2015 개정 과학과 교육과정의 생명과학Ⅰ에 제시된 탐구 활동의 적합성
Appropriateness of Inquiry Activities Presented in Life Science I of the 2015 Revised Science Curriculum
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Curriculum is the basis of school education that presents the direction of education. In accordance with the trend of the times, the 2015 revised science curriculum emphasizes inquiry, which is the most important element of science education. As a result, it presents inquiry activities. However, there is no analysis on whether the inquiry activities presented in the curriculum are appropriate for the unit. Therefore, in this study was analyzed whether the inquiry activities presented in the 2015 revised Science Curriculum Life ScienceⅠ were appropriate. To this end, the semantic network analysis was used to analyze the connection network of concepts presented in the inquiry activities of the curriculum and the main texts of the textbook. The results reveal that the most units included in Life Science I of the 2015 Revised Science Curriculum are not well structured for learning life science concepts through the inquiry activities, as the concepts presented in the inquiry activities and the main text are not well connected and there were differences in the number of inquiry activities for each sub-unit. Based on the results, it was concluded that the inquiry activities presented in Life Science I of the 2015 revised science curriculum needed to be modified and supplemented. It is necessary to appropriately distribute the number of inquiry activities by sub-unit so that the inquiry activities presented in the curriculum can be appropriate. And to add social issues and real life-related contents to the text of the textbook. In addition, additional research is required on the degree of students' understanding caused by the difference in concepts connecting between inquiry activities and main texts. The results of this study are expected to be used as guidelines for future curriculum and textbook.
Abstract
Curriculum is the basis of school education that presents the direction of education. In accordance with the trend of the times, the 2015 revised science curriculum emphasizes inquiry, which is the most important element of science education. As a result, it presents inquiry activities. However, there is no analysis on whether the inquiry activities presented in the curriculum are appropriate for the unit. Therefore, in this study was analyzed whether the inquiry activities presented in the 2015 revised Science Curriculum Life ScienceⅠ were appropriate. To this end, the semantic network analysis was used to analyze the connection network of concepts presented in the inquiry activities of the curriculum and the main texts of the textbook. The results reveal that the most units included in Life Science I of the 2015 Revised Science Curriculum are not well structured for learning life science concepts through the inquiry activities, as the concepts presented in the inquiry activities and the main text are not well connected and there were differences in the number of inquiry activities for each sub-unit. Based on the results, it was concluded that the inquiry activities presented in Life Science I of the 2015 revised science curriculum needed to be modified and supplemented. It is necessary to appropriately distribute the number of inquiry activities by sub-unit so that the inquiry activities presented in the curriculum can be appropriate. And to add social issues and real life-related contents to the text of the textbook. In addition, additional research is required on the degree of students' understanding caused by the difference in concepts connecting between inquiry activities and main texts. The results of this study are expected to be used as guidelines for future curriculum and textbook.
참고문헌 (43)
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., "The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural", Science Education, 82, pp.417~436 (1998)[DOI]
- Abd-El-Khalicket, F., "Inquiry in science education:International perspectives", Science Education, 88, pp.397~419 (2004)[DOI]
- Anderson, R. D., "Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry", Journal of Science Teacher Education Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, pp.1~12 (2002)[DOI]
- Angus, C. H., "Is Textbook Obsolete in New Education? A Critical Analysis on the Value of Textbook in An Inquiry Curriculum, with Special Reference to the New Primary General Studies Curriculum in Hong Kong", ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 490764, ~ (2004)
- Bybee, R. W., "Teaching Secondary School Science: Strategies for Developing Scientific Literacy" (2008), Pearson Prentice Hall
- 정수연, "2015 개정 과학과 교육과정에 따른 고등학교 생명과학Ⅱ 교과서의 탐구활동 유형 분석", 과학교육연구지, 43(1), pp.43~63 (2019), 과학교육연구소[DOI]
- Chiang-Soong, B., "The inclusion of STS material in the most frequently used secondary science textbooks in the U.S.", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, pp.339~349 (1993)[DOI]
