본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

억제통제훈련이 도박행동에 미치는 영향

Effects of Inhibitory Control Training on Gambling Behavior

윤혜영|김동환
한국임상심리학회 (Korean Clinical Psychology Association)|2022.12|한국심리학회지: 임상심리 연구와 실제 (Clinical Psychology in Korea: Research and Practice)|제8권 제4호|pp. 637-658|DOI http://doi.org/10.15842/CPKJOURNAL.PUB.8.4.637

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

gambling behavior도박행동도박문제반응억제inhibitory controlgambling problem억제통제훈련inhibition control training

초록

본 연구에서는 문제성 도박자들을 대상으로 억제통제훈련을 실시하고, 이러한 훈련이 반응억제수준과 도박행동의 변화에 미치는 영향을 확인하였다. 참가자는 불법 온라인 도박 게임인 파워볼이나 사다리게임 경험이 있으며 한국판 캐나다 문제도박지수(Korean-Canadian Problem Gambling Index, K-CPGI) 척도에서 3점 이상을 기록한 만 18세 이상 성인 20명이었다. 참가자는 각각 훈련집단 도박NoGo(n = 10)과 통제집단 도박Go(n = 10)에 무작위 할당 되었다. 억제통제훈련 전후로 멈춤신호 과제(SST, Logan, Schachar, & Tannock. 1997)와 슬롯머신 게임(AllJ slots 2.2)을 실시하여 참가자들의 반응억제 능력과 도박행동을 측정하였다. 훈련집단(도박NoGo 조건)에서는 도박자극이 제시될 때 반응을 하지 않다가 중립자극이 제시될 때 반응을 하도록 억제통제훈련을 실시하였고, 통제집단(도박Go 조건)에서는 반대로 훈련하였다. 연구결과, 억제통제훈련 처치 후 훈련집단이 통제집단에 비해 반응억제 능력이 유의하게 증가하였고 도박게임횟수가 유의하게 감소하였다. 이러한 결과는 억제통제훈련이 문제성 도박자들의 반응억제수준과 도박행동에 영향을 줄 수 있음을 시사한다. 마지막으로, 본 연구의 한계점과 후속연구를 위한 제언이 논의되었다.

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the effect of inhibitory control training on the inhibitory control and gambling behavior of problem gamblers. The participants were 20 adults over the age of 18 with experience in Powerball and ladder games, namely illegal online gambling games who scored three or higher on the Korean version of the Canadian Problem Gambling Index (K-CPGI). Participants were randomly assigned to the training group (Gambling NoGo, n=10) or the control group (Gambling Go, n=10). The participants’ inhibitory control and gambling behavior were measured before and after inhibitory control training with a stop signal task (SST) and a slot machine game (AllJ slots 2.2), respectively. The training group (Gambling no go condition) received inhibitory control training to not react when a gambling stimulus was presented and react when a neutral stimulus was presented, whereas the control group (Gambling go condition) received reverse training. Results indicated that after training, inhibitory control increased in the training group compared to the control group. In addition, there was a significant decrease in the gambling frequency of the training group compared to the control group. These results suggest that inhibitory control training may affect the inhibition ability and gambling behavior of problem gamblers. The limitations of this study and suggestions for future research are discussed in the paper.

참고문헌 (58)

