral, pp.2011
- Theoretical and Empirical studies of Reference and Anaphora, "Percus, Orin", Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, 52~73, pp.Report No. 15320052 (2006)
- Portner, Paul, "Mood and contextual commitment", Proceedings of SALT, 22, pp.461~487 (2012)
- Rizzi, Luigi, "Recent transformational studies in European languages", pp.113~158 (1978), MIT Press
- Sauerland, Uli, "Sentence and Context: Language, context, and cognition", pp.581~600 (2008), de Gruyter
- Schlenker, Philippe, "Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2003", pp.269~309 (2005), Benjamins
- 심상완, "한국어의 접속법 보문소 ‘-기’에 대한 연구", 어학연구, 31, pp.55~85 (1995)
- Simons Mandy, "The best question : Explaining the projection behavior of factive", Discourse Processes, 54, pp.187~206 (2017)
- Simons Mandy, "What projects and why", Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT), 20, pp.309~327 (2011)
- Singh, Raj, "Maximize Presupposition! and local contexts", Natural Language Semantics, 19, pp.149~168 (2011)
- Sisovics, Milena, "Embedded Jussives as Instances of Control", Ph.D., pp.2018
- Stalnaker, Robert, "Semantics and Philosophy", pp.197~213 (1974), New York University Press
- Stalnaker, Robert, "Syntax and Semantics, vol. 9", pp.315~322 (1978), Academic Press
- Wurmbrand, Suzi, "Infinitives: Restructuring and Clause structure" (2000), Mouton de Gruyter
- Eun-JungYoo, "Auxiliary Verbs and Structural Case Assignment in Korean", 어학연구, 38(4), pp.1009~1036 (2002), 언어교육원