Gewährleistungsstaat und Regulierungsreform in Deutschland: From deregulation to smart regulation
Guarantor state and regulatory reform in Germany : From deregulation to smart regulation
1
조회
0
다운로드
25
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The idea that there are too many regulations excessively restricting the economic freedom of enterprises and citizens is widespread in Germany. Yet empirical evidence supporting this perception does not exist, even from a relative perspective as compared to other countries. Ⅰ. The guarantor state's comprehension of regulation In Germany, as in many states, there have been intensive debates about the changing role of the government over the last 20 years. The concept of the guarantor state is based on the insight that the state does not have a monopoly on the right to formulate and implement policies on public interest issues but rather that this requires the cooperation of government and private actors. The major objective therein is the sound division of roles for the successful fulfillment of public tasks. The guarantor state’s role is thus to choose the mode of regulation that best enables the public interest to be realized as effectively and efficiently as possible while at the same time minimizing the direct and indirect burdens that arise from the regulation. It is assumed that these objectives can best be achieved through the adoption and use of a model of cooperative regulation. The linking function of the model of regulated self-regulation consists of the combination of private and government rationalities in order to achieve an overarching objective, in which the government will take over the responsibility for delivery and designs its role accordingly. Ⅱ. The development of regulatory reform in Germany and the guarantor state The development of the regulatory reform agenda in Germany is characterized by several approaches, which should not be understood as alternatives but which complements capable of enhancing each other. Deregulation: In both the federation (the German state as a whole) as well as in the federal states (the Länder) numerous regulations with too prescriptive impact on economic development have been nullified following the reports of deregulation commissions. In addition, regular legal adjustments are made to purge obsolete or redundant regulations. In this way, between the years 2003 and 2009 more than 1,000 laws and acts were done away with. Regulated self-regulation: Due to the need to secure the public interest, many regulations cannot be waived without providing an alternative. In these cases, the model of self-regulation can be implemented, by which solutions to public interest issues are provided by private standards and market-based approaches to decision-making in line with the public good. Consequently, the responsibility for delivery remains with the government, which shall interfere actively in all cases where entrepreneurial self-regulation methods do not function adequately. Quality of regulation: The importance that the regulatory mode of regulated self-regulation has gained in the regulatory reform agenda makes clear that the critical issue is not only whether a regulation is necessary or can be omitted or waived, but rather the quality of a regulation. Addressing quality issues requires a complex mix of instruments, of which the essential elements are legal impact assessments, especially of bureaucratic and compliance costs, sunset-legislation clauses, evaluation, and experimentation clauses. Ⅲ. Structures and the future of the regulatory reform in Germany Summarizing regulatory reform in Germany over the last 25 years, it can be said that regulatory reform is not a single act but a complex system, one which is subject to continuous development and in a permanent state of implementation. This system consists of quantitative and qualitative elements, which correspond closely to the concept for European law that the European commission calls “Smart Regulation.” Based on this, in 2014 the German federal government passed two resolutions that laid down the agenda for regulatory reform in the coming years. The approach of this new program focuses primarily on the quality of the regulations in order to minimize the resulting burdens for companies and citizens.
Abstract
The idea that there are too many regulations excessively restricting the economic freedom of enterprises and citizens is widespread in Germany. Yet empirical evidence supporting this perception does not exist, even from a relative perspective as compared to other countries. Ⅰ. The guarantor state's comprehension of regulation In Germany, as in many states, there have been intensive debates about the changing role of the government over the last 20 years. The concept of the guarantor state is based on the insight that the state does not have a monopoly on the right to formulate and implement policies on public interest issues but rather that this requires the cooperation of government and private actors. The major objective therein is the sound division of roles for the successful fulfillment of public tasks. The guarantor state’s role is thus to choose the mode of regulation that best enables the public interest to be realized as effectively and efficiently as possible while at the same time minimizing the direct and indirect burdens that arise from the regulation. It is assumed that these objectives can best be achieved through the adoption and use of a model of cooperative regulation. The linking function of the model of regulated self-regulation consists of the combination of private and government rationalities in order to achieve an overarching objective, in which the government will take over the responsibility for delivery and designs its role accordingly. Ⅱ. The development of regulatory reform in Germany and the guarantor state The development of the regulatory reform agenda in Germany is characterized by several approaches, which should not be understood as alternatives but which complements capable of enhancing each other. Deregulation: In both the federation (the German state as a whole) as well as in the federal states (the Länder) numerous regulations with too prescriptive impact on economic development have been nullified following the reports of deregulation commissions. In addition, regular legal adjustments are made to purge obsolete or redundant regulations. In this way, between the years 2003 and 2009 more than 1,000 laws and acts were done away with. Regulated self-regulation: Due to the need to secure the public interest, many regulations cannot be waived without providing an alternative. In these cases, the model of self-regulation can be implemented, by which solutions to public interest issues are provided by private standards and market-based approaches to decision-making in line with the public good. Consequently, the responsibility for delivery remains with the government, which shall interfere actively in all cases where entrepreneurial self-regulation methods do not function adequately. Quality of regulation: The importance that the regulatory mode of regulated self-regulation has gained in the regulatory reform agenda makes clear that the critical issue is not only whether a regulation is necessary or can be omitted or waived, but rather the quality of a regulation. Addressing quality issues requires a complex mix of instruments, of which the essential elements are legal impact assessments, especially of bureaucratic and compliance costs, sunset-legislation clauses, evaluation, and experimentation clauses. Ⅲ. Structures and the future of the regulatory reform in Germany Summarizing regulatory reform in Germany over the last 25 years, it can be said that regulatory reform is not a single act but a complex system, one which is subject to continuous development and in a permanent state of implementation. This system consists of quantitative and qualitative elements, which correspond closely to the concept for European law that the European commission calls “Smart Regulation.” Based on this, in 2014 the German federal government passed two resolutions that laid down the agenda for regulatory reform in the coming years. The approach of this new program focuses primarily on the quality of the regulations in order to minimize the resulting burdens for companies and citizens.
