본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

우리나라 창업정책의 효율성 분석 : 혁신주도형 경제권 국가와의 비교를 중심으로

An Analysis on Relative Efficiency of Korean Entrepreneurship Policy: based on comparison with innovation-driven economies

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this study is to analyze the relative efficiency of Korean entrepreneurship policy based on comparison with innovation-driven economies, and suggest policy implications. The study applies an input-based DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) model to nine countries out of the innovation-driven economies in order to measure the relative efficiencies for their entrepreneurship policy during the period 2009-2013. Four input factors include the Financial Support, Government Policy, Research and Development Transfer, and Commercial, Professional Infrastructure. Single output factor is Total Early-stage Entrepreneurial Activity. The results can be summarized as follows; First, technical efficiencies have been increasing throughout the analysis period while the majority of the countries were located under increasing returns to scale. Second, scale inefficiencies turn out to be greater than managerial inefficiencies. Third, the increases in output-based Malmquist productivity indexes were caused mainly by technological changes rather than technical efficiency changes. Last, according to DEA/Window analysis, average of window-wise technical efficiencies has been increasing during three-window period. Based on the analyses results, the study suggests three policy implications. First, the countries in the innovation-driven economies need to increase the input factors for entrepreneurship policy. Second, relatively inefficient countries need to catch up the reference countries by the way of benchmarking. Last, Korean government may as well pursue an effectiveness-oriented entrepreneurship policy rather than an efficiency-oriented one.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the relative efficiency of Korean entrepreneurship policy based on comparison with innovation-driven economies, and suggest policy implications. The study applies an input-based DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) model to nine countries out of the innovation-driven economies in order to measure the relative efficiencies for their entrepreneurship policy during the period 2009-2013. Four input factors include the Financial Support, Government Policy, Research and Development Transfer, and Commercial, Professional Infrastructure. Single output factor is Total Early-stage Entrepreneurial Activity. The results can be summarized as follows; First, technical efficiencies have been increasing throughout the analysis period while the majority of the countries were located under increasing returns to scale. Second, scale inefficiencies turn out to be greater than managerial inefficiencies. Third, the increases in output-based Malmquist productivity indexes were caused mainly by technological changes rather than technical efficiency changes. Last, according to DEA/Window analysis, average of window-wise technical efficiencies has been increasing during three-window period. Based on the analyses results, the study suggests three policy implications. First, the countries in the innovation-driven economies need to increase the input factors for entrepreneurship policy. Second, relatively inefficient countries need to catch up the reference countries by the way of benchmarking. Last, Korean government may as well pursue an effectiveness-oriented entrepreneurship policy rather than an efficiency-oriented one.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 관계부처 합동, "벤처․창업 자금생태계 선순환 방안", ~ (2013)
  2. 관계부처 합동, "창조경제를 견인할 창의인재 육성 방안", ~ (2013)
  3. 김건위, "DEA기법 적용상의 유의점에 관한 연구: 지방행정분야를 중심으로", 지방행정연구, 19(3), pp.213~244 (2005), 한국지방행정연구원
  4. 김성국, "DEA에 의한 우리나라 멀티플렉스 산업의 효율성 분석", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 6(7), pp.111~118 (2006), 한국콘텐츠학회
  5. 김완민, "기술집약형 창업 활성화를 위한 대학의 역할", 대한경영학회지, 18(5), pp.2079~2106 (2005), 대한경영학회
  6. 김창범, "아시아 지역의 에너지소비 효율성 분석", 무역통상학회지, 10(1), pp.21~32 (2010), 한국무역통상학회[DOI]
  7. 반성식, "한국의 기업가정신 활동: 2012년 글로벌기업가정신연구(GEM)를 중심으로", 한국창업학회지, 8(3), pp.27~56 (2013), 한국창업학회
  8. 글로벌기업가정신연구(GEM) 2013 연구보고서, "반성식", (사)한국글로벌기업가정신연구원, 경남과학기술대학교, ~ (2014)
  9. 창업지원정책의 추진실태와 개선방안, "양현봉", 경제․인문사회연구회, ~ (2013)
  10. 윤경준, "지방정부 직영기업의 상대적 효율성 평가 : 도시 상수도 사업에 대한 Data Envelopment Analysis", 한국행정연구, 5(4), pp.119~139 (1996)
  11. 이만석, "전문대학의 효율성과 생산성에 관한 연구", 무역통상학회지, 10(1), pp.33~59 (2010), 한국무역통상학회[DOI]
  12. 이정동, "효율성 분석이론: DEA 자료포락분석법" (2012), ㈜지필미디어
  13. 林石珉, "公共部門의 效率性에 관한 연구 : DEA기법을 통한 相對的 效率性 側定", 석사, 경제학, pp.1997
  14. 임동진, "DEA를 통한 지방정부의 생산성 측정 : 인력․재정과 공공서비스의 관계를 중심으로", 한국행정학보, 34(4), pp.217~234 (2000)
  15. 장철호, "DEA", Window와 Malmquist 생산성지수를 이용한 효율성 분석 : 농수산물공영도매시장을 중심으로, 2008, pp.35(4), 778~808[DOI]
  16. 조종현, "창업보육센터의 특성이 입주기업 경영성과에 미치는 영향", 회계연구, 13(3), pp.51~78 (2008), 대한회계학회
  17. 국내 창업정책의 변화 및 평가, "한국벤처창업학회", 창업진흥원, ~ (2013)
  18. Anokhin, S., "Operationalizing opportunities in entrepreneurship research : use of data envelopment analysis", Small Business Economics, 37(1), pp.39~57 (2011)
  19. Schwab, K., "Global Competitiveness Report 2009-2010", World Economic Forum (2009)
  20. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2012 Global Report, "Xavier, S. R.", GEM, ~ (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)