- Han, K., "The meaning and research agenda in network analysis as social science methodology:Based on semantic network analysis", The Korean Association for the Social Studies Education, 10, pp.219~235 (2003)
- Harlan, J., "Science Experience for the Early Child-hood Years: An Integrated Affective Approach" (2011), Pearson
- Hofstein, A., "The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century", Science Education, 88, pp.28~54 (2004)[DOI]
- Jeon, S., "High School Life Science I" (2017), Jihak Publishing Co
- 정오남, "미세 플라스틱 문제해결 융합 프로그램이 고등학생의 창의적 문제해결력, 융합인재교육 정의적 영역 및 환경문제 인식에 미치는 영향", 통합교육과정연구, 14(2), pp.31~54 (2020), 한국통합교육과정학회[DOI]
- Kang, N., "Secondary students’ competence in science inquiry evaluation", Journal of KNUE Science Education, 18, pp.107~117 (2012)
- 윤호열, "2-모드 네트워크 분석을 활용한 지역혁신클러스터 탐색에 관한 연구: 지역혁신기관 연구개발네트워크를 중심으로", 기술혁신학회지, 24(1), pp.17~40 (2021), 한국기술혁신학회[DOI]
- 김구연, "How Teachers Use Mathematics Curriculum Materials in Planning and Implementing Mathematics Lessons", 학교수학, 13(3), pp.485~500 (2011), 대한수학교육학회
- 이봉우, "외국 과학교육과정의 관찰과 측정 기준 분석", 초등과학교육, 26(1), pp.87~96 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 김미정, "중학교 과학교과서 생명과학 단원의 탐구 활동 분석: 과학탐구 기능과 8가지 과학 실천을 중심으로", 과학교육연구지, 41(3), pp.318~333 (2017), 과학교육연구소[DOI]
- 김영신, "초·중·고 식물 관련 단원의 탐구 활동과 교과서 본문 설명 개념 사이의 네트워크 변화 분석", 생물교육, 48(3), pp.389~397 (2020), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- 김영신, "언어 네트워크 분석을 이용한 초등학교 과학 교과서 개념과 성취 기준 추출 개념의 연계성 비교 연구 - 생명과학 영역을 중심으로 -", 초등과학교육, 35(3), pp.377~387 (2016), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
- Kim, Y., "Connection of terms between inquiry activities and the main text in the life science unit of lower secondary school textbooks in the Republic of Korea", Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21, pp.1004~1025 (2022)[DOI]
- 서경희, "언어 네트워크 분석을 활용한 교육과정 개정에 따른 자극과 반응 단원의 개념 연계성 변화", 생물교육, 48(1), pp.20~37 (2020), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- Krippendorff, K., "Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology" (1980), Sage
- 권형석, "Analysis of Semantic Network in Life Science Domains on Middle School Textbook Based on 2009 Revised National Science Curriculum by Publisher", Brain, Digital, & Learning, 8(1), pp.17~32 (2018), 뇌·AI기반교육연구소[DOI]
- 권형석, "2009 개정 중학교 과학 교과서 광합성 단원의 개념 네트워크 분석", 생물교육, 46(1), pp.63~70 (2018), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- 권문호, "2015 개정 과학과 교육과정의 ‘기능’에 대한 비판적 검토", 한국과학교육학회지, 40(2), pp.151~161 (2020), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- 이두연, "고등학생들의 지구시스템 관점에 기반한 탄소 순환 개념 분석", 과학교육연구지, 37(1), pp.157~169 (2013), 과학교육연구소[DOI]
- 이준기, "언어 네트워크 분석법을 통한 중학교 과학영재들의 사실, 가설, 이론, 법칙과 과학적인 것의 의미에 대한 인식 조사", 한국과학교육학회지, 32(5), pp.823~840 (2012), 한국과학교육학회
- 이선우, "고등학교 논의기반 탐구 과학수업에서 학생 평가활동이 주장과 증거 형성에 미치는 영향", 대한화학회지, 62(3), pp.203~213 (2018), 대한화학회[DOI]
- 임수민, "언어 네트워크 분석을 통한 2009 개정 생명과학 교육과정의 연계성 분석", 생물교육, 43(1), pp.84~96 (2015), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- "Ministry of Education", 2015
- 나용식, "‘탄소 순환’ 개념 학습을 위한 MBL 탐구 활동 개발", 현장과학교육, 16(1), pp.95~108 (2022), 한국현장과학교육학회[DOI]
- 오채원, "2015 개정 중학교 교육과정의 생명과학 영역에 제시된 탐구 활동은 적절한가?", 생물교육, 50(1), pp.51~57 (2022), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- Oh, H., "High School Life Science I" (2017), Mirae N Co
- Park, H., "Analysis of the Biological Themes and Their Articulations in Science and Biology Textbooks Developed under the 2009 Revised Science Curriculum Using Concept Networks", Doctoral, pp.2016
- 박한우, "한국어의 내용분석을 위한 KrKwic 프로그램의 이해와 적용 : Daum.net에서 제공된 지역혁신에 관한 뉴스를 대상으로", Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society, 6(5), pp.1377~1387 (2004), 한국자료분석학회
- 박재근, "2015 개정 초등 과학과 교육과정의 성취 기준과 탐구 활동 변화 분석", 초등과학교육, 36(1), pp.43~60 (2017), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
- 박신아, "교육과정 개정에 따른 초등학교 과학 교과서의식물의 구조와 기능 단원의 개념 네트워크 구조와 연계성", 생물교육, 49(1), pp.81~93 (2021), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- Sadler, T. D., "Evolution of a model for socio-scientific issue teaching and learning", International Journal of Science Education, 26, pp.387~409 (2017)[DOI]
- Shim, K., "High school Life Science I" (2017), Visang Education
- 송신철, "2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 고등학교 과학 교과 탐구활동의 과학과 핵심역량 분석", 생물교육, 47(2), pp.197~212 (2019), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- Staver, J. R., "Analysis of the conceptual structure and reasoning demands of elementary science texts at the primary (K-3) level", Journal of Research in Science Education, 26, pp.329~349 (1989)
- Weinburgh, M., "Confronting and changing middle school teachers' perceptions of scientific methodology", School Science and Mathematics, 103, pp.222~232 (2003)[DOI]
- Zangori, L., "Student development of modelbased reasoning about carbon cycling and climate change in a socio-scientific issues unit", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54, pp.1249~1273 (2017)[DOI]
