Adequacy of Inquiry Activities in Life Science Ⅱ Based on the 2015 Revised Science Curriculum
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In education, a curriculum is the blueprint that suggests educational directions and serves as a basis for formal schooling. The revision of the curriculum is made upon the demands of both the nation and the society. The science curriculum emphasizes inquiry, the most essential element of science education. The 2015 revised science curriculum presents inquiry activities as one of the methods that place high importance on inquiry. However, no analysis has been conducted to examine whether the inquiry activities in the curriculum are adequately implemented in each unit. In this regard, this study sought to analyze the adequacy of inquiry activities in Life Science Ⅱ based on the 2015 Revised Science Curriculum. To this end, a connection network between the inquiry activity in the textbook and the concept presented in the main text was analyzed by using semantic network analysis. The results showed that there are units in which inquiry activities in the curriculum are not adequate, and no inquiry activities are undertaken in areas that pose difficulties in the processes of observation and experimentation. Therefore, based on the findings of this study, it is expected that the inquiry activities of the curriculum will be presented in the following areas, such as life science inquiry methods, cellular respiration, and regulation of gene expression, to which inquiry activities were not given.
Abstract
In education, a curriculum is the blueprint that suggests educational directions and serves as a basis for formal schooling. The revision of the curriculum is made upon the demands of both the nation and the society. The science curriculum emphasizes inquiry, the most essential element of science education. The 2015 revised science curriculum presents inquiry activities as one of the methods that place high importance on inquiry. However, no analysis has been conducted to examine whether the inquiry activities in the curriculum are adequately implemented in each unit. In this regard, this study sought to analyze the adequacy of inquiry activities in Life Science Ⅱ based on the 2015 Revised Science Curriculum. To this end, a connection network between the inquiry activity in the textbook and the concept presented in the main text was analyzed by using semantic network analysis. The results showed that there are units in which inquiry activities in the curriculum are not adequate, and no inquiry activities are undertaken in areas that pose difficulties in the processes of observation and experimentation. Therefore, based on the findings of this study, it is expected that the inquiry activities of the curriculum will be presented in the following areas, such as life science inquiry methods, cellular respiration, and regulation of gene expression, to which inquiry activities were not given.
참고문헌 (33)
- American Association for the Advancement of Science, "Science-A Process Approach, Part A, Description of The program" (1967), Xerox
- Angus, C. H., "Is textbook obsolete in new education? A critical analysis on the value of textbook in an inquiry curriculum, with special reference to the new primary general studies curriculum in Hong Kong", ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 490764, ~ (2004)
- Bybee, R. W., "Teaching Secondary School Science: Strategies for Developing Scientific Literacy" (2008), Pearson Prentice Hall
- Gott, R., "The assessment of observation in science", School Science Review, 69, pp.217~227 (1987)
- Jeon, S., "High School Life Science Ⅱ" (2017), Jihak Publishing Co