참고문헌 (88)
- Bauer, Christian, "Die Energieversorgung zwischen Regulierungs- und Gewährleistungsstaat" (2014)
- Biermann, Henning, "Verwaltungsmodernisierung in Mecklenburg- Vorpommern" (2011)
- Blanke, Bernhard, "Bürgerengagement und Aktivierender Staat", Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte B, 24-25 (1999)
- BMI, "Moderner Staat – Moderne Verwaltung", Das Programm der Bundesregierung, ~ (1999)
- Bohne Eberhard, "Jahrbuch des Umwelt- und Technikrechts 2011" (2011)
- Böhret, Carl, "Handbuch Gesetzesfolgenabschätzung" (2001)
- Borchert, Hartmut, "Handlungsspielräume der Verwaltung" (1999)
- Brennecke, Volker, "Frühe Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung zwischen Rechtsvorschrift und Selbstregulierung", Die neue Richtlinie VDI 7000, VerwArch, ~ (2015)
- Chistian, Peter, "Finanzmarktkrise und Wirtschaftsordnungsrecht: Aufwind für den “Regulierungsstaat”", Europäisches Wirtschafts- und Steuerrecht (2009)
- Denker, Philipp, "Alternative Regulierungsansätze im Kontext der Better Regulation Agenda" (2008)
- Deregulierungskommission, "Marktöffnung und Wettbewerb" (1991)
- Döhler, Marian, "Regulierung als Konzept und Instrument moderner Staatstätigkeit", der moderne staat (2010)
- Eifert, Martin, "Grundlagen des Verwaltungsrechts, Band 1" (2012)
- Ellwein, Thomas, "Der überforderte Staat" (1994)
- Ewen, Christoph, "Bürgerdialog bei der Infrastrukturplanung: Erwartungen und Wirklichkeit" (2013)
- Fehling, Michael, "Die Zukunft des öffentlichen Sektors" (2006)
- Franzius, Claudio, "Gewährleistung im Recht" (2009)
- Franzius, Claudio, "Der Gewährleistungsstaat", Verwaltungsarchiv, 99 (2008)
- Freund, Matthias, "Infrastrukturgewährleistung in der Telekommunikation" (2002)
- Funke, Jan, "Bürokratieabbau mit Hilfe zeitlich befristeter Gesetze" (2011)
- Groth, Andy, "Kommunalrechtliche Experimentierklauseln" (2005)
- Guckelberger, Annette, "Beschleunigung von Planungs- und Genehmigungsverfahren" (1998)
- Hensel, Stephan, "Gesetzesfolgenabschätzung in der Anwendung" (2010)
- Herzog, Roman, "Der überforderte Staat" (1992)
- Hoffmann-Riem, Wolfgang, "Wirtschaft im offenen Verfassungsstaat. Festschrift für Reiner Schmidt zum 70" (2006)
- Hoffmann-Riem, "Modernisierung von Recht und Justiz" (2001)
- Hoffmann-Riem, "Staat und Steuern. Festschrift für Klaus Vogel zum 70" (2000)
- Isensee, Josef, "Gemeinwohlgefährdung und Gemeinwohlsicherung" (2004)
- Jakobs-Woltering, Peter, "Handlungsspielräume der Verwaltung" (1999)
- Jann, Werner, "Public Management – Grundlagen, Wirkungen, Kritik. Festschrift für Christoph Reichard zum 65" (2006)
- Jantz, Bastian, "Bessere Rechtsetzung durch Befristungs- und Evaluationsklauseln?" (2010)
- Kay, Inkook, "Regulierung als Erscheinungsform der Gewährleistungsverwaltung" (2013)
- Keilmann, Ulrich, "Im Dialog kommunale Standards dauerhaft hinterfragen", Innovative Verwaltung, 10 (2011)
- Kim, Hwan-Hak, "Verfahrensrechtliche Kontrolle der Gewährleistungsverwaltung" (2012)
- Klute, Jürgen, "Sozial- und Arbeitsmarktpolitik nach Hartz: fünf Jahre Hartzreformen; Bestandsaufnahme, Analysen, Perspektiven" (2008)
- Knauff, Matthias, "Gewährleistungsstaatlichkeit in Krisenzeiten: Der Gewährleistungsstaat in der Krise?", Die Öffentliche Verwaltung (2009)
- Knauff, Matthias, "Der Gewährleistungsstaat: Reform der Daseinsvorsorge" (2004)
- Krajewski, Markus, "Grundstrukturen des Rechts öffentlicher Dienstleistungen" (2011)
- Friedrich Schoch, "Gewährleistungsverwaltung: Stärkung der Privatrechtsgesellschaft?", Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht (2008)
- Kroll, Alexander, "Das Standardkosten-Modell und dessen Beitrag zum Bürokratieabbau" (2008)
- Liebscher, Thomas, "Die Regulierung der Finanzmärkte - Reformbedarf und Regelungsansätze des deutschen Gesetzgebers", Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht (2010)
