지역기업을 위한 정부지원사업의 성과분석과 개선방안
A Study on Improvement Plans through Performance Analysis of Government Support Program for Regional Firms
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, the effectiveness of government support program was defined as the difference of performance between participating and non-participating firms of the program. Also, the study suggested improvement plans enhancing the effectiveness of government support program through reviewing previous research(qualitative analysis) and empirical testing(quantitative analysis) on the performance of the program. We suggested improvement plans in two dimensions(responsible parties and the process for government support program). In the dimension of responsible parties, we suggested building total control system for national R&D program and enhancing innovative capacity of regional firms. In detail, we recommended ① performance-based allocation of R&D resources, ② systematizing performance management through reestablishing the policy direction and objective of the program, ③ building total control system for national R&D program, ④ expanding and consolidating R&D program for regional firms, ⑤ establishment of regional innovation network for reinforcing entrepreneurship, ⑥ the sense of responsibility for research fund, performance management and commercialization. Improvement plans in other dimensions were reinforcing survey-analysis-evaluation of government support program and evidence-based policy for regional R&D. Also, systematizing performance management and analysis through life-cycle and continuous monitoring and tracking management were suggested. In the process for government support program, detailed plans were ① reinforcing planning using statistical analysis for customized support program, ② building database for virtuous circle of regional R&D policy, ③ systematizing performance management and analysis through life-cycle and continuous monitoring and tracking management, ④ developing and adopting value index measuring interior capability and risk-taking tendency.
Abstract
In this study, the effectiveness of government support program was defined as the difference of performance between participating and non-participating firms of the program. Also, the study suggested improvement plans enhancing the effectiveness of government support program through reviewing previous research(qualitative analysis) and empirical testing(quantitative analysis) on the performance of the program. We suggested improvement plans in two dimensions(responsible parties and the process for government support program). In the dimension of responsible parties, we suggested building total control system for national R&D program and enhancing innovative capacity of regional firms. In detail, we recommended ① performance-based allocation of R&D resources, ② systematizing performance management through reestablishing the policy direction and objective of the program, ③ building total control system for national R&D program, ④ expanding and consolidating R&D program for regional firms, ⑤ establishment of regional innovation network for reinforcing entrepreneurship, ⑥ the sense of responsibility for research fund, performance management and commercialization. Improvement plans in other dimensions were reinforcing survey-analysis-evaluation of government support program and evidence-based policy for regional R&D. Also, systematizing performance management and analysis through life-cycle and continuous monitoring and tracking management were suggested. In the process for government support program, detailed plans were ① reinforcing planning using statistical analysis for customized support program, ② building database for virtuous circle of regional R&D policy, ③ systematizing performance management and analysis through life-cycle and continuous monitoring and tracking management, ④ developing and adopting value index measuring interior capability and risk-taking tendency.
참고문헌 (21)
- 강기춘, "지역산업기술개발사업이 참여기업의 성과에 미치는 효과 분석", 한국지역경제연구, 11(3), pp.23~43 (2013), 한국지역경제학회
- 곽수환, "제조업과 서비스업의 기술혁신 결정요인 비교", 서비스경영학회지, 11(2), pp.259~283 (2010), 한국서비스경영학회
- 국가과학기술심의회, "2015년도 정부연구개발투자 방향 및 기준(안)", ~ (2014)
- 정부 R&D 보조금의 기업성과에 대한 효과 분석, "김기완", KDI, ~ (2008)
- 김승호, "경영자 혁신DNA와 기술혁신", 한국창업학회지, 10(1), pp.1~25 (2015), 한국창업학회
- 지역산업정책 10년의 성과와 과제: 지역산업진흥사업을 중심으로, "김영수", 산업연구원, ~ (2007)
- 구개발투자에 대한 조세지원제도의 효과 분석, "김학수", 한국경제연구원, ~ (2007)
- 김현아, "재정관점에서의 지역발전정책 효과성 제고 방안", 재정포럼 (2014)
- 대구정책기획단, "대구지역 유관기관 담당자 대상 애로사항 및 개선사항 설문조사", ~ (2010)
- 신진교, "중소기업의 기술혁신 결정요인에 관한 실증연구", 기업경영연구, 16(4), pp.1~23 (2009), 한국기업경영학회
- 신진교, "중소기업의 R&D와 혁신 - 정부정책지원의 조절효과 -", 기업경영연구, 15(1), pp.119~132 (2008), 한국기업경영학회
- 윤윤규, "정부 R&D지원이 기업의 성과에 미치는 효과 분석: 동남권 지역산업진흥사업을 중심으로", 기술혁신연구, 19(1), pp.29~54 (2011), 기술경영경제학회
- 한국벤처캐피탈 투자행태에 관한 실증분석, "이경원", 정보통신정책연구원, ~ (2002)
- 이병헌, "벤처기업의 성장단계별 기술혁신 전략과 정부의 R&D 지원 효과", 기업가정신과 벤처연구, 8(2), pp.127~152 (2005), 한국중소기업학회
- 지역산업 육성 지원제도의 개편방안, "정종석", 산업연구원, ~ (2011)
- 기업에 대한 정부 R&D 투자지원의 정책효과 분석 연구, "최대승", KISTEP, ~ (2014)
- 한국산업기술평가원, "R&D투자 지원․미지원 기업 간 성과 비교분석", ~ (2006)
- 한국산업기술진흥원, "지역산업육성사업 정책효과 분석 결과", ~ (2012)
- 홍지승, "중소기업의 기술혁신 동인 분석과 시사점", 산업경제 분석, ~ (2010)
- Panne, G., "Success and failure of innovation : A literature review", International Journal of Innovation Management, 7(3), pp.309~338 (2003)
- Jaruzelski, B., "Money isn't everything", Strategy+Business, 41(Winter) (2005)
