止攝 諸韻의 中古音 再構 - 한일중 및 베트남･티베트 자료를 중심으로 -
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
The aim of this study is to verify the validity of my reconstruction Wei rhyme(微韻) [ ii] and [ iui] in Zhi rhyme group(止攝), using the literature on Sino-Korean, Manyō Kana or Japanese phonetic alphabet, Modern Chinese dialects, Sino-Vietnamese and Sino-Tibetan. The main grounds are as follows:First, in kaikou final all the initials in Wei rhyme are /의/ in Sino-Korean,whereas in hekou final velars and laryngeals are /위/, bilabials /이/. The fact that kaikou and hekou final both have /이/([i]) represents the vowel and ending of Wei rhyme in Ancient Chinese is [i]. Second, the sound value of the other i or ï in Old Japanese has similar sound quality to Wei rhyme, the former [ i i](or [ ii]), the latter [ ii] and [ i ui]. The reason that Manyō Kanas in kaikou final were made few use of seems to have something to do with the medial of the third division for which ones in hekou final were substituted. Third, Sino-Vietnamese has [i] and [ui], which have the same sound value to Sino-Korean. Finally, bilabials in Sino-Tibetan were reflected as yi[ji]. It appears that being based on y[j] the medial was not [ i], but [ i].
Abstract
The aim of this study is to verify the validity of my reconstruction Wei rhyme(微韻) [ ii] and [ iui] in Zhi rhyme group(止攝), using the literature on Sino-Korean, Manyō Kana or Japanese phonetic alphabet, Modern Chinese dialects, Sino-Vietnamese and Sino-Tibetan. The main grounds are as follows:First, in kaikou final all the initials in Wei rhyme are /의/ in Sino-Korean,whereas in hekou final velars and laryngeals are /위/, bilabials /이/. The fact that kaikou and hekou final both have /이/([i]) represents the vowel and ending of Wei rhyme in Ancient Chinese is [i]. Second, the sound value of the other i or ï in Old Japanese has similar sound quality to Wei rhyme, the former [ i i](or [ ii]), the latter [ ii] and [ i ui]. The reason that Manyō Kanas in kaikou final were made few use of seems to have something to do with the medial of the third division for which ones in hekou final were substituted. Third, Sino-Vietnamese has [i] and [ui], which have the same sound value to Sino-Korean. Finally, bilabials in Sino-Tibetan were reflected as yi[ji]. It appears that being based on y[j] the medial was not [ i], but [ i].
참고문헌 (52)
- 김대성, "상대 일본어 이(イ) 을류의 소릿값 연구", 일어일문학연구, 45(1), pp.219~236 (2003), 한국일어일문학회
- 김대성, "고대 일본어의 음운에 대하여", pp.119~123 (2003), 제이앤씨
- 김대성, "상대 일본어의 모음체계 연구- 을류를 중심으로 -", 언어학, 11(2) (2003), 대한언어학회
- 김무림, "한국 한자음의 근대성(1): 반영 양상의 종합", 한국어학, 30, pp.89~132 (2006), 한국어학회
