韩国学生使用量词调查分析
The Investigation and Analysis of Korean Students to use Classifiers
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper through the collection of Korean students' actual corpora, analyzes the students' use of modern Chinese classifier, found that students using the classifiers have several characteristics as follows: (1) The use of classifiers are few in number, only a few dozen, far less than the total number of measure words in modern Chinese, the student of primary level and advanced level students in the selection of quantifiers, focused on the classifiers and concrete noun collocation, abstract nouns are not sensitive to; (2) Students universal widely use quantifier "pan", which is used of high frequency, relative frequency is very high; (3) In the example of leakage using classifiers, nearly half were missed using classifiers between the demonstratives pronoun "this" (or "that") and the noun; (4) When students use of classifiers, they do not know what classifier should be used according to the specific language environment, and do not know the correct position of the classifiers, especially the verbal classifiers. Overall the investigation results, the accuracy of senior level students using the classifier was generally better than that of primary level students, but the results also show that senior level students in the learning of new knowledge while forgetting of previously learning, so it prompt teachers, in the teaching, should summarize classifiers using rules, let the student not only studying new classifiers but also reviewing used classifiers. Because the author collected corpus analysis level is limited, finite, cannot say the results of these analyses covers Korean students using quantifiers everything, but I believe that it is a good try, to a certain extent, can reflect the Korean students of modern Chinese classifiers and errors, for future teaching to provide some reference.
Abstract
This paper through the collection of Korean students' actual corpora, analyzes the students' use of modern Chinese classifier, found that students using the classifiers have several characteristics as follows: (1) The use of classifiers are few in number, only a few dozen, far less than the total number of measure words in modern Chinese, the student of primary level and advanced level students in the selection of quantifiers, focused on the classifiers and concrete noun collocation, abstract nouns are not sensitive to; (2) Students universal widely use quantifier "pan", which is used of high frequency, relative frequency is very high; (3) In the example of leakage using classifiers, nearly half were missed using classifiers between the demonstratives pronoun "this" (or "that") and the noun; (4) When students use of classifiers, they do not know what classifier should be used according to the specific language environment, and do not know the correct position of the classifiers, especially the verbal classifiers. Overall the investigation results, the accuracy of senior level students using the classifier was generally better than that of primary level students, but the results also show that senior level students in the learning of new knowledge while forgetting of previously learning, so it prompt teachers, in the teaching, should summarize classifiers using rules, let the student not only studying new classifiers but also reviewing used classifiers. Because the author collected corpus analysis level is limited, finite, cannot say the results of these analyses covers Korean students using quantifiers everything, but I believe that it is a good try, to a certain extent, can reflect the Korean students of modern Chinese classifiers and errors, for future teaching to provide some reference.
참고문헌 (12)
- 郭先珍, "现代汉语量词用法词典" (2008), 语文出版社
- 吕叔湘, "现代汉语八百词 增定本" (2007), 商务印书馆
- 中国社会科学院语言所词典编辑室, "现代汉语词典 第五版" (2010), 商务印书馆
- 盛炎, "语言教学原理" (1990), 重庆出版社
- 刘洵, "对外汉语教育引论" (2000), 北京语言大学出版社
- 吕文华, "对外汉语教学语法初探 增定本" (2008), 北京语言大学出版社
- 吕必松, "论汉语中介语的研究", 语言文字应用, (2) (1993)
- 沈怀兴, "量词"位"的泛用", 河南师范大学学报, (1) (2001)
- 黄佩文, "切忌量词"位"的滥用", 汉语学习, (2) (2002)
- 鲁健驥, "中介语言理论和外国人学汉语的偏误分析", 语言教学与研究, (3) (1984)
- 金珍我, "汉语和韩语量词比较", 世界汉语教学, (2) (2002)
- 赵金铭, "能扩展的"动名"格式讨论", 语言教学与研究 (1984)
