요한복음 5:19-30 예수 담화의 요한식 역교차 구조와 문체 연구
A Study on the Johannine Chiastic Structure and Its Styles in John 5:19-30
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
John was not written in the way of modern logic. It means that the structures and its literary styles in John cannot be properly detected, if we pay our attention simply to the modern way of reading/writing-skills when we read John, ignoring its own way of network of expressions different modern ones in our days. In John, there are so many repetitions or repetitive expressions. Repetitions are not the matter of producing literary repetition that simply emphasizes certain idea or expression twice or thrice, but rather they are the typical Johannine style of parallelisms or chiasms causing specific, relational meaning-network. This type of combined, repetitive phenomenon in John is so significant for the readers to understand the Johannine documents. John 5:19-30, one of Jesus’ discourse parts in John 5, was designed with one overall chiastic structure, A (v. 19-20) – B (vs. 21-25) – B' (vs. 26-29) – A' (v. 30), with so many complex-parallel features in style. As we consider so webbed or interwoven parallel features throughout the text, it is so logical that we may presume that the text is also written with the parallel (or chiastic) type of overall structure reflecting its own parallel features that provides the reader calculable repetitive effect with emphasis on certain ideas and expressions. Johannine style such as chiastic design here needs to be studied in terms of how this type of meaning-network could lead the readers to repetitively be impressed, in the Johannine way, by ideas that the text tells about. Thus, we cannot deal with it only with our manner of reading in modern days.
Abstract
John was not written in the way of modern logic. It means that the structures and its literary styles in John cannot be properly detected, if we pay our attention simply to the modern way of reading/writing-skills when we read John, ignoring its own way of network of expressions different modern ones in our days. In John, there are so many repetitions or repetitive expressions. Repetitions are not the matter of producing literary repetition that simply emphasizes certain idea or expression twice or thrice, but rather they are the typical Johannine style of parallelisms or chiasms causing specific, relational meaning-network. This type of combined, repetitive phenomenon in John is so significant for the readers to understand the Johannine documents. John 5:19-30, one of Jesus’ discourse parts in John 5, was designed with one overall chiastic structure, A (v. 19-20) – B (vs. 21-25) – B' (vs. 26-29) – A' (v. 30), with so many complex-parallel features in style. As we consider so webbed or interwoven parallel features throughout the text, it is so logical that we may presume that the text is also written with the parallel (or chiastic) type of overall structure reflecting its own parallel features that provides the reader calculable repetitive effect with emphasis on certain ideas and expressions. Johannine style such as chiastic design here needs to be studied in terms of how this type of meaning-network could lead the readers to repetitively be impressed, in the Johannine way, by ideas that the text tells about. Thus, we cannot deal with it only with our manner of reading in modern days.
참고문헌 (44)
- A. Vanhoye, "La Composition de Jean 5:19-30, in Melanges Bibliques en homage au R.P. Beda Rigaux", pp.259~274 (1970), Duculot
- Andreas J.Ko¨sterberger, "John:Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament", pp.189~ (2004), Baker Academic
- Andreas J. Kosterberger, "The Word, the Christ, the Son of God: A Theology of John's Gospel and Letters", pp.130~ (2009)
- Herman Ridderbos, "The Gospel of John: ATheological Commentary", pp.201~202 (1997), Grand Rapids
- Charles H.Talbert, "Reading John:ALiterary and Theological Commentary on the Fourth Gospel and the Johannine Epistles", pp.124~25 (1992), SPCK
- Craig S.Keener, "The Gospel of John:A Commentary V.1", pp.111~13 (2003), Hendrickson
