TEAMS 비행위험성 진단체계 평가규준 개발에 관한 연구
The study to develop norms of TEAMS delinquency risk assessment system
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study has been conducted to draw up quantitative delinquency risk assesment standards of TEAMS(Total Education and Management System) delinquency risk assessment system, and to verify the validity. From Aug. 2008 to Jul. 2010, 8,823 cases out of 11,921 juvenile classification cases in all juvenile classification offices were selected to an object of study. The procedure of this study is as in the following. First, restructured assessment factors and reset weights of the factors through factorial analysis. Numbers of low factors increased from 18 to 27, rank-order of weights among assessment scores changed, and deviation among weights decreased. Second, developed standardized norms by calculating average and standard deviation of each groups to compare each factor scores. Third, established the level of delinquency risk by calculating average readmit rate of the juvenile classification office. Forth, verified validity of this assessment system. The convergent validity was good because corelation among 8 diagnosis area scores was statistically significant. The discrimination validity was also good because assessment scores of validity group(expected lower delinquency risk level) were statistically significantly lower than those of norm group(expected higher delinquency risk level). But prediction validity was not good because corelation between 8diagnosis area scores and remediation score was not statistically markedly significant. According to this study, must be reflect this study result on TEAMS to make use of the assessment system in real business,prepare institutional base to describe assessment scores to investigation report, develop relative education contents for hands-on workers to make the best use of this assessment system, and perform follow up study to strengthen reliability and validity of assessment system.
Abstract
This study has been conducted to draw up quantitative delinquency risk assesment standards of TEAMS(Total Education and Management System) delinquency risk assessment system, and to verify the validity. From Aug. 2008 to Jul. 2010, 8,823 cases out of 11,921 juvenile classification cases in all juvenile classification offices were selected to an object of study. The procedure of this study is as in the following. First, restructured assessment factors and reset weights of the factors through factorial analysis. Numbers of low factors increased from 18 to 27, rank-order of weights among assessment scores changed, and deviation among weights decreased. Second, developed standardized norms by calculating average and standard deviation of each groups to compare each factor scores. Third, established the level of delinquency risk by calculating average readmit rate of the juvenile classification office. Forth, verified validity of this assessment system. The convergent validity was good because corelation among 8 diagnosis area scores was statistically significant. The discrimination validity was also good because assessment scores of validity group(expected lower delinquency risk level) were statistically significantly lower than those of norm group(expected higher delinquency risk level). But prediction validity was not good because corelation between 8diagnosis area scores and remediation score was not statistically markedly significant. According to this study, must be reflect this study result on TEAMS to make use of the assessment system in real business,prepare institutional base to describe assessment scores to investigation report, develop relative education contents for hands-on workers to make the best use of this assessment system, and perform follow up study to strengthen reliability and validity of assessment system.
참고문헌 (34)
- 경찰청, , 경찰통계연보 (2009)
- 경찰청, "경찰백서" (2010)
- 김성언, "소년보호처분의 실효적 실천방안", 형사정책연구, 19(2), pp.25~62 (2008), 한국형사정책연구원
- 김성언, "청소년 범죄추세(1998-2008) 분석과 대응방안의 탐색", 제17회 소년보호학술대회 세미나 자료집 (2009)
- 21세기 소년사법 개혁의 방향과 과제(I): 제1부 청소년 비행 및 소년사법정책현황분석, "김은경", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2007)
- 김종수, "청소년 비행관련 변인과 범죄위험성과의 관계분석", 한국범죄심리연구, 2(2), pp.175~202 (2006), 한국범죄심리학회
- 김지선, "청소년범죄의 발생과 처리실태", 형사정책연구소식, 98, pp.2~7 (2006)
- 김헌수, "재범 비행 청소년의 예측인자 분석", 신경정신의학, 40(2), pp.279~291 (2001), 대한신경정신의학회
- 대검찰청, "범죄분석" (2010)
- 박상열, "교정환경의 변화와 교정교육 프로그램의 다양화", 矯正硏究, 45, pp.7~38 (2009), 한국교정학회
- 법무부, "소년보호60년사" (2004)
- 법무부, "소년보호교육기관 심리검사 요강", ~ (2006)
- 법무부, "판결전조사", ~ (2010)
- 법무연수원, "범죄백서" (2008)
- 법원행정처, , 사법연감 (2010)
- 보건복지가족부, "아동청소년백서" (2008)
- 서동혁, "구속된 비행 청소년들의 석방 후 6개월 이내 재범의 예측요인", 신경정신의학, 40(3), pp.463~476 (2001), 대한신경정신의학회
- 양계민, "청소년기 제한형 및 평생 지속형 범죄 청소년의 판별변인 분석", 한국심리학회지:일반, 22(1), pp.63~88 (2003), 한국심리학회
- 오영근, "개정 소년법의 과제와 전망", 2008년 춘계 형사정책세미나 자료집 (2008)
- 이민식, "LSI-R을 이용한 성별·범죄유형별 재범유발요인", 형사정책연구, 20(1), pp.157~187 (2009), 한국형사정책연구원
- 이수정, "경찰단계에서의 소년범 위험성 평가를 위한 비행촉발요인 조사도구 개발", 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격, 19(1), pp.71~100 (2005), 한국사회및성격심리학회
- 이수정, "경찰단계에서의 범죄소년 다이버젼을 위한 비행성 평가절차의 재범예측력 연구", 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격, 21(2), pp.47~57 (2007), 한국사회및성격심리학회
- 이수정, "TEAMS 비행위험성 진단체계 평가규준 개발에 관한 연구 외부전문가 자문", ~ (2010)
- 이해경, "청소년 자기보고형 문제행동평가척도의 개발：신뢰도와 타당도의 검증", 한국심리학회지: 발달, 17(1), pp.147~170 (2004), 한국심리학회 산하 한국발달심리학회
- 청소년의 재범예방프로그램 개발에 관한 연구, "최인섭", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2009)
- 한국고용정보원, "청소년 직업흥미검사 실시요람" (2008)
- 한영선, "저연령 비행청소년 처우모형 개발 연구:촉법소년 개별처우를 중심으로", 범죄예방정책연구, 21, pp.117~160 (2009)
- 소년범의 검사 결정전조사제도를 위한 위험성평가도구 개발연구, "홍영오", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2009)
- 황의갑, "TEAMS 비행위험성 진단체계 평가규준 개발에 관한 연구 외부전문가 자문", ~ (2010)
- 소년보호 통계의 효용성 제고를 위한 소년보호통계개선방안 연구. 법무부 범죄예방정책국 정책용역연구, "이민식", ~ (2010)
- Andrews, D. A, "The Psychology of Criminal Conduct" (2003), Anderson Publishing Co
- Andrews, D. A., "The Recent Past and Near Future of Risk and", or Need Assessment, 2003, pp.52, 7~27
- Gendreau,P, "Offender rehabilitation: What we know and what needs to be done", Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, pp.144~161 (1996)
- Wasserman, G. A., "Risk and protective factors of child delinquency. Bulletin, In DC: U. S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs" (2003), Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention