본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

文末表現の習得に関する研究 ― メタ認知の活性化を目指すピア活動 ―

Research on Acquisition of end󰠏of󰠏sentence Expressions: Peer Activities Aimed at Activating Meta Cognition

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

This paper is a practical report of an attempt to self󰠏introspections and peer activities in order to acquire the end󰠏of󰠏sentence expression, which are frequently pointed out as misuses in Korean native speakers. In particular, we will look at the possibility of peer activities with the production of end󰠏of󰠏sentence expressions. In peer activities, the learner thinks about the reason why they can or cannot produce well, discusses how to produce it, and tries to consider it from the learner's point of view. we will present the possibility of more efficient peer activities, including the impressions of learners regarding this activity regarding meta cognition. Differences were also confirmed in each expression, which had differences in student’s introspection. For example, in the case of <kiniitteimasu>, it was introspected as “an expression I know”, but it could not be produced accurately. It can be produced until “kiniiru”, but it seems that it is still difficult to produce “~teimasu”. In this paper, students think about the production of expressions themselves, and then try to share it among students, and the possibility is seen even in a short time. In the future, we would like to increase the time for self󰠏reflection and peer activities to try to produce more solid expressions.

Abstract

This paper is a practical report of an attempt to self󰠏introspections and peer activities in order to acquire the end󰠏of󰠏sentence expression, which are frequently pointed out as misuses in Korean native speakers. In particular, we will look at the possibility of peer activities with the production of end󰠏of󰠏sentence expressions. In peer activities, the learner thinks about the reason why they can or cannot produce well, discusses how to produce it, and tries to consider it from the learner's point of view. we will present the possibility of more efficient peer activities, including the impressions of learners regarding this activity regarding meta cognition. Differences were also confirmed in each expression, which had differences in student’s introspection. For example, in the case of <kiniitteimasu>, it was introspected as “an expression I know”, but it could not be produced accurately. It can be produced until “kiniiru”, but it seems that it is still difficult to produce “~teimasu”. In this paper, students think about the production of expressions themselves, and then try to share it among students, and the possibility is seen even in a short time. In the future, we would like to increase the time for self󰠏reflection and peer activities to try to produce more solid expressions.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. 박경애, "사고동사 「と思う」「と考える」의 사용실태 - 일본어 모어화자와 한국인 일본어 학습자가 쓴 의견문에서의 용례를 중심으로 -", 일본어교육연구, (37), pp.49~65 (2016), 한국일어교육학회
  2. 손미정, "학습자 중심으로 고찰한 효과적 작문수업 - 피어러닝 및 교사-학습자 컨퍼런스를 중심으로 -", 일어일문학연구, 81(1), pp.153~170 (2012), 한국일어일문학회[DOI]
  3. 유수연, "초․중급 단계 한국인 일본어 학습자 작문의 오류 분석 ― 학습자간 첨삭과 교사 첨삭의 비교를 중심으로 ―", 日本語敎育, (62), pp.69~81 (2012), 한국일본어교육학회
  4. 조남성, "한국에서의 일본어 작문 연구와 교육의 현황", 일본어교육연구, (36), pp.111~125 (2016), 한국일어교육학회
  5. 이시즈카 켄, "JFL環境の韓国人学習者を対象としたピア․レスポンスの研究 - ビリーフ調査および中国人学習者との比較 -", 동북아 문화연구, 1(28), pp.451~467 (2011), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]
  6. 石塚健, "韓国母語話者を対象としたピア・ラーニングの研究", 박사, pp.2012
  7. 코가마키코, "文章構成に着目した日本語作文授業の実践研究 -ピア・レスポンスを通じた学習者の作文の変化を中心に-", 일본어학연구, (35), pp.439~459 (2012), 한국일본어학회
  8. 白川博之, "日本語研究から日本語教育研究への越境", 日本語の研究, 14(2), pp.68~83 (2018), 日本語学会
  9. 館岡洋子, "ひとりで読むことからピア・リーディングへ", pp.20~ (2011), 東洋大学出版会
  10. 라이 진춰에, "日本語教育における作文指導 -台湾の場合-", 일본어교육연구, (37), pp.7~25 (2016), 한국일어교육학회
  11. 広瀬和佳子, "母語によるピア・レスポンス(peer response)が推敲作文におよぼす効果一韓国人中級学習者を対象とした3ヶ月間の授業活動をとおして一", 言語文化と日本語教育, 19, pp.24~37 (2000), お茶の水女子大学日本言語文化学研究会
  12. Flavell, J. H., "Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitivedevelopmental Inquiry", American Psychologist, 34(10), pp.906~911 (1979), American Psychological Association
  13. R.Beach, "Handbook of Writing Research", pp.389~412 (2006), The Guilford Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)