본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

JFL環境の韓国人学習者を対象としたピア․レスポンスにおける学習者の意識の研究 -グループ内のレベル差の観点から-

Study of the learner's consciousness in the Peer Response that targets the Korean learners of JFL environment -From the angle of the level difference in the group-

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

In this study, I focused on the level difference between the members of the group in a Peer-Response. The goal is to clarify the question of what differences arise in the consciousness of the learner by the level difference in the group. I had a questionnaire after writing class in order to solve this problem. Three issues will be mentioned as future challenges. First one is “Content to learn the advanced learner”. Not only higher capacity than other members learners teach in the group, about what to learn and the notice was obtained, there is a need to more specifically survey. The second is the “Contribution way for low levels learner”. If the Japanese ability is inferior to other members, it will become many situations that taught to advanced learners. So it will deviate from the basic elements of the original cooperative learning. It is important to figure out what contribute to the group members in activities. Class of Peer response is required ingenuity, such as can feel that he is useful. And, the third one is “Way for the role is not too unilaterally” Teachers will need to consider the basic elements of cooperative learning. That is the “equal” and “reciprocity”.

Abstract

In this study, I focused on the level difference between the members of the group in a Peer-Response. The goal is to clarify the question of what differences arise in the consciousness of the learner by the level difference in the group. I had a questionnaire after writing class in order to solve this problem. Three issues will be mentioned as future challenges. First one is “Content to learn the advanced learner”. Not only higher capacity than other members learners teach in the group, about what to learn and the notice was obtained, there is a need to more specifically survey. The second is the “Contribution way for low levels learner”. If the Japanese ability is inferior to other members, it will become many situations that taught to advanced learners. So it will deviate from the basic elements of the original cooperative learning. It is important to figure out what contribute to the group members in activities. Class of Peer response is required ingenuity, such as can feel that he is useful. And, the third one is “Way for the role is not too unilaterally” Teachers will need to consider the basic elements of cooperative learning. That is the “equal” and “reciprocity”.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 이시즈카 켄, "JFL環境の韓国語母語話者の学習者を対象としたピア・レスポンスの研究 - 質問紙調査の分析から見る協働学習の成功要因と授業デザインの可能性 -", 동북아 문화연구, 1(18), pp.423~446 (2009), 동북아시아문화학회
  2. 이시즈카 켄, "韓国語母語話者の学習者を対象としたジグソー学習法による読解授業の試み", 일어일문학, (44), pp.183~201 (2009), 대한일어일문학회
  3. 이시즈카 켄, "ピア・リーディングによる読解授業の問題点を探る -JFL環境で学ぶ韓国語母語話者の学習者を対象とした実践を通して-", 일어일문학, (47), pp.171~187 (2010), 대한일어일문학회
  4. 이시즈카 켄, "JFL環境の韓国人学習者を対象としたピア․レスポンスの研究 - ビリーフ調査および中国人学習者との比較 -", 동북아 문화연구, 1(28), pp.451~467 (2011), 동북아시아문화학회
  5. 이시즈카켄, "JFL環境の韓国人学習者を対象としたピア․レスポンスの研究 - 話し合いの言語およびグループを中心に -", 동북아 문화연구, 1(31), pp.75~92 (2012), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]
  6. 池田玲子, "ピア․レスポンスを取り入れた日本語作文指導", 小出記念日本語教育研究会論文集, (11), pp.131~136 (2003), 小出記念日本語教育研究会
  7. 池田玲子, "日本語学習における学習者同士の相互助言(ピア․レスポンス)", 日本語学, 23, pp.36~50 (2004), 明治書院
  8. 池田玲子, "ピア․ラーニング入門-創造的な学びのデザインのために", pp.1~143 (2007), ひつじ書房
  9. 池田玲子, "言語文化と日本語教育", pp.46~83 (2008), お茶の水女子大学日本言語文化学研究会
  10. ジョンソン,D.W., "学習の輪 アメリカの協同学習入門", pp.1~168 (1998), 二瓶社
  11. ジョンソン,D.W., "学生参加型の大学授業-協同学習への実践ガイド", pp.1~254 (2001), 玉川大学出版部
  12. 田中信之, "日本語教育における学習者の作文に対する学習信念", 北陸大学紀要, (20), pp.325~334 (1996), 北陸大学
  13. 田中信之, "中国人学習者を対象としたピア․レスポンス -ビリーフ調査をもとに-", 일본어교육, (126), pp.144~153 (2005), 日本語教育学会
  14. 田中信之, "中国人学習者を対象としたピア․レスポンス -ビリーフ調査から話し合いの問題点を探る-", 小出記念日本語教育研究会論文集, (14), pp.21~35 (2006), 小出記念日本語教育研究会
  15. 田中信之, "ピア․レスポンスにおける話し合い-話し合いの言語とグループ編成についての考察-", 北陸大学紀要, (31), pp.201~211 (2007), 北陸大学
  16. 田中信之, "学習者作文に対するピア․フィードバックの分析―フィードバックの教示と推敲の二つの視点からー", 小出記念日本語教育研究会論文集, (18), pp.81~94 (2010), 小出記念日本語教育研究会
  17. Y.シャラン, "「協働」による総合学習の設計-グループ․プロジェクト入門―", pp.1~208 (2001), 北大路書房
  18. Ferris, D., "Teaching ESL composition purpose, Process and Practice", pp.1~448 (1998), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers
  19. Liu,J, "Peer response in second language writing classrooms", pp.1~182 (2005), The University of Michigan Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)