Long-distance Anaphor Binding in Lower Subject Positions
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Unlike the anaphor in the embedded non-subject position, the anaphor in the embedded subject position cannot be long-distance bound to the higher object or dative argument. The pronoun in the embedded subject position can be freely coindexed with any higher arguments such as a subject, object or dative argument across the clause boundary. On the other hand, the embedded null subject position in Korean, which is pro, can alternate with the anaphor only when the controller is a higher subject. In Korean, control is triggered by factors such as the semantics of the controlling predicate. Not only pro but also other lexical NP can appear in the null argument position. The long-distance anaphor caki ‘self’ can only be substituted for an embedded controlled null subject in the cases of the higher subject controller. The higher dative topichood doesn’t make an impact on the interpretation of the anaphor. More important, the subject of the secondary predicates of the resultative sentence, the imperative construction and the lower non-finite clause of seltukha ‘persuade’ sentences is typically a null argument (i.e., pro), which can freely alternate with the pronoun coindexed with the higher controller or an arbitrary pronoun, but not with the anaphor. As a result, it follows that a subject is the strongest trigger for anaphor binding of the lower subject across the clause boundary.
Abstract
Unlike the anaphor in the embedded non-subject position, the anaphor in the embedded subject position cannot be long-distance bound to the higher object or dative argument. The pronoun in the embedded subject position can be freely coindexed with any higher arguments such as a subject, object or dative argument across the clause boundary. On the other hand, the embedded null subject position in Korean, which is pro, can alternate with the anaphor only when the controller is a higher subject. In Korean, control is triggered by factors such as the semantics of the controlling predicate. Not only pro but also other lexical NP can appear in the null argument position. The long-distance anaphor caki ‘self’ can only be substituted for an embedded controlled null subject in the cases of the higher subject controller. The higher dative topichood doesn’t make an impact on the interpretation of the anaphor. More important, the subject of the secondary predicates of the resultative sentence, the imperative construction and the lower non-finite clause of seltukha ‘persuade’ sentences is typically a null argument (i.e., pro), which can freely alternate with the pronoun coindexed with the higher controller or an arbitrary pronoun, but not with the anaphor. As a result, it follows that a subject is the strongest trigger for anaphor binding of the lower subject across the clause boundary.
참고문헌 (31)
- Ahn. H. -D., "A Study of Fragmental Utterance: With Reference to Eglish and Korean" (2012), Hankukmunhwasa
- 안희돈, "On the Absence of CP Ellipsis in English and Korean", 언어, 34(2), pp.267~281 (2009), 한국언어학회
- Borer, H., "Anaphoric AGR, In The Null Subject Parameter", pp.69~109 (1989)
- Cho, S. -W, "The Syntactic and Semantic Ambiguity of Caki ‘self’ in Korean", Journal of the International Circle of Korean Linguistics, 13, pp.149~166 (2006)
- 조숙환, "한국어 생략적 목적어의 해석과 역동적 심성공간이론", 언어학 연구, 26(26), pp.241~261 (2013), 한국중원언어학회
- Choe, H.-S., "On (Backward) Object Control in Korean", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 11, pp.373~386 (2006)
- Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Backwoard Control in Korean and Japanese, "Cormack, A.", UCLWPL, 57~83, pp.University College of London Working Papers in Linguistics 16 (2004)
- Hornstein, N., "Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal" (2001), Blackwell Publishers
- 정은경, "사역형의 통사적 분석", 언어, 27(4), pp.641~659 (2002), 한국언어학회
- Kim, J.-B., "Constraints on formation of Korean and English resultative constructions", NELS, 29, pp.137~151 (1999)
- Kim, S.-H., "On the Distribution and Interpretation of pro", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 5, pp.509~522 (1993)
- 김원호, "한국어의 재귀대명사: 형태와 기능", 언어과학, 20(1), pp.25~44 (2013), 한국언어과학회
- Kuno, S., "Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy" (1987), The University of Chicago Press
- 이두원, "Two Kinds of Causee in the Periphrastic Causative: ACC and DAT Causees", 언어과학, 14(2), pp.217~238 (2007), 한국언어과학회
- 이두원, "Multiple Case Marking and Null Argument Phenomena", 언어, 37(3), pp.659~678 (2012), 한국언어학회
- 이혜란, "Property of the Jussive Head in Korean Jussives", 생성문법연구, 22(2), pp.263~302 (2012), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Madigan, S, "Obligatory Split Control into Exhortative Complements", Linguistic Inquiry, 39(3), pp.493~502 (2008)
- Pak, M., "Jussive Clauses and Agreement of Sentence Final Particles in Korean", pp.295~306 (2006), CSLI Publications
- Pak, M., "Agreement in Promissive, Imperative, and Exhortative Clauses", Korean Linguistics, 14, pp.157~175 (2008)
- 박종언, "On Controlled Subjects in Jussive Complements in Korean", 언어, 36(2), pp.367~393 (2011), 한국언어학회
- Park, D.-W., "Multiple Identities of Morpheme ‘-key’ and Resultative Construction in Korean", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 14, pp.425~442 (2012)
- Radford, A., "Analysing English Sentences: A Minimal Approach" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Riemsdijk, H., "Introduction to the Theory of Grammar" (1986), The MIT Press
- Uchibori, A., "The Syntax of Subjunctive Complements: Evidence from Japanese", 박사, pp.2000
- Wechsler, S., "Resultatives under the ‘event-argument homomorphism’ model of telicity, In The Syntax of Aspect: Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation" (2005), Oxford University Press
- Williams, E., "Predication", Linguistic Inquiry, 11, pp.203~238 (1980)
- Yang. D.-W., "On the Integrity of Control Theory", NELS, 15, pp.389~408 (1985)
- 여승주, "Some Notes on Resultatives in Korean", 생성문법연구, 16(4), pp.717~736 (2006), 한국생성문법학회
- 임창국, "한국어 이차술어 구문의 통사", 언어, 31(1), pp.125~141 (2006), 한국언어학회
- Yoon. J, "Raising of Mayor Arguments in Korean and Japanese", Natural Language and Linguistics Theory, 25, pp.615~653 (2007)