- Mayntz, Renate, "Politische Theorien in der Ära der Transformation" (1996)
- OECD, "Bessere Rechtsetzung in Europa – Deutschland", ~ (2010)
- Pahlow, Louis, "Bankenregulierung zur Stärkung der Krisenprävention?", Der Staat, 50 (2011)
- Picot, Arnold, "10 Jahre wettbewerbsorientierte Regulierung von Netzindustrien in Deutschland" (2008)
- Pitschas, Rainer, "Verwaltungsverantwortung und Verwaltungsverfahren" (1990)
- Proeller, Isabella, "Handbuch zur Verwaltungsreform" (2005)
- Reidenbach, Michael, "Kommunale Standards in der Diskussion" (1996)
- Ruffert, "Regulierungsrecht" (2010)
- Schmidt-Aßmann, Eberhard, "Regulierte Selbstregulierung als Element verwaltungsrechtlicher Systembildung", Die Verwaltung, Beih, 4 (2001)
- Saladin, Peter, "Verantwortung als Staatsprinzip" (1984)
- Schuppert, Gunnar Folke, "Der Gewährleistungsstaat – Ein Leitbild auf dem Prüfstand" (2005)
- Schuppert, Gunnar Folke, "Gemeinwohl – Auf der Suche nach Substanz" (2002)
- Schuppert, Gunnar Folke, "Das Konzept der regulierten Selbstregulierung als Bestandteil einerals Regelungswissenschaft verstandenen Rechtswissenschaft", Die Verwaltung, Beih, 4 (2001)
- Schuppert, Gunnar Folke, "Governance und Rechtsetzung" (2001)
- Schuppert, Gunnar Folke, "Verwaltungswissenschaft" (2000)
- Schuppert, Gunnar Folke, "Die öffentliche Verwaltung im Kooperationsspektrum staatlicher und privater Aufgabenerfüllung: Zum Denken in Verantwortungsstufen", Die Verwaltung, 31 (1998)
- Schwab, Joachim, "Frühe Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung und behördliche Genehmigungsverfahren", Umwelt- und Planungsrecht (2014)
- Sicko, Corinna, "Risiko im Recht –Recht im Risiko" (2011)
- Smeddinck, Ulrich, "Der Nudge-Ansatz – eine Möglichkeit, wirksam zu regieren)", Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik (2014)
- Thaler, Richard H., "Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness" (2008)
- Thoma, Christian, "Regulierte Selbstregulierung im Ordnungsverwaltungsrecht" (2008)
- Trute, Hans-Heinrich, "Jenseits von Privatisierung und »schlankem« Staat" (1999)
- Voßkuhle, Andreas, "Voßkuhle, Beteiligung Privater an öffentlichen Aufgaben und staatliche Verantwortung", Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer, 62 (2003)
- Waechter, Kay, "Verwaltungsrecht im Gewährleistungsstaat" (2008)
- Windthorst, Kay, "Der Universaldienst im Bereich der Telekommunikation" (2000)
- Wollenschläger, Bernward, "Effektive staatliche Rückholoptionen bei gesellschaftlicher Schlechterfüllung" (2006)
- Wyduckel, Dieter, "The reasonable as rational? On legal argumentation and justification, Festschrift for Aulis Aarnio" (2000)
- Ziekow, Jan, "Öffentliches Wirtschaftsrecht" (2013)
- Ziekow, Jan, "Piesker, Axel, Die Planung und Durchführung von Gesetzesevaluationenen", wEin Leitfaden (2013)
- Ziekow, Jan, "Legislative Impact Assessment for Regulatory Reform: Achievements and Prospects" (2013)
- Ziekow, Jan, "Frühe Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung – Der Beginn einer neuen Verwaltungskultur", Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht (2013)
- Ziekow, Jan, "Neue Formen der Bürgerbeteiligung? Planung und Zulassung von Projekten in der parlamentarischen Demokratie", Gutachten D zum 69. Deutschen Juristentag, ~ (2012)
- Ziekow, Jan, "Die Konkretisierung des Gemeinwohls durch Staat und Private (japanisch), in: Handai Hogaku", Osaka Law Review, 59(1) (2009)
- Ziekow, Jan, "Dauer von Zulassungsverfahren. Eine empirische Untersuchung zu Implementation und Wirkungsgrad von Regelungen zur Verfahrensbeschleunigung" (2005)
- Ziekow, Jan, "Internationalisierung von Staat und Verfassung im Spiegel des deutschen und japanischen Staats- und Verwaltungsrechts" (2002)
- Ziekow, Jan, "Verankerung verwaltungs- rechtlicher Kooperationsverhältnisse (Public Private Partnership) im Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz" (2001)
- Ziekow, Jan, "Neuausrichtung kommunaler Dienstleistungen" (1999)
- Ziekow, Jan, "Über Freizügigkeit und Aufenthalt" (1997)