본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

조선 후기 학창의 연구

A Study on Hakchangui in the Late Joseon Dynasty

김혜란|홍나영
한복문화학회 (The Society of Korean Traditional Costume)|2022.09|한복문화 (Journal of Korean Traditional Costume)|제25권 제3호|pp. 5-22

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

중단창의학창의Changui일상예복괘자Daily attireHakchanguiInner robeQueja
주제분류의상

초록

Hakchangui is an article of clothing derived from Taoism and called Hakchang. Based on the relevance to Hakchang in the Ming dynasty, this study examines the public reaction to, function, and form of Hakchangui in the 17th and 18th century Joseon Dynasty and attempts to understand the change of Hakchangui in the 19th century. In the Ming Dynasty, Hakchangui was worn by the Taoists, the scholars who escaped power and lived a life of the world and the people in general. Jikryeong has no closures at the center front and no slits at the sides or back. In the 17th and 18th centuries, Hakchangui of the Joseon Dynasty was worn as a daily attire of the Scholar-officials. It is similar to the Hakchang of the Ming Dynasty in that it has wide sleeves, collars, sleeves, and hemlines. However, it is a combined shape of a cloak and differs in composition, shape, collars, and front closure. In the 19th century, Hakchangui was a with a black line on the Changui and had a back slit in the form of Jikryonggyoim, whose collar is straight and the hem crossed with back slits. Hakchangui was inner under official attire in the early 19th century, and it is estimated that it began to be used at the end of the 18th century when the policy of changing the Changui worn as an inner robe of court uniform to a white unlined garment worn as a base when wearing a uniform was implemented. The sleeveless Queja type of Hakchangui has been worn since the 17th century, and it lasted until the 19th century and was worn as innerwear like the Jikryonggyoim type of Hakchangui. Based on the Hakchang system of the Ming Dynasty in the 17th and 18th centuries, Hakchangui in the late Joseon Dynasty showed a small portion of its composition characteristics. Around the 19th century, it was separated from Hakchang in the Ming Dynasty and developed into a unique style of Joseon.

Abstract

Hakchangui is an article of clothing derived from Taoism and called Hakchang. Based on the relevance to Hakchang in the Ming dynasty, this study examines the public reaction to, function, and form of Hakchangui in the 17th and 18th century Joseon Dynasty and attempts to understand the change of Hakchangui in the 19th century. In the Ming Dynasty, Hakchangui was worn by the Taoists, the scholars who escaped power and lived a life of the world and the people in general. Jikryeong has no closures at the center front and no slits at the sides or back. In the 17th and 18th centuries, Hakchangui of the Joseon Dynasty was worn as a daily attire of the Scholar-officials. It is similar to the Hakchang of the Ming Dynasty in that it has wide sleeves, collars, sleeves, and hemlines. However, it is a combined shape of a cloak and differs in composition, shape, collars, and front closure. In the 19th century, Hakchangui was a with a black line on the Changui and had a back slit in the form of Jikryonggyoim, whose collar is straight and the hem crossed with back slits. Hakchangui was inner under official attire in the early 19th century, and it is estimated that it began to be used at the end of the 18th century when the policy of changing the Changui worn as an inner robe of court uniform to a white unlined garment worn as a base when wearing a uniform was implemented. The sleeveless Queja type of Hakchangui has been worn since the 17th century, and it lasted until the 19th century and was worn as innerwear like the Jikryonggyoim type of Hakchangui. Based on the Hakchang system of the Ming Dynasty in the 17th and 18th centuries, Hakchangui in the late Joseon Dynasty showed a small portion of its composition characteristics. Around the 19th century, it was separated from Hakchang in the Ming Dynasty and developed into a unique style of Joseon.

참고문헌 (68)

