요한복음 프롤로그와 요한일서 서문의 비교 연구
A Comparative Study on the Prologue of John and the Preface of 1 John in Terms of Their Parallel Features
1
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This type of comparative studies on the Prologue of John and the Preface of 1 John in terms of stylistic and structural analysis has not been properly paid attention to. Scholars have paid heed just to the surface level of comparison such as vocabularies and theological terms (or ideas), although not so few Johannine scholars have put much their focuses on studies of the Prologue’s structure. The value of the comparative study of both structures and styles of the Prologue and the Preface lies in 1) probably providing certain solution to the issue of authorship, 2) giving certain light upon the other part of study interactively or inter-relationally, if we can discern the specific authorial type of linguistic pattern in use, such as complex parallelism, based on the close connectivity between the Prologue and the Preface, 3)promoting the further continuous studies of the other Johannine texts besides the Prologue and the preface, grounded on the detected, specific patterns of structure or style. In this comparative study, the Prologue is determined to have certain resembled phenomena, in style and structure, with the Preface that shows the Johannine complex parallelisms, designing a stunning,poetic style of structure. Its complex chiastic structure of the Prologue,A(1-2)-B1(3-5)-C(6-8)-B2(9-11)-X(12-13)-B´2(14)-C´(15)-B´1(16-17)-A´(18), demonstrates convincingly that the text should not be interpreted simply in logical or successive order, but in complex-chiastic or interrelational order. V. 1 needs to be interpreted in relation to v. 18,while vs. 3-5 in relation both to vs. 9-11 and vs. 16-17, v. 6-8 in relation to v. 15, and v. 14 in relation both to vs. 16-17 (or including v. 18) and to vs. 9-11, simultaneously.
Abstract
This type of comparative studies on the Prologue of John and the Preface of 1 John in terms of stylistic and structural analysis has not been properly paid attention to. Scholars have paid heed just to the surface level of comparison such as vocabularies and theological terms (or ideas), although not so few Johannine scholars have put much their focuses on studies of the Prologue’s structure. The value of the comparative study of both structures and styles of the Prologue and the Preface lies in 1) probably providing certain solution to the issue of authorship, 2) giving certain light upon the other part of study interactively or inter-relationally, if we can discern the specific authorial type of linguistic pattern in use, such as complex parallelism, based on the close connectivity between the Prologue and the Preface, 3)promoting the further continuous studies of the other Johannine texts besides the Prologue and the preface, grounded on the detected, specific patterns of structure or style. In this comparative study, the Prologue is determined to have certain resembled phenomena, in style and structure, with the Preface that shows the Johannine complex parallelisms, designing a stunning,poetic style of structure. Its complex chiastic structure of the Prologue,A(1-2)-B1(3-5)-C(6-8)-B2(9-11)-X(12-13)-B´2(14)-C´(15)-B´1(16-17)-A´(18), demonstrates convincingly that the text should not be interpreted simply in logical or successive order, but in complex-chiastic or interrelational order. V. 1 needs to be interpreted in relation to v. 18,while vs. 3-5 in relation both to vs. 9-11 and vs. 16-17, v. 6-8 in relation to v. 15, and v. 14 in relation both to vs. 16-17 (or including v. 18) and to vs. 9-11, simultaneously.