- 정수연, "2015 개정 과학과 교육과정에 따른 고등학교 생명과학Ⅱ 교과서의 탐구활동 유형 분석", 과학교육연구지, 43(1), pp.43~63 (2019), 과학교육연구소[DOI]
- 정수연, "2009 개정과 2015 개정 과학과 교육과정에 따른 고등학교 생명과학 Ⅱ 교과서의 탐구활동 유형 분석", 현장과학교육, 14(2), pp.160~174 (2020), 한국현장과학교육학회[DOI]
- 정성엽, "초등학생과 중학생들이 관찰, 의문 생성, 실험 설계 단계에서 사용하는 개념의 일관성", 생물교육, 47(3), pp.278~289 (2019), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- 김지은, "중학교 과학교과서 여러 가지 힘 단원의 탐구 활동 분석", Brain, Digital, & Learning, 11(1), pp.27~48 (2021), 뇌기반교육연구소[DOI]
- 김미정, "중학교 과학교과서 생명과학 단원의 탐구 활동 분석: 과학탐구 기능과 8가지 과학 실천을 중심으로", 과학교육연구지, 41(3), pp.318~333 (2017), 과학교육연구소[DOI]
- 김영신, "초·중·고 식물 관련 단원의 탐구 활동과 교과서 본문 설명 개념 사이의 네트워크 변화 분석", 생물교육, 48(3), pp.389~397 (2020), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- Kim, Y., "Alignment of concepts of meiosis among curriculum, textbooks, classroom teaching and assessment in upper secondary school in Republic of Korea", Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21, pp.232~244 (2022)[DOI]
- Kim, Y., "Connection of terms between inquiry activities and the main text in the life science unit of lower secondary school textbooks in the Republic of Korea", Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21, pp.1004~1025 (2022)[DOI]
- 김영신, "2009 개정 중학교 과학 생명과학 영역 개념의 대단원별 연계성", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 18(18), pp.29~49 (2018), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
- 김영신, "고등학교 생명과학 I 세포분열 단원에 대한 교육과정, 교과서, 수업 및 평가의 개념 네트워크 분석", 생물교육, 47(3), pp.393~402 (2019), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- Klahr, D., "Heuristics for scientific experimentation : A developmental study", Cognitive Psychology, 25, pp.111~146 (1993)[DOI]
- 권형석, "2009 개정 중학교 과학 교과서 광합성 단원의 개념 네트워크 분석", 생물교육, 46(1), pp.63~70 (2018), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- 임수민, "언어 네트워크 분석을 통한 2009 개정 생명과학 교육과정의 연계성 분석", 생물교육, 43(1), pp.84~96 (2015), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- The Science Framework P-10: Science for Every Student Melbourne, "Malcolm, C.", Ministry of Education, ~ (1987)
- Millar, R., "Practical Work in School Science: Which Way Now?", pp.16~31 (1998), Routledge
- Science Curriculum. The Notification of MOE 2015-74: The Separate Volume No. 9, "Ministry of Education", Ministry of Education, ~ (2015)
- 남기범, "고등학교 생명과학 II ‘유전자와 생명 공학’ 영역에 대한 고찰", 현장과학교육, 11(3), pp.368~381 (2017), 한국현장과학교육학회
- National Research Council, "Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards" (2000), National Academy Press
- 오채원, "2015 개정 중학교 교육과정의 생명과학 영역에 제시된 탐구 활동은 적절한가?", 생물교육, 50(1), pp.51~57 (2022), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- Oh, H., "High School Life Science Ⅱ" (2017), Mirae N Co
- Osborne, J., "Teaching scientific practices : Meeting the challenge of change", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, pp.177~196 (2014)[DOI]
- 박형용, "중학교 과학 교과서와 교사의 강의 및 중학생의 개념 관계망 비교 - 식물의 영양을 중심으로 -", 생물교육, 46(3), pp.368~379 (2018), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- 박재근, "2015 개정 초등 과학과 교육과정의 성취 기준과 탐구 활동 변화 분석", 초등과학교육, 36(1), pp.43~60 (2017), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
- 박신아, "교육과정 개정에 따른 초등학교 과학 교과서의식물의 구조와 기능 단원의 개념 네트워크 구조와 연계성", 생물교육, 49(1), pp.81~93 (2021), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- 심규철, "2009 개정 및 2015 개정 과학과 교육과정에 따른 생명과학 I, II 교과서의 과학 글쓰기 활동 비교 분석", 현장과학교육, 16(2), pp.179~194 (2022), 한국현장과학교육학회[DOI]
- Shim, K., "High school Life Science Ⅱ" (2017), Visang Education
- Weinburgh, M., "Confronting and changing middle school teachers' perceptions of scientific methodology", School Science and Mathematics, 103, pp.222~232 (2003)[DOI]
- Wellington, J., "Practical Work in School Science: Which Way Now?", pp.3~15 (1998), Routledge