  1. 김경진, "문제성 도박의 발달 및 회복과 관련된 성격요인 탐색", 한국심리학회지: 건강, 24(3), pp.735~751 (2019), 한국건강심리학회[DOI]
  2. "조합비 7천 500만원 빼돌려 도박 등에 쓴 노조 간부 실형" (2021)[URL]
  3. 김아영, "CPGI의 한국판 제작 및 타당화", 한국심리학회지:일반, 30(4), pp.1011~1038 (2011), 한국심리학회
  4. 코로나19와 도박문제 요약보고서, "김용석", 한국도박문제관리센터, ~ (2021)
  5. 제4차 불법도박 실태조사, "사행산업통합감독위원회", 사행산업통합감독위원회, ~ (2019)
  6. 2020 사행산업 이용실태조사, "사행산업통합감독위원회", 사행산업통합감독위원회, ~ (2020)
  7. 2021 사행산업 이용실태조사, "사행산업통합감독위원회", 사행산업통합감독위원회, ~ (2021)
  8. 서명교, "다차원적 충동성과 도박 동기가 도박 문제에 미치는 영향 : 유사 도박경험의 조절된 매개효과", 석사, pp.2020
  9. 서상범, "평가적 조건화가 도박에 대한 태도와 도박행동 변화에 미치는 영향", 석사, pp.2019
  10. 양국희, "비합리적 도박신념 및 타인의 승리에 대한 정보가 도박행동에 미치는 영향", 석사, 심리학과, pp.2012
  11. 임자영, "승리 접근 경험이 도박 행동에 미치는 영향", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28(2), pp.379~393 (2009), 한국임상심리학회[DOI]
  12. 정성훈, "충동성과 우연-기술수준에 대한 지각 및 빅-윈(Big-win)의 유무가 도박 행동에 미치는 영향", 석사, 심리학, pp.2011
  13. "통계" (2021)[URL]
  14. "“암 걸렸어, 돈 좀” 지인 30명에 받은 29억 도박 탕진한 30대" (2021)[URL]
  15. Adams, S., "Resisting the urge to smoke: inhibitory control training in cigarette smokers", Royal Society Open Science, 4(8), pp.1~7 (2017)
  16. Alcorn, J. L., "A pilot investigation of acute inhibitory control training in cocaine users", Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 174(1), pp.145~149 (2017)
  18. Allom, V., "Does inhibitory control training improve health behaviour: A meta-analysis", Health Psychology Review, 10(2), pp.168~186 (2016)
  19. American Psychiatric Association, "Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders(DSM-5)" (2013), American Psychiatric Association
  20. Bari, A., "Inhibition and impulsivity: Behavioral and neural basis of response control", Progress in Neurobiology, 108(1), pp.44~79 (2013)
  21. Bowley, C., "The effects of inhibitory control training on alcohol consumption, implicit alcohol related cognitions and brain electrical activity", International Journal of Psychophyisiology, 89(3), pp.342~348 (2013)
  22. Brevers, D., "Impulsive action but not impulsive choice determines problem gambling severity", Plos One, 7(11), pp.e50647~ (2012)
  23. Chamberlain, S. R., "The neuropsychiatry of impulsivity", Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 20(3), pp.255~261 (2007)
  24. Chowdhury, N. S., "Pathological gambling and motor impulsivity: a systematic review with meta-analysis", Journal of Gambling Studies, 33(4), pp.1213~1239 (2017)
  25. Crews, F. T., "Impulsivity, frontal lobes and risk for addiction", Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 93(3), pp.237~247 (2009)
  26. Dixon, M. R., "Near-miss effects on response latencies and win estimation of slot machine players", The Psychological Record, 54(3), pp.335~348 (2004)
  27. The Canadian problem gambling index, "Ferris, J. A.", Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse, 1~59 (2001)
  28. Field, M., "Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: A review of its development, causes, and consequences", Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 97(1-2), pp.1~20 (2008)
  29. Franken, I. H., "Drug craving and addiction: integrating psychological and neuropsychopharmacological approaches", Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 27(4), pp.563~579 (2003)
  30. Fuentes, D., "Self-reported and neuropsychological measures of impulsivity in pathological gambling", Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12(6), pp.907~912 (2006)
  31. Gao, Q., "Inhibitory control in excessive social networking users: Evidence from an ERP-based Go-Nogo task", Frontiers in Psychology, 10, pp.1810~ (2019)
  32. Goldstein, R. Z., "Dysfunction of the prefrontal cortex in addiction: neuroimaging findings and clinical implications", Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12(11), pp.652~669 (2011)
  33. Goudriaan, A. E., "Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling: A comparison with alcohol dependence, Tourette syndrome and normal controls", Addiction, 101(4), pp.534~547 (2006)
  34. Goudriaan, A. E., "The role of self-reported impulsivity and reward sensitivity versus neurocognitive measures of disinhibition and decision-making in the prediction of relapse in pathological gamblers", Psychological Medicine, 38(1), pp.41~50 (2008)
  35. Houben, K., "Getting a grip on drinking behavior: Training working memory to reduce alcoholabuse", Psychological Science, 22(7), pp.968~975 (2011)
  36. Houben, K., "Beer à No-Go: Learning to stop responding to alcohol cues reduces alcohol intake via reduced affective associations rather than increased response inhibition", Addiction, 107(7), pp.1280~1287 (2012)
  37. Houben, K., "Chocolate equals stop: Chocolate-specific inhibition training reduces chocolate intake and go associations with chocolate", Appetite, 87, pp.318~323 (2015)
  38. Jones, A., "Inhibitory control training for appetitive behaviour change: A meta- analytic investigation of mechanisms of action and moderators of effectiveness", Appetite, 97, pp.16~28 (2016)
  39. Jones, A., "The effects of cue-specific inhibition training on alcohol consumption in heavy social drinkers", Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 21(1), pp.8~16 (2013)
  40. Kertzman, S., "Go-no-go performance in pathological gamblers", Psychiarty Research, 161(1), pp.1~10 (2008)
  41. Lawrence, N. S., "Stopping to food can reduce intake. Effects of stimulus-specificity and individual differences in dietary restraint", Appetite, 85, pp.91~103 (2015)
  42. Le, T. M., "Problem drinking and the interaction of reward, negative emotion, and cognitive control circuits during cue-elicited craving", Addiction Neuroscience, 1, pp.100004~ (2022)
  43. Leeman, R. F., "Similarities and differences between pathological gambling and substance use disorders: A ocus on impulsivity and compulsivity", Psychopharmacology, 219(2), pp.469~490 (2012)
  44. Logan, G. D., "Impulsivity and inhibitory control", American Psychological Society, 8(1), pp.60~84 (1997)
  45. Mostofsky, S. H., "Response inhibition and response selection: Two sides of the same coin", Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(5), pp.751~761 (2008)
  46. Noël, X., "A neurocognitive approach to understanding the neurobiology of addiction", Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 23(4), pp.632~638 (2013)
  47. Olmstead, M. C., "Animal models of drug addiction: where do we go from here?", Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(4), pp.625~653 (2006)
  48. Schoenmakers, T., "Clinical effectiveness of attentional bias modification training in abstinent alcoholic patients", Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 109(1-3), pp.30~36 (2010)
  49. Scholes-Balog, K. E., "Problem gambling patterns among Australian young adults: Associations with prospective risk and protective factors and adult adjustment outcomes", Addictive Behaviors, 55, pp.38~45 (2016)
  50. Spierer, L., "Training-induced behavioral and brain plasticity in inhibitory control", Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, pp.427~ (2013)
  51. van Holst, R. J., "Why gamblers fail to win: A review of cognitive and neuroimaging findings in pathological gambling", Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(1), pp.87~107 (2010)
  52. van Koningsbruggen, G. M., "Comparing two psychological interventions in reducing impulsive processes of eating behaviour: Effects on self‐selected portion size", British Journal of Health Psychology, 19(4), pp.767~782 (2013)
  53. Veling, H., "Using stop signals to reduce impulsive choices for palatable unhealthy foods", British Journal of Health Psychology, 18(2), pp.354~368 (2013)
  54. Verbruggen, F., "Are the Effects of Response Inhibition on Gambling Long-Lasting?", Plos One, 8(7), pp.e70155~ (2013)
  55. Verbruggen, F., "Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm", Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), pp.418~424 (2008)
  56. Welte, J. W., "Gambling participation in the US-results from a national survey", Journal of Gambling Studies, 18(4), pp.313~337 (2002)
  57. Wiers, R. W., "Cognitive bias modification and cognitive control training in addiction and related psychopathology: Mechanisms, clinical perspectives, and ways forward", Clinical Psychological Science, 1(2), pp.192~212 (2013)
  58. Wittekind, C. E., "Cognitive bias modification in problem and pathological gambling using a web-based approach- avoidance task: A pilot trial", Psychiatry Research, 272, pp.171~181 (2019)