참고문헌 (42)
- Andreas J. Kostenberger, "John", pp.20~ (2004), Baker Academic
- Andreas J. Ko¨stenberger, "Encountering John: The Gospel in Historical, Literary, and Theological Perspective", pp.21~23 (1999), Baker Books
- Byung-Chan Go, "`Belief' and `Logos' in the Prologue of the Gospel of John: An Analysis of Complex Parallelism", 박사, pp.2009
- Craig S. Keener, "The Gospel of John: A Commentary", pp.364~426 (2003), Hendrickson
- Charles H. Talbert, "Reading John: A Literary and Theological Commentary on the fourth Gospel and the Johannine Epistles", pp.14~ (1992), Crossroad
- Colin G. Kruse, "The Gospel According to John: An Introduction and Commentary", pp.58~61 (2003), Eerdmans
- D.A. Carson, "The Gospel According to John", pp.113~ (1991), Inter-Varsity Press
- Herman N. Ridderbos, "The Gospel According to John: A Theological Commentary", pp.19~ (1997), Eerdmans
- Hartmut Gese, "Der Johannesprolog. in: Zur biblicshen Theologie, Alttestamentliche Vorta¨rge", pp.152~201 (1977), Kaiser Verlag
- Herman C. Waetjen, "The Gospel of the Beloved Disciple", pp.81~87 (2005), T & T Clark
- K.E. Bailey, "Poet & Peasant and through Peasant Eyes: A Literary-Cultural Approach to the Parables of Luke", pp.59~ (1983), Eerdmans
- M.E. Boismard, "St John's Prologue", pp.5~ (1957), Blackfriars
- Leon Morris, "The Gospel According to John: The English Text with Introduction, Exposition and Notes", pp.65~ (1977), Eerdmans
- Gilbert Van Belle, "Theory of Repetitions and Variations in the Fourth Gospel: A Neglected Field of Research?. in: Repetitions and Variations in the Fourth Gospel: Style, Text, Interpretation", pp.26~ (2009), Uitgeverij Peeters
- Gary M. Burge, "John: The NIV Application Commentary, From Biblical Text to Contemporary Life", pp.53~54 (2000), Zondervan
- Gunnar Östenstad, "Patterns of Redemption in the Fourth Gospel: An Experiment in Structural Analysis", pp.85~93 (1998), The Edwin Mellen Press
- Gerald L. Borchert, "John 1-11" (1996), Broadman & Holman
- Peder Borgen, "Observatioins on the Targumic Character of the Prologue of John", NTS, 16, pp.288~295 (1970)
- Peter F. Ellis, "The Genius of John: A Composition-Critical Commentary on the Fourth Gospel" (1984), Liturgical
- Peter F. Ellis, "Inclusion, Chiasm, and the Division of the Fourth Gospel", SVTQ, 43, pp.269~338 (1999)
- Steven Richard Scott, "Parallel Chiasms in the Introduction and Conclusion of John", pp.1~10 (2010), Presented in the SBL International Meeting at Turtu
- Sang-Hoon Kim, "Complex Parallelisms in 1John 1:1-4", CTJ, 12, pp.223~242 (2004)
- Stephen S. Smalley, "1, 2, 3 John", pp.4~ (1984), Word Books
- Sang-Hoon Kim, "Complex Parallelisms in 1 John 1:5-2:2", Chongshin Theological Journal, 11, pp.46~67 (2006)
- Sang-Hoon Kim, "Complex Parallelisms in 1 John 2:3-11", Chongshin Theological Journal, 13(1), pp.66~91 (2008)
- Sang-Hoon Kim, "Johannine Complex Parallelisms in 1 John 2:29-3:10", Chongshin Theological Journal, 18(1), pp.113~142 (2010)
- Stephen Voorwinde, "Jesus' Emotions in the Fourth Gospel: Human or Divine?", pp.67~72 (2005), T & T Clark
- Thomas Whitelaw, "Commentary on John", pp.3~ (1993), Kregel
- Thomas L. Brodie, "The Gospel According to John: A Literary and Theological Commentary", pp.76~ (1993), Oxford University Press
- M. Black, "An Aramaic Approach to the Gospel and Acts" (1928), Clarendo Press
- Nigel Turner, "A Grammar of New Testament Greek: Style", pp.64~79 (1976), T & T Clark
- N.W. Lund, "The Influence of Chiasmusupon the Structure of the Gospels", ATR, 8, pp.27~48 (1931)
- J.P. Fokkelman, "Reading Biblical Poetry: An Introduction Guide", pp.25~ (2001), WJK
- J.W. Pryor, "John: Evangelist of the Covenant People", pp.9~10 (1992), InterVarsity
- Jerome H Neyrey, S.J., "The Gospel of John", pp.38~ (2007), Cambridge University Press
- Jeff Staley, "The Structure of John's Prologue: Its Implications for the Gospel' Narrative Structure", CBQ, 48, pp.241~264 (1986)
- John J. Gerhard, "The Literary Unity and Compositional methods of the Gospel of John", 박사, pp.1975
- John Ronning, "The Jewish Targums and John's Logos Theology" (2010), Hendrickson
- Raymond E. Brown, "The Epistles of John", pp.176~177 (1982), The Anchor Bible
- Raymond E. Brown, "The Gospel According to John I-XII: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary", pp.3~4 (1966), The Anchor Bible
- R. Kent Hughes, "John: That You May Believe", pp.16~ (1999), Crossway Books
- Rudolf Bultmann, "The Gospel of John: A Commentary" (1971), Westminster press