- Dennis L. Stamps, "The Johannine Writings, in Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period 330 B.C. ‒ A.D. 400", pp.618~619 (1997), Brill
- Ernst Haenchen, "John 1:A Commentary on the Gospel of John Chapters 1-6", pp.251~252 (1980), Fortress Press
- Fancis J.Moloney, "The Johannine Son of Man", pp.73~ (1978), Liberia Ateneo Salesiano
- "Mary, the 'Woman' and the ‘Mother' John: A Response"[URL]
- Frederic Louis Godet, "Commentary on John's Gospel", pp.469~482 (1978), Kregel
- George R. Beasley-Murray, "John, WBC 36 (Waco: Word Books, 1987), 77; D.A. Carson, The Gospel According to John", pp.259~ (1991), InterVarsity Press
- Gerald L. Borchert, "John 1-11: The New American Commentary, An Exegetical and Theological Exposition of Holy Scripture", pp.240~242 (1996), Holman Publishers
- Gilbert Van Belle, "Theory of Repetitions and Variations in the Fourth Gospel: A Neglected Field of Research?, in Repetitions and Variations in the Fourth Gospel: Style, Text, Interpretation", pp.26~27 (2009), Uitgeverij Peeters
- Johannnes Beutler, S.J., "The Structure of John 6, in Critical Readings of John 6", pp.115~127 (1997), Brill
- John Ashton, "Understanding the Fourth Gospel", pp.357~363 (1991), Clarendon Press
- Jorome H.Neyrey, "The Gospel of John in Cultural and Rhetorical Perspective", pp.178~179 (2009), Eerdmans
- L.Scott Kellum, "Unity of the Farewell Discourse:The Literary Integrity of John 13.31-16.33", pp.91~ (1997), Sheffield Academic Press
- Leon Morris, "The Gospel According to John: The English Text With Introduction, Exposition and Notes", pp.311~335 (1971), Eerdmans
- "Notes", pp.219~ (1966), The Anchor Bible
- P. Kent Hughes, "John: That You May Believe", pp.164~167 (1999), Crossway
- Patrick Chatelion Counet, "John, A Postmodern Gospel Introduction to Deconstructive Exegesis Applied to the Fourth Gospel" (2000), Brill
- R. Alan Culpepper, "John 6: Current Research in Retrospect", pp.251~252, Critical Readings
- R.Kysar, "Voyages with John:Charting the Fourth Gospel", pp.53~ (2005), Baylor Uni. Press
- Raymond Brown, "The Gospel According to John I-XII: Introduction, Translation, and", ~
- Robert T.Fortna, "The Fourth Gospel and Its Predecessor:From Narrative Source to Present Gospel" (2004), T.& T.Clark
- Robert. T. Fortna, "The Gospel of Signs: A Reconstruction of the Narrative Source"
- Rodney A.Whitacre, "John", pp.130~132 (1999), InterVarsity Press
- Rudolf Bultmann, "The Gospel of John:A Commentary", pp.260~261 (1971), The Westminster Press
- Sang-Hoon Kim, "Complex Parallelisms in 1 John 1:1-4", Chongshin Theological Journal, 9, pp.223~242 (2004)
- Sang-Hoon Kim, "Complex Parallelisms in 1 John 1:5-2:2", Chongshin Theological Journal, 11(1), pp.46~67 (2006)
- Sang-Hoon Kim, "Complex Parallelisms in 1 John 2:3-11", Chongshin Theological Journal, 13(1), pp.66~91 (2008)
- Sang-Hoon Kim, "Johannine Complex Parallelisms in 1 John 2:29-3:10", Chongshin Theological Journal, 15, pp.125~128 (2010)
- Stephen H. Levinsohn, "A Holistic Approach to the Argument Structure of Romans 6, 7. 4. 2011 ISBL, Paul and Pauline Literature Section 4-43", ~ (2011)
- Stephen H.Levinsohn, "Discourse Features of New Testament Greek:A Coursebook on the Information Structure of New Testament Greek", pp.295~ (2000), SIL International
- Tom Thatcher, "Riddles and the Unity of the Discourses, in Repetitions and Variations", pp.371~
- "Underlying the Fourth Gospel", pp.2~ (1970), Cambridge Univ. Press
- Urban C. von Wahlde, "Studying the Composition of the Gospel and Letters of John: Can We Get Beyond Subjectivity?, in SBL Johannine Literature Section 6-9" (2011)
- Witherington III, "John's Wisdom:A Commentary on the fourth Gospel", pp.143~ (1995), Westminster John Knox Press
- Witherington, "John's Wisdom, 143; Morris, The Gospel According to John", pp.321~322
- X. Leon-Dufour, "Le mystere du pain de vie (Jean VI)", RSR, 46, pp.481~523 (1958)
- 김문현, "요한복음의 인물연구 역사와 방법론 고찰", 신약논단, 15(3), pp.769~804 (2008), 한국신약학회
- 김상훈, "요한복음 프롤로그와 요한일서 서문의 비교 연구", 신약연구, 9(3), pp.369~408 (2010), 한국복음주의신약학회
- 정창욱, "요한복음에 사용된 ‘믿다’ 동사 용법의 독특성 : 요한복음 주해를 위한 함의", 신약논단, 16(1), pp.67~104 (2009), 한국신약학회