台灣對管制規範的改革—以對電子媒體核發臨時執照的運用為核心
Regulatory Reform in Taiwan: Focusing on the Temporary Operation License of Media
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
For the purposes of legal norms, all regulations are to overall efficiency, but excessive regulation will be mutual interference as to obstruct efficiency. The regulatory reform has become a responsibility of guarantor state. But for the fair competition or maintenance of social diversity shall be means special permission of regulation, this is the concerns of economic administrative law and Fair Trade Act. In particular, for regulation of electronic media involves freedom of expression and make it easier for controversial issue. In July 2005 Taiwan’s Government unprecedentedly rejected seven satellite broadcasting and television operator's application for the renewal of the operation license. At the time it caused much controversy. In support of the rule of law and procedures, which has a certain worth exploring. How to avoid producing all or none as a result of regulation, traditionally mainly to make administrative disposition with the incidental provision of agrees to the application licensing, mostly is the "conditions" or "burden" manner. But this way is not without controversy, in particular administrative discretion often become the focus of controversy. In 2007 the Cable Radio and Television Act amendments to new articles 35-1, it is creation of the "temporary operation license” as a new models of regulation. The regulatory reform is also as a responses of controversy in 2005. The temporary operation license could replace direct refused to apply for the renewal of the operation license, and also can be replaced by making a provisional injunction of Administrative Court. More importantly, the temporary operation license created the regulatory measures for the time foresee the possibility, this is the lack of the administrative disposition with incidental provision by the advantages. After all the purpose of regulation to public interests. At the same time how to balance the rights of the applicant of operation license, the temporary operation license should be the greatest common divisor.
Abstract
For the purposes of legal norms, all regulations are to overall efficiency, but excessive regulation will be mutual interference as to obstruct efficiency. The regulatory reform has become a responsibility of guarantor state. But for the fair competition or maintenance of social diversity shall be means special permission of regulation, this is the concerns of economic administrative law and Fair Trade Act. In particular, for regulation of electronic media involves freedom of expression and make it easier for controversial issue. In July 2005 Taiwan’s Government unprecedentedly rejected seven satellite broadcasting and television operator's application for the renewal of the operation license. At the time it caused much controversy. In support of the rule of law and procedures, which has a certain worth exploring. How to avoid producing all or none as a result of regulation, traditionally mainly to make administrative disposition with the incidental provision of agrees to the application licensing, mostly is the "conditions" or "burden" manner. But this way is not without controversy, in particular administrative discretion often become the focus of controversy. In 2007 the Cable Radio and Television Act amendments to new articles 35-1, it is creation of the "temporary operation license” as a new models of regulation. The regulatory reform is also as a responses of controversy in 2005. The temporary operation license could replace direct refused to apply for the renewal of the operation license, and also can be replaced by making a provisional injunction of Administrative Court. More importantly, the temporary operation license created the regulatory measures for the time foresee the possibility, this is the lack of the administrative disposition with incidental provision by the advantages. After all the purpose of regulation to public interests. At the same time how to balance the rights of the applicant of operation license, the temporary operation license should be the greatest common divisor.
참고문헌 (14)
- 李建良, "行政法 下冊" (2006)
- 法治斌, "憲法新論" (2005)
- 林紀東, "中華民國憲法釋論" (1993)
- 林紀東, "中華民國憲法逐條釋論" (1987)
- 郭明政, "社會安全制度與社會法" (1997)
- 許宗力, "從社會補償看關廠歇業失業勞工案的法律問題", 台灣法學雜誌, (236) (2013)
- 陳 敏, "行政法總論" (2012)
- 陳新民, "行政法學總論" (2006)
- 陳新民, "憲法學釋論" (2011)
- 劉慶瑞, "中華民國憲法要義" (1989)
- 謝瀛洲, "中華民國憲法論" (1963)
- 薛化元, "民主憲政與民族主義的辯證發展—張君勱思想研究" (1993)
- Gitter, "Sozialrecht" (2001)
- Rüfner, Wolfgang, "Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht" (1998)
