中古漢語 2等韻의 介音 存在 考察 –韓日漢字音 2等韻의 字音을 참고하여–
The study of being in Medial 2nd rhyme of Middle Chinese -Refer to the notaion of 2nd rhyme in Sino-Korean & Sino-Japanese-
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study is the summary of precedent studies about Medial 2nd rhymes and the opinions about it. Through the interpretation about the Medial 2nd rhymes of Sino-Korean and Sino-Japanese and rhymes of chinese character text and Tongjia-ji(phonetic loan character), the main vowel change of 2nd rhymes and division rhymes are confirmed. Consequently, it reached the following conclusion. (1)Division of 2nd rhymes showed that main vowel is different from character of different group and it was reasoned that Medial 2nd rhymes of Old Chinese were omitted from Old Chinese during the Period of North and South Dynasies. (2)It is assumed that the time when medial 2nd rhymes of old chinese were omitted finished in Yang Dynasty at the latest as Baxer’s theory. (3)As a result, main vowel of 2nd rhymes became the sound of front. Affected by frontal main vowel, it had appeared as -e form in sino-Japanese Go’on and as a contracted sound such as -jo form in Sino-Korean. (4)Palatalization arisen in Modern chinese seems to have been affected by frontal main vowel. (5)Therefore Sino-Korean and Sino-Japanese such as -e form and -jo form of 2nd rhymes is not related to the Medial that existed in Middle chinese, but to the attitude of Sino-Korean and Sino-Japanese.
Abstract
This study is the summary of precedent studies about Medial 2nd rhymes and the opinions about it. Through the interpretation about the Medial 2nd rhymes of Sino-Korean and Sino-Japanese and rhymes of chinese character text and Tongjia-ji(phonetic loan character), the main vowel change of 2nd rhymes and division rhymes are confirmed. Consequently, it reached the following conclusion. (1)Division of 2nd rhymes showed that main vowel is different from character of different group and it was reasoned that Medial 2nd rhymes of Old Chinese were omitted from Old Chinese during the Period of North and South Dynasies. (2)It is assumed that the time when medial 2nd rhymes of old chinese were omitted finished in Yang Dynasty at the latest as Baxer’s theory. (3)As a result, main vowel of 2nd rhymes became the sound of front. Affected by frontal main vowel, it had appeared as -e form in sino-Japanese Go’on and as a contracted sound such as -jo form in Sino-Korean. (4)Palatalization arisen in Modern chinese seems to have been affected by frontal main vowel. (5)Therefore Sino-Korean and Sino-Japanese such as -e form and -jo form of 2nd rhymes is not related to the Medial that existed in Middle chinese, but to the attitude of Sino-Korean and Sino-Japanese.
참고문헌 (28)
- 권혁준, "《東國正韻》과《古今韻會擧要》의 效·流攝음운 체계 비교", 論文集, 38, pp.1~16 (2001), 강남대학교
- 김무림, "한국 한자음의 근대성(1): 반영 양상의 종합", 한국어학, 30, pp.89~132 (2006), 한국어학회
- 김무림, "국어 한자음의 체계적 근대성", 한국어학, 34, pp.113~139 (2007), 한국어학회
- 김정빈, "日本吳音硏究", pp.300~313 (2007), 책사랑
- 김태경, "效梗攝 二等字의 한국한자음과 二等韻 介音", 중국어문학논집, (82), pp.45~62 (2013), 중국어문학연구회
- 박병채, "고대국어의 연구", pp.122~128 (1971), 고려대학교 출판부
- 송재한, "2等韻에 반영된 日本吳音 エ段音에 대한 考察 -假․效․山․咸攝을 中心으로-", 일본언어문화, (19), pp.221~237 (2011), 한국일본언어문화학회
- 송재한, "日本 吳音의 韻類體系 硏究", 박사, 일어일문학과, pp.2012
- 이경철, "한일한자음 체계의 비교연구", pp.265~268 (2003), 보고사
- 이영월, "등운이론과 훈민정음 28자모의 음운성격- 창제동기와 목적을 중심으로 하여", 중국어문논역총간, (27), pp.123~150 (2010), 중국어문논역학회
- 이준환, "16세기 후반․17세기 國語 漢字音 韻母의 대응 양상 및 특징(1)", 한국어학, 51, pp.189~219 (2011), 한국어학회
- 이준환, "16세기 후반․17세기 國語 漢字音 韻母의 대응 양상 및 특징(2)", 대동문화연구, (74), pp.255~286 (2011), 대동문화연구원
- 의 再構, "中國語文學論集", 2000, 107~124, pp.中國語文學硏究會
- 정영지, "二等 開口 喉牙音字 중 i-介音의 來源 고찰", 중국어문학, 43, pp.317~333 (2004), 영남중국어문학회
- 조대하, "吳音과 韓國 漢字音의 關連에 대하여", 日本學報, 47, pp.262~ (2001), 韓國日本學會
- 李方桂, "중국어 상고음 연구(Ⅱ)", 구결연구, (12), pp.293~354 (2004), 구결학회
- 有坂秀世, "国語音韻史の研究 増補新版", pp.323~ (1957), 三省堂
- 伊藤智ゆき, "朝鮮漢字音硏究", pp.263~265 (2007), 汲古書院
- 河野六郎, "河野六郎著作集2 中国音韻学論文集", pp.456~457 (1979), 平凡社
- 東ヶ崎祐一, "説文解字繋伝にみられる反切下字混用", 中國語學, 250, pp.37~39 (2003)
- 王 力, "漢語語音史-王力文集 第10卷", pp.55~64 (1997), 대일
- 羅常培, "漢魏晉南北朝韻部演變硏究 第一分冊", pp.125~317 (1958), 科學出版社
- 董同龢, "漢語音韻學", pp.275~ (1975), 汎學圖書
- 李方桂, "上古音硏究", pp.21~27 (1980), 商務印書館
- 全昌煥, "日本呉音と中国方言音との音韻的対応についての研究", 博士, pp.2003
- 鄭張尙芳, "上古音系", pp.170~ (2003), 上海敎育出版社
- 馮其庸, "通假字彙釋" (2006), 北京大學出版社
- Baxter, William, "A Handbook of Old Chinese Phonology", pp.258~266 (1992), Mouton de Gruyter