본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

재북한일본인들의 사회경제적 지위와 북한의 일본인기술자 정책(1945~1950)

Socioeconomic Status of Japanese and Policies towards Japanese Technicians in North Korea (1945-1950)

0

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

해방직후 북한의 재북일본인 정책과 조선인들의 일본인관은 한국현대사의 전개와 관련해 매우 중요한 테마이다. 일제 식민권력이 붕괴되면서 조선인들이 제 기관들을 접수하고 일본인 고위관리들을 체포·처벌하는 과정은 조선총독부 권력으로부터 조선인 자치기구인 인민위원회로 이어지는 권력의 이양과정이 어떤 양상을 띠었는가를 선명히 드러낼 수 있다. 물론 그 과정이 상당히 단절적이었음은 분명하지만, 국가를 운영해본 경험이 없었던 북한지도부가 일제의 기관과 전문 인력을 그대로 물려받았다는 점은 어느 면에서 양자가 연속성을 띠고 있었음을 의미한다. 일본인들을 향해 분출된 조선인들의 반일감정을 분석하고 있는 이 연구는 일제시기에 형성된 민족주의가 해방을 계기로 표면화되는 과정이 현대 남북한 각각의 국민과 인민의 형성에 어떠한 영향을 끼쳤는지 엿볼 수 있는 효과적 통로를 제시한다. 학문적 차원을 넘어 재북일본인문제는 현실 외교정책에 영향을 끼칠 수 있는 매우 민감한 사안이다. 북한과 일본의 수교문제가 거론될 때 일본이 협상의 범주에 포괄할 수 있는 의제가 과거 북한의 일본인 억류와 사유재산권 박탈문제이기 때문이다. 이 주제를 둘러싼 한국인들과 일본인들 간의 관점 차이는 양국 간의 역사적 갈등이 학문영역에까지 날카롭게 연장되고 있음을 드러낸다. 필자는 해방직후 한반도에 잔류하고 있던 일본인들을 향해 분출된 조선인들의 반일감정과 그 기저에 놓인 민족주의가 모든 면에서 정당했다고 변론할 생각은 없다. 사실 당대의 식견있는 조선인들조차 일본인 학대로까지 발전한 반일행위의 이면에 복수심이 도사리고 있었으며, 그것이 “민족 배외주의”의 징후에 다름 아니라고 진단했을 정도였다. 이 연구는 그러한 반성을 겸허히 수용하고 있지만, 일본측이 집착하고 있는 부당한 문제제기들의 사실관계를 바로잡는 작업이 중요하다고 본다. 과연 일본측의 주장대로 해방 후 일본인기술자들은 북한에 강제 억류되었던 것일까? 또한 일본인들의 사유재산이 불법적으로 북한측에 몰수되었다는 점만이 진실의 전부일까? 이 두 가지 민감한 문제들은 북한당국과 재북일본인 양자 간 문제라기보다 소련측까지 얽힌 매우 복잡한 문제였다. 이 연구는 그러한 3자 간 이해관계를 상세히 규명함으로써, 일본측의 논리가 이미 사실관계에 오류를 내재하고 있음을 밝히려 한다.

Abstract

Issues regarding Japanese in Korea have not received attention compared to issues relating to Koreans in Japan. That is one reason why issues concerning Japanese in Korea have been understood as a matter of Japanese modern-contemporary history, while the issue of Koreans in Japan has been clearly treated as a national problem of Korean modern-contemporary history. However, while preparing this article, I recognized that if the problem of Japanese in Korea is left in a vacuum, it will be a mistake to skip important situations in Korean contemporary history without sufficient understanding of them. The desire of Koreans for autonomy that had been suppressed during the period of Japanese imperialism started to spurt with liberation. Koreans dominated authority by taking over organizations which Japanese had monopolized. Also, Koreans arrested and punished high-ranking Japanese government officials. North of the 38th parallel, autonomy could be realized due to the Soviet Union’s military support. In fact, the Soviet military transferred the administrative power that Japanese had exercised to the People’s Committee. Subsequently, they arrested Japanese civil service, justice, and police officials. The authorities’ actions to seize Japanese properties redoubled the hardship of Japanese. Japanese whose houses were confiscated were accommodated in poor facilities until their return to Japan. The majority of them tried to escape from North Korea to South Korea, taking risks. Although seizing Japanese properties progressed automatically according to local situations, seizures reached legal procedures with the introduction of the Land Reform Act and the Nationalization of Important Industries Act after the construction of central administrative agencies. After the liberation of Korea, Japanese had to endure difficult lives. Of course, the lives of Koreans too were in crisis, but the lives of Japanese were worse. Japanese who fell to being people of a defeated nation had their properties confiscated and they began to receive discrimination. After many Japanese had suffered, Soviet military and Korean officials changed their policies against Japanese, and simultaneously earnestly propelled their return to Japan. Immediately after liberation, Japanese technicians, laborers, and clerks were thrown out of factories now dominated by Koreans. It was expected to be difficult to manage those factories without Japanese technicians, but most Koreans argued that Koreans had to manage factories by themselves instead of entrusting management to Japanese, this as a symbol of the independence of Korea. As time passed, problems arose from managing factories. Accordingly, some people raised the opinion to re-hire Japanese technicians, but those opinions were buried under the strong narrative of “urgent business in the current circumstances is the fulfillment of the independence of Korea.” However, the suppressed realism under radicalism was achieving power slowly. With this change, the re-hiring of Japanese technicians was begun. In other aspects, even regarding Japanese technicians there were various opinions about North Korean industry construction. One side, which insisted that Japanese had to throw away narrow nationalism and have the attitude of internationalism, clearly expressed the opinion that Japanese technicians had not to save the technical support for North Korean nation-building. Meanwhile, the other side asserted reconstruction of Japan as their ultimate goal, which made their stance that support of the restoration of North Korean industry was just their means of living, and not an ultimate goal. The latter was the opinion of most Japanese technicians. Japanese were still receiving good treatment in terms of wages and rations, but they eagerly hoped to return to Japan because they felt psychological anxiety for the disconnected situation between Japan and North Korea in terms of politics. There is no doubt that North Korean’s actions of arresting and using Japanese technicians were too much. However, North Korea’s concern that Japanese technicians might reveal industrial and military secrets was also appropriate.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 김석형, "나는 조선노동당원이오!" (2001), 선인
  2. 吳泳鎭, "하나의 證言" (1952), 國民思想指導院
  3. 이연식, "조선을 떠나며" (2012), 역사비평사
  4. 전현수, "쉬띄꼬프일기(1946~1948)" (2004), 국사편찬위원회
  5. S. L. 찌흐빈스키, "蘇聯과 北韓과의 關係-1945~1980(Отношения Советского Союза с Народной Кореей)" (1987), 國土統一院
  6. 이소가야 스에지, "우리 청춘의 조선" (1988), 사계절
  7. 김경남, "재조선 일본인들의 귀환과 전후의 한국 인식", 동북아역사논총, (21), pp.305~359 (2008), 동북아역사재단
  8. 김재웅, "북한의 인민국가 건설과 계급구조 재편 : 1945∼1950", 박사, 한국사학과, pp.2014
  9. 최영호, "한반도 거주 일본인의 귀환과정에서 나타난 식민지 지배에 관한 인식", 동북아역사논총, (21), pp.263~303 (2008), 동북아역사재단
  10. 鎌田正二, "北鮮の日本人苦難記-日窒興南工場の最後" (1970), 時事通信社
  11. 磯谷季次, "朝鮮終戰記" (1980), 未來社
  12. 森田芳夫, "朝鮮終戰の記錄" (1964), 巖南堂書店

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)