관련 논문AI추천

도박 중독 취약성과 억제 능력의 결함김영주, 이인혜한국건강심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 건강2010 · 제15권 제4호억제기능 결함과 도박중독의 관계 : 카지노 도박중독자들을 중심으로강성군, 김영주, 이인혜한국건강심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 건강2011 · 제16권 제3호비임상집단에서 충동성과 우연-기술수준에 대한 지각 및 Big-win의 유/무가 도박 행동에 미치는 영향곽호완, 구본훈, 장문선, 정성훈한국건강심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 건강2012 · 제17권 제4호승리 접근 경험이 도박 행동에 미치는 영향임자영, 현명호한국임상심리학회 · Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology2009 · 제28권 제2호도박 게임의 승․패에 따른 각성 수준과 배팅 액의 변화: 충동성의 중재효과를 중심으로이인혜, 황현국한국건강심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 건강2009 · 제14권 제2호자기 통제 훈련 프로그램이 온라인 게임 중독 대학생들의 게임 중독 수준, 공격성 및 충동성에 미치는 효과손정락, 최오영한국임상심리학회 · Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology2011 · 제30권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

대학생의 아동기 정서학대와 정서방임의 경험과 우울 증상 간의 관계에서 정서조절능력의 차별적인 매개효과전선영, 김은정pp. 559-588주도성과 친화성 특성에 따른 병리적 자기애의 암묵적․명시적 자존감장문선, 임종민, 전유겸pp. 589-613아동기 및 성인 ADHD 증상에 따른 대학생 OCD 집단의 실행기능 결함, 우울 및 불안의 차이김선주pp. 615-635코로나 19 스트레스 척도(COVID Stress Scales, CSS)의 타당화: 한국 성인표본을 대상으로지은혜, 조용래, 김선영pp. 659-681한국판 실존불안 질문지 타당화 및 관련 변인 탐색현명호, 강규림pp. 683-711
원문 보기