  1. 이연순, "16세기 중반 詠鶴詩에 나타난 鶴의 의미 연구 - 「次玉堂失鶴韻」을 중심으로", 韓國古典硏究, (35), pp.223~256 (2016), 한국고전연구학회[DOI]
  2. "高麗史節要卷8"[URL]
  3. 이민주, "玉所 權燮의 鶴氅衣에 관한 硏究-玉所稿』소재 학창의 관계자료를 대상으로-", 복식문화연구, 13(2), pp.269~279 (2005), 복식문화학회
  4. 박선희, "학창의(鶴氅衣) 연구", 복식, 61(2), pp.60~71 (2011), 한국복식학회
  5. 김다은, "17-18세기 학창의(鶴氅衣)에 대한 연구 - 장만(張晩, 1566~1629) 유복본 초상화를 중심으로 -", 복식, 69(7), pp.18~33 (2019), 한국복식학회[DOI]
  6. 羅竹風, "漢語大詞典12", pp.1153~ (1993), 漢語大詞典出版社
  7. "晉書列傳卷84 第54 王恭"[URL]
  8. 高春明, "中國服饰名物考", pp.254~ (2001), 上海文化出版社
  9. "三國演義第38回定三分隆中決策戰長江孫氏報讎"[URL]
  10. 周思源, "试述“羽衣” 的文化内涵,民闾文化论坛", 民闾文化论坛, 90 (2011)[DOI]
  11. 黃鋼, "服飾中華 : 中華服飾七千年2", pp.193~ (2011), 清華大學出版社
  12. Stephen Little, "TAOISM AND THE ARTS OF CHINA", pp.52~ (2000), Art Institute of Chicago
  13. 吴羽, "唐宋世俗人士穿着道服考", 晋阳学刊, 5, pp.89~ (2009)[DOI]
  14. "Museum of Fine Arts Boston"[URL]
  15. 撷芳主人, "大明衣冠图志", pp.304~ (2016), 北京大學出版社
  16. "北京故宮博物院"[URL]
  17. "北京故宮博物院"[URL]
  18. 王思義, "三才圖會上" (1988), 上海古籍出版社
  19. 蒋玉秋, "明鉴 : 明代服裝形制硏究" (2021), 中國纺织出版社有限公司
  20. 丁艳芳, "『金瓶梅词话』男子服饰新探", 南方文物, 4, pp.108~ (2012)
  21. "靑城雜記卷3 醒言"[URL]
  22. "燕巖集卷2 煙湘閣選本答李仲存書"[URL]
  23. 박종채, "역주 과정록", pp.138~139 (1997), 태학사
  24. "靑莊舘全書卷28 士小節"[URL]
  25. 이창희, "玉所稿9", pp.297~ (2007), 다운샘
  26. "沙溪全書卷25 家禮輯覽"[URL]
  27. 朴珪壽, "居家雜服攷", pp.105~ (2000), 도서출판 석실
  28. 강순제, "한국복식사전", pp.175~ (2015), 민속원
  29. "英祖實錄"[URL]
  30. [URL]
  31. "萬機要覽財用編5 信使服着"[URL]
  32. 원중거, "조선후기 지식인, 일본과 만나다", pp.55~ (2006), 소명출판
  33. 박선희, "18세기 이후 통신사 복식 연구", 박사, 의류직물학, pp.2011
  34. 남옥, "붓끝으로 부사산 바람을 가르다", pp.219~ (2006), 소명출판
  35. 김인겸, "일동장유가", pp.176~ (2007), 보고사
  36. "海槎日記 5"[URL]
  37. "宋子大全附錄卷18 語錄崔愼錄下"[URL]
  38. "寒水齋集卷6 書答李君晦"[URL]
  39. 국립중앙박물관, "초상화의 비밀", pp.196~ (2011)
  40. "전라남도 문화재자료"[URL]
  41. "宋子大全卷118 書答朴是曾"[URL]
  42. "寒水齋集卷6 書答李君晦"[URL]
  43. "星湖全集卷12 書答鄭汝逸家禮疾書問目壬子"[URL]
  44. "星湖全集卷12 人事門帶"[URL]
  45. "경상북도 문화재자료"[URL]
  46. "燕巖集卷2 煙湘閣選本答李仲存書"[URL]
  47. 조선미, "한국의 초상화 : 형(形)과 영(影)의 예술", pp.207~ (2009), 돌베개
  48. "Encyclopedia of Korean Cultur"[URL]
  49. "星湖僿說卷12 人事門帶"[URL]
  50. "星湖僿說卷5 萬物門掛背"[URL]
  51. "五洲衍文長箋散稿人事篇服食類布帛"[URL]
  52. 전주이씨 묘 출토복식 조사보고서- 광주 고읍 인평대군파 의원군 일가, "경기도박물관", 26~ (2001)
  53. "五禮吉禮序例冠冕圖"[URL]
  54. "景慕宮儀軌卷1 圖說祀官祭服圖說"[URL]
  55. "承政院日記"[URL]
  56. "與猶堂全書文集卷9 公服議"[URL]
  57. "與猶堂全書喪禮4箋卷6 喪具訂3"[URL]
  58. "景慕宮儀軌祀官祭服圖說"[URL]
  59. "景慕宮儀軌卷1 圖說祀官祭服圖說, "中單以白紗爲之。皁領緣""[URL]
  60. 서유구, "씨앗을 뿌리는 사람", pp.97~ (2016), 풍석문화재단
  61. 이은주, "남녕위(南寧尉) 윤의선(尹宜善)의 1837년「혼수발기」 속 관복(冠服) 고찰", 문화재, 52(3), pp.200~221 (2019), 국립문화재연구원[DOI]
  62. 이은주, "철릭에 대한 사회학적 분석", 한국의류학회지, 13(4), pp.8~9 (1989)
  63. "弘齋全書卷175 日得錄訓語"[URL]
  64. "日省錄"[URL]
  65. "樊巖集卷18 詩稀年錄中"[URL]
  66. 문화재청, "한국의 초상화 : 역사 속의 인물과 조우하다", pp.34~ (2007)
  67. 빙허각 이씨, "閨閤叢書", pp.151~ (2008), 보진재
  68. 문화재청, "문화재대관 중요민속자료2 복식·자수편", pp.141~ (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

중국 학창(鶴氅)의 형성과 전개 과정에 관한 연구김혜란, 홍나영한복문화학회 · 한복문화2022 · 제25권 제4호조선후기 관원 조복(朝服)의 구성과 형태 연구최연우한복문화학회 · 한복문화2015 · 제18권 제3호조선시대 방령의(方領衣)에 관한 연구이동아한복문화학회 · 한복문화2014 · 제17권 제1호명대(明代) 곤룡포(袞龍袍) 형태 연구최연우, 溫少華한복문화학회 · 한복문화2021 · 제24권 제2호조선시대 남자 포에 나타난 무의 형태변화에 관한 연구김신애, 장민정한국니트디자인학회 · 패션과 니트2015 · 제13권 제2호조선시대 도포(道袍)의 형태(形態)에 관한 연구 -도포유물의 실측도를 중심으로-김정애, 이상은한복문화학회 · 한복문화2013 · 제16권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)

성역할 정체감이 성태도와 외모관리행동에 미치는 영향전대근pp. 23-3520대 비만 남성의 체형에서 나타나는 토르소 유형별 보디스 패턴 비교차수정pp. 37-54반려동물 수의(壽衣) 시장현황과 반려인의 수의 선호도 조사연구이정란, 이수혜pp. 55-67제주도 전통 수의 중 검은 호상에 대한 실증적 고찰장현주, 고순희pp. 69-87디지털 패션 테크 플랫폼 무신사의 반응형 웹 디자인 개발염미선, 이홍pp. 89-105
원문 보기