- 김용옥, "동양학 어떻게 할 것인가", pp.349~361 (1992), 통나무
- 동양학연구소, "신증유합" (1992), 단국대학교출판부
- 동양학연구소, "천자문" (1995), 단국대학교출판부
- 동양학연구소, "훈몽자회" (1995), 단국대학교출판부
- 박병채, "고대국어의 연구-음운편-", pp.182~193 (1986), 고려대학교출판부
- 이돈주, "향가 용자 중의 ‘賜’자에 대하여", 국어학, 20, pp.72~89 (1990), 국어학회
- 최미현, "『전운옥편(全韻玉篇)』에 반영된 지섭(止攝)의 양상에 대하여", 새얼어문논집, 18, pp.213~231 (2006), 새얼어문학회
- 최영애, "고대한어음운학개요" (1985), 민음사
- 秋谷裕幸, "客家語における微韻唇音字", 中国語学, 240, pp.11~20 (1993), 日本中国語学会
- 浦上準之助, "奈良朝日本語のオ列甲類乙類音節について - 奄美大島方言祖語に見る痕跡 -", 聖徳学園岐阜教育大学紀要, 26, pp.143~161 (1993)
- 岡本勲, "日本漢字音に於ける止摂の所謂長音表記に就て--韻鏡の開合･開･合の分類基準との関連に於て", 国語国文, 38(8), pp.1~19 (1969), 中央図書出版社
- 沖森卓也, "歌経標式･注釈と研究" (1993), 桜楓社
- 小倉肇, "上代イ列母音の音的性格について", 国学院雑誌, pp.263~274 (1970), 国学院大学出版部
- 沢瀉久孝, "作者類別年代順万葉集" (1976), 芸林舎
- 加倉井正, "上代特殊仮名遣における甲類･乙類仮名について", 現代科学論叢, 15, pp.1~17 (1981), 現代科学研究会
- キム･デソン, "中古漢字音の再構成 ー韓日資料による韻母音を中心にー", 박사, pp.2000
- 金大星, "上代日本語の「エ乙類」の音価推定", 東アジア日本語教育･日本文化研究, 6, pp.305~317 (2003), 東アジア日本語敎育日本文化硏究學會
- 河野六郎, "河野六郎著作集 第２巻", pp.103~145 (1993), 平凡社
- 小島憲之, "万葉集(新編日本古典文学全集)" (1996), 小学館
- 小島憲之, "日本書紀(新編日本古典文学全集)" (1998), 小学館
- 佐々木勇, "日本漢音における止摂合口字音の受容に見られる位相差", 国語国文, 73(7), pp.21~37 (2004), 中央図書出版
- 佐藤清, "琉球古文献におけるイ列乙類音対応音の表記について", 沖縄文化研究, 13, pp.333~371 (1987), 法政大学
- 柴田武, "奄美大島諸方言におけるオ列甲類と乙類の区別 (奄美-5-)", 人類科学, 33, pp.41~59 (1980), 九学会連合
- 上代文献を読む会, "古京遺文注釈" (1989), 桜楓社
- 高木市之助, "万葉集(日本古典文学大系)" (1962), 岩波書店
- 鶴久, "萬葉集" (1995), おうふう
- 藤堂明保, "中国語音韻論", pp.264~265 (1980), 光生館
- 藤堂明保, "学研漢和大字典" (1997), 学習研究社
- 西宮一民, "日本上代の文章と表記", pp.29~ (1988), 風間書房
- 荻原麻男, "古事記･上代歌謠(日本古典文学全集)" (1976), 小学館
- 東ヶ崎祐一, "万葉仮名「閇･米」について - 中古漢字音の音変遷に関連して -", 東北大学文学部日本語学科論集, 3, pp.61~70 (1993)
- 福永静哉, "先行音節の母音よりするイ列乙類の性格", 女子大国文, 4 (1956), 京都女子大
- 学国文学会, "上代特殊仮名遣いと朝鮮帰化人 - オ段甲乙音を中心に調音音声学と朝 鮮語音韻論からみた万葉仮名 -", 國語學, 52(3), pp.91~92 (2001), 日本語学会
- 真武直, "中古漢語音韻の源流と上代特殊仮名甲乙類別の背景", 支那学研究, 24(25) (1960)
- 広島支那学会, "中古漢語と越南漢字音", pp.455~456 (1993), 汲古書院
- 森博達, "古代の音韻と日本書紀の成立" (1991), 大修館書店
- 森山隆, "上代におけるエ列乙類の性格", 語文研究, 8, pp.21~29 (1959), 九州大学国語国文学会
- 山口角鷹, "止摂字和音考", 東京学芸大学研究報告, 9 (1958), 東京学芸大学
- Bernhard Karlgren, "Compendium of Phonetics in Ancient and Archaic Chinese", pp.263~266 (1963), Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities
- E. G. Pulleyblank, "Middle Chinese: A Study in Historical Phonology" (1984), University of British Columbia Press
- Geoffrey K. Pullum, "Phonetic Symbol Guide" (1996), The University of Chicago Press
- 北京大學中國語言文學系語言學敎硏室, "漢語方音字汇" (1989), 文字改革出版社
- 董同龢, "漢語音韻學", pp.166~168 (1993), 文史哲出版社
- 陸志韋, "陸志韋語言學著作集(一)", pp.11~48 (1985), 中華書局
- 羅常培, "唐五代西北方音", pp.43~47 (1933), 國立中央硏究院歴史語言硏究所
- 王力, "漢語語音史", pp.226~227 (1985), 中國社會科學出版社
- 嚴學宭, "廣韻導讀", pp.73~74 (1990), 巴蜀書社
- 余廼永, "新校互註宋本廣韻" (1993), 中文大學出版社